5114
Y. Xie et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5111–5114
3.86 (s, 3H), 3.64–3.60 (m, 2H), 2.71–2.47 (m, 2H), 2.02–1.96 (m, 1H), 0.96–0.93
Acknowledgments
(dd, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) d 170.0, 168.9, 149.4, 149.1, 133.5, 119.0,
111.4, 109.3, 93.8, 75.1, 56.3, 56.2, 55.0, 37.3, 28.1, 19.5, 19.4; ESI-MS (M++H):
306.3.15: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 6.58 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 5.15 (s, 1H),
4.71–4.65 (m, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.81–2.60 (m, 4H),
2.48–2.37 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) d 168.3, 167.4, 148.0(2C), 127.4,
127.3, 111.3, 108.6, 94.6, 56.3, 56,2, 56.0, 54.1, 38.4, 37.2, 29.4; ESI-MS (M++H):
290.1.
This work was supported by grants from the PHS, NIH, NIDDK 2
RO1 DK63567-05 (P.E.H.), and the Columbia University DERC (5
P30 DK063608-05).
9. PET study protocol: PET scans were performed on 12–14-week-old Lewis
male rats. Prior to imaging, the animals were anesthetized by isoflurane
inhalation. After a transmission scan of the area of interest had been acquired
(used to perform attenuation correction of the emission data), the radioligand
References and notes
1. Zimmet, P. Z.; Alberti, K. G. M. M.; Shaw, J. Nature 2001, 414, 782.
2. Zheng, G.; Dwoskin, L. P.; Crooks, P. A. AAPS J. 2006, 8(4), 689.
3. Anlauf, M.; Eissele, R.; Schafer, M. K. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2003, 51, 1027.
4. Souza, F.; Simpson, N.; Raffo, A.; Saxena, C.; Maffei, A.; Hardy, M.; Kibourn, M.;
Goland, R.; Leibel, R.; Mann, J. J.; Van heertum, R.; Harris, P. E. J. Clin. Invest.
2006, 116(6), 1506.
5. Murthy, R.; Harris, P. E.; Simpson, N.; Van Heertum, R.; Leibel, R.; Mann, J. J.;
Parsey, R. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35(4), 790.
6. Raffo, A.; Hancock, K.; Polito, T.; Xie, Y.; Andan, G.; Witkowski, P.; Hardy, M.;
Barba, P.; Ferrara, C.; Maffei, A.; Freeby, M.; Goland, R.; Leibel, R. L.; Sweet, L.;
Harris, P. E. JOE 2008, 198, 1.
[
11C]DTBZ was administered (0.5–1.0
lCi/gm) in saline as bolus injection via
the penile vein. PET scans of the animals were acquired dynamically to
90 min postinjection on a Concorde microPET-R4 (CTI Molecular Imaging,
Knoxville, TN, USA). The scanner provided a 100 Â 80 mm field of view with a
reconstructed resolution of 2.25 mm in the central 40 mm of the field of view.
At thirty minutes post injection of [ a second
11C]DTBZ, animals received
injection via the penile vein of cold analog. PET data were processed using
attenuation correction matrix obtained by transmission scans and images
were reconstructed using Fourier rebinning, followed by two-dimensional,
filtered back projection using microPET manager software (CTI Molecular
Imaging).
7. All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal
Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Columbia University’s College of
Physicians and Surgeons. All experiments were performed in accordance
with ‘Principles of laboratory animal care’ (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised
1985). IPGTT was performed as described in Ref. 5.
10. Scherman, D.; Henry, J. P. Mol. Pharmacol. 1984, 25, 113–122.
11. Lubbers, A.; Bohringer, M.; Gobbi, L.; Henning, M.; Hunziker, D.; Kuhn, B.;
Loffler, B.; Matei, P.; Narquizian, R.; Peters, J.; Ruff, Y.; Wessel, H. P.; Wyss, P.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2966.
8. Analytical data for active compounds. 8: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 6.90–6.85
(m, 2H), 6.84 (s, 1H), 5.45 (br, 1H), 5.07(s, 1H), 4.69–4.63 (dd, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H),
12. The DPP-IV assay was provided by BPS Bioscience, Inc. (San Diego, CA).