The UV-Vis spectra monitoring the sodium periodate oxidation
of 1 revealed two dominant absorption bands (at 320 and 390 nm)
for experiments carried out under basic (pH = 8) conditions, and
one absorption band (390 nm) in acidic solutions (pH = 5). Based
on the results observed during enzymatic oxidation of this
substrate, we can affirm that the band at 320 nm to be
3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and the one appearing at 380 nm to be
phosphonic o-quinone 4 (Scheme 1).4 Under basic conditions the
intensity of the band at 380 nm decreased quickly and disappeared
after 5 min. The difference in time-scale between UV-Vis and
NMR spectroscopy explains why we were unable to observe signals
corresponding to o-quinone 4 by NMR. Practical lack of the
presence of the band at 380 nm shows that the reaction in acidic
conditions is faster, but this supposition was not confirmed by other
spectroscopic methods. In order to confirm the presence of this
intermediate, we have carried out the experiment in the presence of
5 equivalents of HI, a known o-quinone reducing agent. Total lack
of the reaction progress confirms the supposition that the oxidation
proceeds via o-quinone 4.
To prove that the cleavage of the C–P bond in 1-amino-
1-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)methylphosphonic acid 1 is preceded by
the oxidation of hydroxy groups in the aromatic ring, we have
carried out this reaction using the analogue of 1 containing methoxy
groups in place of hydroxylic ones (compound 2) and compound 3,
being a formal analogue of phenylglycine. The lack of oxidation of
these two compounds by periodate was confirmed by the fact that
only the phosphonic substrates were observed in the NMR
spectra.
Summing up, we postulate that the oxidation of 1-amino-
1-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)methylphosphonic acid 1 by NaIO4 pro-
ceeds by intermediate formation of phosphonic o-quinone 4, which
immediately undergoes C–P bond cleavage and via corresponding
quinone methide 5. This intermediate may isomerize to imine 6 or
react directly with water yielding compound 7. The latter
compound, upon the loss of ammonia, provides 3,4-dihydroxy-
benzaldehyde 8 (Scheme 1, D2O conditions). This mechanism is
similar to the pathway already proposed for the oxidation of
3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid and 3,4-(dihydroxyphenyl)acetic
acid.11 This is somewhat surprising since the dephosphonylation is
far more difficult than decarboxylation. Therefore, the mechanism
of C–P bond cleavage still remains an open question. We speculate
that the very probable path of the reaction relies upon dissociative
cleavage of this bond yielding the unstable metaphosphate. The
dissociative C–P bond cleavage may be expected to take place by
a preassociation mechanism: metaphosphate ion is released pre-
associated with a water molecule. The reaction probably takes place
most rapidly when a fully resonance stabilized metaphosphate may
be formed, i.e. through the dianionic phosphonic acid. This
suggestion seems to be confirmed by the fact that the benzylic
proton was not exchanged with deuterium when monitoring the
oxidation reaction by means of NMR. This observation excludes
the alternative mechanism (Scheme 1), namely transformation of
the a-amino group of 1 and the formation of intermediate a-
ketophosphonate 11 (path via compounds 9–11). The studies of this
reaction using other phosphonic and phosphinic analogues of
DOPA as substrates are in progress.
This work was supported by Komitet Badan Naukowych.
Authors would like to acknowledge Professor H. Wojtasek for
helpful discussions and Miss B. Gasowska for technical assis-
tance.
Notes and references
1 Aminophosphonic and Aminophosphinic Acids: Chemistry and Bio-
logical Activity, V. P. Kukhar and H. R. Hudson, ed., John Wiley, New
York, 2000.
2 J. E. Hong, W. S. Shin, S. U. Jang and D. Y. Oh, J. Org. Chem., 1996,
61, 2199–2201; L. D. Quin, W. Xiao-Ping, E. Breuer and M. Mahajna,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 6281–6282; B. Boduszek, Tetrahedron,
1996, 52, 12 483–12 494; B. Boduszek, R. Latajka and W. Lesniak,
Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon, 2000, 165, 53–76; B. Boduszek, R. Latajka
and U. Walkowiak, Pol. J. Chem., 2001, 75, 63–70; L. D. Quin, J.
Szewczyk, K. M. Szewczyk and A. T. McPhail, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51,
3341–3347; B. Boduszek, A. Halama and J. Zon, Tetrahedron, 1997,
53, 11 399–11 410; V. Kashman and O. Awerbouch, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1975, 31, 53–62; L. D. Quin, J. C. Kisalus and K. A. Mesch, J. Org.
Chem., 1983, 48, 4466–4472.
3 L. P. Wackett, S. L. Shames, C. P. Venditti and C. T. Walsh, J.
Bacteriol., 1987, 169, 710–717; L. D. Zeleznick, T. C. Meyers and E. B.
Titchener, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1963, 78, 546–547; M. L. Cordeiro,
D. L. Pompliano and J. W. Frost, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108,
332–334; M. Kertesz, A. Elgorriaga and N. Amrhein, Bidegradation,
1991, 2, 53–59; R. Pipke, N. Amrhein, G. S. Jacob, G. M. Kishore and
J. Schaefer, Eur. J. Biochem., 1987, 165, 267–273; G. M. Kishore and
G. F. Barry, PCT Int. Appl., 1992, WO 92/00377; P. Mastalerz, Z.
Wieczorek and M. Kochman, Acta Biochim. Pol., 1965, 12, 151–156;
M. A. Kertesz, A. M. Cook and T. Leisinger, FEMS Microbiol. Rev.,
1994, 15, 195–215; J. M. La Nauze and H. Rosenberg, Biochim.
Biophys. Acta, 1968, 165, 438–447; L. Z. Avila, S. H. Loo and J. W.
Frost, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 6758–6764; J. D. Smith and J. H.
Law, Biochemistry, 1970, 9, 2152–2157.
4 B. Gasowska, H. Wojtasek, J. Hurek, M. Drag, K. Nowak and P.
Kafarski, Eur. J. Biochem., 2002, 269, 4098–4104.
5 E. T. Kaiser and S. W. Weidman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86,
4354–4358; S. W. Weidman and E. T. Kaiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966,
88, 5820–5827.
6 F. G. Canovas, F. G. Carmona, J. V. Sanchez, J. L. I. Pastor and J. A. L.
Teruel, J. Biol. Chem., 1982, 257, 8738–8744.
7 The presence of the phosphate was confirmed in both cases by the
addition of a drop of 2% H3PO4 in D2O to the reaction mixture after
completion of the experiment and subsequent 31P NMR analysis. In the
case of 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde, the 1H NMR data of the commer-
cial sample were in high agreement with experimental d 9.42 (s, 1H,
3
formyl proton), 7.27 (d, 1H, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, aromat.), 7.21 (s, 1H,
3
aromat.), 6.78 (d, 1H, JH–H = 8.2 Hz, aromat.). The presence of the
aldehyde was confirmed additionally by UV-Vis spectroscopy of the
commercial sample (absorption band at 320 nm).
8 M. Sugumaran, V. Semensi, H. Dali and W. Mitchel, Bioorg. Chem.,
1989, 17, 86 –95.
9 M. Mochizuki, S. Yamazaki, K. Kano and T. Ikeda, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 2002, 1569, 35–44; R. C. Sealy, W. Puzyna, B. Kalyanaraman and
C. C. Felix, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1984, 800, 269–276; B.
Kalyanaraman, R. C. Sealy and K. Sivarajah, J. Biol. Chem., 1984, 259,
14 018–14 022.
10 J. Balla, T. Kiss, M. Jezowska-Bojczuk, H. Kozlowski and P. Kafarski,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1990, 1861–1866.
11 M. Sugumaran, S. Tan and H. L. Sun, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1996,
329, 175–180; M. Sugumaran, Biochemistry, 1986, 25, 4489–4492; J.
Cabanes, A. Sanchez-Ferrer, R. Bru and F. Garcia-Carmona, Biochem.
J., 1988, 256, 681–684; M. Bouheroum, J. M. Bruce and E. J. Land,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1989, 998, 57–62; M. Sugumaran, H. Dali and
V. Semensi, Biochem. J., 1992, 281, 353–357.
Scheme 1
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 1 3 2 – 1 1 3 3
1133