9836
K.C. Braaten et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 9828–9836
pipet into an autosampler vial. The solution (0.5
mL) was analyzed
Supplementary data
with the following GC conditions: VF-5ms column; 30 mꢃ
0.25 mmꢃ0.25
m
m; inlet temperature 260 ꢂC; temperature gradi-
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
ent: temperature 1, 60 ꢂC (2 min); temperature 2, 270 ꢂC (1 min);
rate 30 ꢂC/min, total runtime 10 min; helium constant flow of
1.0 mL/min. The retention time for benzaldehyde was 4.4 min. The
MS response was calibrated with benzaldehyde solutions of known
concentration (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 mM) and the response
was found to be linear. Control experiments found that the addition
of triethylamine and sample filtration did not alter the detection
of benzaldehyde. Analysis reproducibility was found to be
satisfactory.
References and notes
1. (a) Sessler, J. L.; Weghorn, S. Expanded, Contracted, and Isomeric Porphyrins;
Elsevier: Oxford, 1997; (b) Jasat, A.; Dolphin, D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2267–2340;
(c) Sessler, J. L.; Gebauer, A.; Vogel, E. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M.,
Smith, K., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 2000; Vol. 2, pp 1–54; (d)
Sessler, J. L.; Gebauer, A.; Weghorn, S. J. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K.
M., Smith, K., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 2000; Vol. 2, pp 55–
124; (e) Sessler, J. L.; Seidel, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5134–5175; (f)
Misra, R.; Chandrashekar, T. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 265–279.
2. (a) Vogel, E.; Will, S.; Schulze-Tilling, A.; Neumann, L.; Lex, J.; Bill, E.; Trautwein,
A. X.; Wieghardt, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 731–735; (b) Erben, C.;
Will, S.; Kadish, K. M. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K.,
Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 2000; Vol. 2, pp 233–300; (c) Gross,
Z. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6, 733–738.
3. (a) Sessler, J. L.; Cyr, M. J.; Burrell, A. K. Synlett 1991, 127–134; (b) Sessler, J. L.;
Davis, J. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 989–997.
4. Geier, G. R., III; Grindrod, S. C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6404–6412.
5. Vogel, E.; Bro¨ring, M.; Fink, J.; Rosen, D.; Schmickler, H.; Lex, J.; Chan, K. W. K.;
Wu, Y.-D.; Plattner, D. A.; Nendel, M.; Houk, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1995, 34, 2511–2514.
6. (a) Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Bley-Escrich, J.; Gross, M.; Zander, L.; Michels, M.; Vogel,
E. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 469, 170–175; (b) Werner, A.; Michels, M.; Zander,
L.; Lex, J.; Vogel, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3650–3653; (c) Bley-Escrich,
J.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Vogel, E.; Gross, M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 2829–2837;
(d) Bley-Escrich, J.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Michels, M.; Zander, L.; Vogel, E.; Gross,
M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 492–499.
7. (a) Orti, E.; Tomas, F.; Sanchez-Marin, J. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.) 1983, 104,
197–206; (b) Orti, E.; Sanchez-Marin, J.; Tomas, F. Theor. Chim. Acta 1986, 69,
41–49; (c) Orti, E.; Sanchez-Marin, J.; Tomas, F. J. Chim. Phys. 1987, 84, 729–734;
(d) Kofranek, M.; Kovar, T.; Karpfen, A.; Lischka, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 4464–
4473; (e) Padilla-Campos, L.; Toro-Labbe, A. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.) 1995, 330,
223–229; (f) Duarte, H. A.; Duani, H.; De Almeida, W. B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003,
369, 114–124.
4.5. Reaction time course experiments
Immediately prior to the reactions, 2 (37.6 mg, 0.0875 mmol) or
4 (29.8 mg, 0.0875) was reduced to the corresponding dicarbinol
species 2-OH or 4-OH as described above in the survey of catalysis
conditions. After drying under vacuum for 30 min, the dicarbinol
species (2-OH or 4-OH) was dissolved in the desired solvent and 3
(11.6 mg, 0.0875 mmol) or 1 (19.4 mg, 0.0875 mmol) was added to
afford a stock solution of 2-OH and 3 or 4-OH and 1 (2.5 mM each).
Reactions were performed at room temperature in tightly capped
20-mL vials stirred with a micro stir bar. Solid acids were weighed
into all reaction vials prior to beginning the reaction sequence for
the day, and each reaction was started by the addition of 8 mL of the
reactant solution via volumetric pipet. Reactions involving TFA
were initiated by the addition of TFA to reaction vials already
containing 8 mL of the reactant stock solution. The reactions were
monitored for yield of HPO, TPC, TPP spectrophotometrically as
described previously,4 for yield of benzaldehyde, and for oligomer
composition by LD-MS at 1 min, 4 min, 8 min, 15 min, 30 min,
45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h.
8. Laha, J. K.; Dhanalekshmi, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Ambroise, A.; Lindsey, J. S. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 799–812.
TLC analysis: an aliquot (100
transferred to microfuge tube containing DDQ (0.34 mg,
0.0015 mmol). The sample was vortex mixed and allowed to stand
for at least 5 min. An aliquot (2 L) of the crude, oxidized reaction
m
L) of crude reaction mixture was
9. Geier, G. R., III; Chick, J. F. B.; Callinan, J. B.; Reid, C. G.; Auguscinski, W. P. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 4159–4169.
a
10. (a) Bro¨ring, M. Synthesis 2000, 1291–1294; (b) Bro¨ring, M.; Griebel, D.; Hell, C.;
Pfister, A. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2001, 5, 708–714; (c) Setsune, J.; Tanabe,
A.; Watanabe, J.; Maeda, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2247–2252.
11. Vogel, E.; Ko¨cher, M.; Lex, J.; Ermer, O. Isr. J. Chem. 1989, 29, 257–266.
12. (a) Rao, P. D.; Dhanalekshmi, S.; Littler, B. J.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
7323–7344; (b) Gryko, D. T.; Tasior, M.; Koszarna, B. J. Porphyrins Phthalocya-
nines 2003, 7, 239–248; (c) Tamaru, S.; Yu, L.; Youngblood, W. J.; Muthuku-
maran, K.; Taniguchi, M.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 765–777.
13. (a) White, J.; McGillivray, G. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 4248–4251; (b) Kakushima,
M.; Hamel, P.; Frenette, R.; Rokach, J. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3214–3219; (c)
Barbero, M.; Cadamuro, S.; Degani, I.; Fochi, R.; Gatti, A.; Regondi, V. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 2245–2250; (d) Bray, B. L.; Mathies, P. H.; Naef, R.; Solas, D. R.;
Tidwell, T. T.; Artis, D. R.; Muchowski, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6317–6328; (e)
Cadamuro, S.; Degani, I.; Dughera, S.; Fochi, R.; Gatti, A.; Piscopo, L. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 273–283; (f) Wallace, D. M.; Leung, S. H.; Senge, M. O.;
Smith, K. M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7245–7257.
14. The quantity of acid is reported in concentration units of molarity for conve-
nience of comparison of reaction conditions. However, InCl3, Sc(OTf)3, Yb(OTf)3,
and Dy(OTf)3 are poorly soluble in some of the solvents, and the reaction
mixtures were heterogeneous as reported previously.15
15. Geier, G. R., III; Callinan, J. B.; Rao, D. P.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Porphyrins Phthalocya-
nines 2001, 5, 810–823.
16. O’Brien, A. Y.; McGann, J. P.; Geier, G. R., III. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4084–4092.
17. Setsune, J.; Tsukajima, A.; Watanabe, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1531–1535.
18. Setsune, J.; Maeda, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12405–12406.
19. Li, F.; Yang, K.; Tyhonas, J. S.; MacCrum, K. A.; Lindsey, J. S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
12339–12360.
20. (a) Cho, W. S.; Kim, H. J.; Littler, B. J.; Miller, M. A.; Lee, C. H.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 7890–7901; (b) Strachan, J. P.; O’Shea, D. F.; Balasubramanian,
T.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3160–3172; (c) Balasubramanian, T.;
Strachan, J. P.; Boyle, P. D.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7919–7929.
21. (a) Geier, G. R., III; Lindsey, J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 677–686; (b)
Geier, G. R., III; Lindsey, J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 687–700; (c)
Geier, G. R., III; Littler, B. J.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 701–
711; (d) Geier, G. R., III; Littler, B. J.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
2001, 712–718.
m
mixture was analyzed by TLC as described above for the acidolysis
of dicarbinol species affording benzaldehyde.
LD-MS analysis: following a published procedure,21a an aliquot
(1 mL) from the same crude, oxidized reaction mixtures used in TLC
analysis was spotted onto a MALDI target. The crude, oxidized
samples were analyzed in the absence of added matrix. LD-MS
spectra were recorded using a TOF instrument in reflector mode
equipped with a nitrogen laser (337 nm), 1.2 m flight tube, MCP
detector, and a 2 GHz digitizer. Mass accuracy is <100 ppm with
external standards. Spectra were averaged over 200–300 shots
taken from at least four locations on the target. Samples were an-
alyzed after all reactions for 1 day were completed. Samples spent
between 2 and 8 h on the target prior to LD-MS analysis. Control
experiments found that samples were stable on the MALDI target
while awaiting analysis. LD-MS analysis was found to be insensitive
the quantity of DDQ used in the oxidation of the crude reaction
mixtures. Very similar spectra were obtained upon oxidizing the
reaction aliquot (100
to 2.3 mg.
mL) with quantities of DDQ ranging from 0.14
Acknowledgements
Support for this work was provided by the National Science
Foundation under grant No. 0517882. We thank Tiffany Chu for her
assistance with preliminary experiments. High resolution FAB mass
spectra were obtained at the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for
Biotechnology at North Carolina State University. Partial funding for
the facility was obtained from the North Carolina Biotechnology
Center and the National Science Foundation.
22. Krivokapic, A.; Cowley, A. R.; Anderson, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1089–1096.
23. (a) Guilard, R.; Gryko, D. T.; Canard, G.; Barbe, J.-M.; Koszarna, B.; Brandes, S.;
Tasior, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4491–4494; (b) Gryko, D. T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
1735–1743; (c) Nardis, S.; Monti, D.; Paolesse, R. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2005, 2,
355–374.