6-5 tetracyclic protosteryl cation formation, hydride and
methyl group migration to the lanosteryl C-8/C-9 cation, and
highly specific deprotonation. The formation of pentacyclic
ꢀ-amyrin, catalyzed by ꢀ-amyrin synthase, proceeds similarly
with the exception of chair-chair (C-C) bicyclic conforma-
tion, and the cationic cyclization of the tetracyclic dammare-
nyl cation, which is followed by annulation of a fifth ring.
Among various triterpene biosyntheses, the concerted or
nonconcerted A/B ring cyclization mechanism and the C-B
versus C-C B-ring conformation have been of specific interest
to most researchers.3,6 In the oxidosqualene-lanosterol cy-
clase-catalyzed cyclization, although it was proposed that
expoxide opening was concerted with A-ring formation or
even B-ring formation, truncated monocyclic cyclization
products have been isolated from various S. cereVisiae ERG7
mutants.4a,5a-d,6a Furthermore, although B-ring boats are
well-represented in triterpenoids with three or more rings,
biosynthesis of bicyclic triterpene alcohol has only been
achieved with C-C trans-decalin derivatives.7 No known
bicyclic triterpene alcohols derived from a C-B bicyclic
cation have been reported. The energetically unfavorable boat
conformation in oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase and oxi-
dosqualene-cycloartenol synthase is probably achieved by
enzyme residues through a steric and/or an electronic effect.8
Recently, we have reported on the isolation of enzymatic
products derived from the carbocationic intermediates of
monocyclic, tricyclic, tetracyclic, truncated-rearranged, and
altered deprotonated products produced by single amino acid
replacement of Tyr99, Trp232, His2434, Phe445, Tyr510,
or Phe699 in S. cereVisiae ERG7.5 Previously, it was
predicted that the human oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase’s
(human OSC) Tyr98 residue (corresponding to Tyr99 in S.
cereVisiae oxidosqualene-lanosterol cyclase, ERG7) was
spatially positioned to enforce the energetically unfavorable
B-ring boat conformation of OS by pushing the methyl group
at C-8 below the molecular plane.8 However, our site-
saturated mutagenesis experiments established that the prob-
able function of ERG7 Tyr99 is to achieve both the C-B
tricyclic Markovnikov C-14 (lanosterol numbering) cation
stabilization and the regio- or stereochemical control of the
protons at the C-15 position for subsequent deprotonation,
but not B-ring formation.
We previously generated ERG7 wild-type and mutant
homology models, based on human OSC X-ray crystal
structure, to investigate the effects of amino acid substitutions
on the cyclization mechanism and product profiles.5 To
explore the plasticity residues involved in OS B-ring
cyclization, we applied a contact mapping strategy that aims
to probe amino acids within van der Waals radii distance of
the C-8 carbon of OS or LA, based on the assumption that
amino acids within the active site are most likely to contribute
to a catalytic outcome. Mutational studies of plasticity
residues may provide insight into the role of these residues
in the determination of the B-ring configuration or in
generating an evolved enzyme with new reactivities. Among
the various putative ERG7 C-8 contact mapping residues
under investigation, the Tyr707 residue is of particular
interest and was therefore subjected to genetic selection and
product characterization. In this study, we describe the
identification of the ERG7 Tyr707 residue as a crucial
component for B-ring stabilization and/or final deprotonation,
as well as the characterization of the mutational effects on
product specificity/diversity.
We first generated ERG7∆Y707 deletion and ERG7Y707X site-
saturated mutations and expressed them in a yeast HEM1
ERG7 double-knockout mutant TKW14, as previously de-
scribed.5 The genetic selection results of Tyr707X mutants
showed that most mutations at Tyr707 cannot abolish the
activity of ERG7 cyclase with the exception of the Tyr707Arg
mutation (Table 1), indicating that the Tyr707 mutations are
not detrimental to the catalytic activity of ERG7. However,
the loss of activity of ERG7∆707 deletion mutant suggested
that the existence of Tyr707 is essential for the catalytic
function of ERG7. Next, the TKW14[pERG7Y707X] mutant
strains were cultured and nonsaponifiable lipid (NSL) extracts
were isolated for product characterization. Silica gel column
chromatography coupled with thin layer chromatography
(TLC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-
MS) were used to analyze the triterpenoid products with a
molecular mass of 426 Da. The ERG7Y707X mutants showed
one to four distinct products. Three products were identified
as authentic LA (2), 9ꢀ-lanosta-7,24-dien-3ꢀ-ol (3), and
parkeol (4) by comparison with authentic standards using
1H and 13C NMR as well as GC-MS. A fourth distinct
compound, with a 1.5 min reduced retention time compared
to LA on the GC column, was isolated and further character-
(3) (a) Abe, I.; Rohmer, M.; Prestwich, G. D. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
2189–2206. (b) Wendt, K. U.; Schulz, G. E.; Corey, E. J.; Liu, D. R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2812–2833. (d) Wendt, K. U. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 3966–3971.
(4) (a) Corey, E. J.; Cheng, H.; Baker, C. H.; Matsuda, S. P. T.; Li, D.;
Song, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1289–1296. (b) Hart, E. A.; Hua,
L.; Darr, L. B.; Wilson, W. K.; Pang, J.; Matsuda, S. P. T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 9887–9888. (c) Joubert, B. M.; Hua, L.; Matsuda, S. P. T.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 339–341. (d) Matsuda, S. P. T.; Darr, L. B.; Hart, E. A.;
Herrera, J. B. R.; McCann, K. E.; Meyer, M. M.; Pang, J.; Schepmann,
H. G.; Wilson, W. K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2261–2263. (e) Herrera, J. B. R.;
Wilson, W. K.; Matsuda, S. P. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6765–
6766. (f) Meyer, M. M.; Xu, R.; Matsuda, S. P. T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1395–
1398. (g) Xu, R.; Fazio, G. C.; Matsuda, S. P. T. Phytochemistry 2004, 65,
261–291. (h) Lodeiro, S.; Schulz-Gasch, T.; Matsuda, S. P. T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 14132–14133. (i) Lodeiro, S.; Wilson, W. K.; Shan, H.;
Matsuda, S. P. T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 439–442. (j) Lodeiro, S.; Xiong, Q.;
Wilson, W. K.; Kolesnikova, M. D.; Onak, C. S.; Matsuda, S. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11213–11222.
(5) (a) Wu, T. K.; Chang, C. H. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 1712–1715.
(b) Wu, T. K.; Liu, Y. T.; Chang, C. H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1177–
1181. (c) Wu, T. K.; Yu, M. T.; Liu, Y. T.; Chang, C. H.; Wang, H. J.;
Diau, E. W. G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1319–1322. (d) Wu, T. K.; Liu, Y. T.;
Chang, C. H.; Yu, M. T.; Wang, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6414–
6419. (e) Wu, T. K.; Liu, Y. T.; Chiu, F. H.; Chang, C. H. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 4691–4694. (f) Wu, T. K.; Wen, H. Y.; Chang, C. H.; Liu, Y. T. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 2529–2532. (g) Wu, T. K.; Chang, C. H.; Liu, Y. T.; Wang,
T. T. Chem. Rec. 2008, in press.
(6) (a) Gao, D.; Pan, Y. K.; Byun, K.; Gao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 4045–4046. (b) Hess, B. A., Jr.; Smentek, L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1717–
1720
.
(7) (a) Boar, R. B.; Couchman, L. A.; Jaques, A. J.; Perkins, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2476–2477. (b) Bennett, G. J.; Harrison, L. J.; Sia,
G. L.; Sim, K. Y. Phytochemistry 1993, 32, 1245–1251. (c) Nguyen,
L. H. D.; Harrison, L. J. Phytochemistry 1998, 50, 471–476. (d) Fu¨ll, C.;
Poralla, K. FEMS Microbial. Lett. 2000, 183, 221–224. (e) Fu¨ll, C. FEBS
Lett. 2001, 509, 361–364. (f) Sato, T.; Hoshino, T. Biosci. Biotechnol.
Biochem. 2001, 65, 2233–2242. (g) Hoshino, T.; Sato, T. Chem. Commun.
2002, 291–301.
(8) Thoma, R.; Schulz-Gasch, T.; D’Arcy, B.; Benz, J.; Aebi, J.;
Dehmlow, H.; Hennig, M.; Stihle, M.; Ruf, A. Nature 2004, 432, 118–
122.
4960
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008