EnantioselectiVe Synthesis of Dihydropyrans
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 8, 2000 1637
Table 1. Arbuzov Reactions for Synthesis of Acyl Phosphonates
(Eq 10)
Substrate Synthesis. The Michaelis-Arbuzov reaction pro-
vides a convenient approach to the synthesis of acyl phospho-
nates.14 Treatment of a number of R,â-unsaturated acid chlorides
with trimethyl phosphite (neat, 0f25 °C; CAUTION: chlo-
romethane evolution) afforded unsaturated acyl phosphonates
as yellow liquids in variable yield after low pressure distillation
directly from the reaction pot (Table 1). Since both the starting
material and product are good conjugate acceptors, addition of
a second equivalent of phosphite accounted for low yields in
some cases (entries 1-3).15 The tiglic acid-derived acyl phos-
phonate (entry 5) and the â,â-disubstituted variant (entry 6) were
both formed in reasonably good yield, perhaps as a result of
steric bulk which reduces the intervention of the undesired
reaction pathway. The â,â-disubstituted substrate 6f was
obtained as a mixture of isomeric products (entry 6, E:Z 2.7:1).
In the case of â-alkoxy substrate 6d (entry 4), electronic
deactivation of the â carbon could account for the higher product
yield.
Attempts to employ the Arbuzov reaction to synthesize
cinnamic acid-derived acyl phosphonate 6b were largely unsuc-
cessful under a variety of conditions.16 Recourse was found in
an efficient two-step procedure that entailed base-promoted
addition of dimethyl phosphite to cinnamaldehyde17 and oxida-
tion of resultant allylic alcohol under Parikh-Doering conditions
(eq 11).18 Both methods described were amenable to multigram
preparation of acyl phosphonates.
The product acyl phosphonates could be stored for months
under inert atmosphere at -20 °C and could also be purified
by rapid flash chromatography; however, some hydrolysis to
the corresponding carboxylic acid was always observed. This
contaminant was easily removed with an aqueous bicarbonate
wash to give the pure acyl phosphonate; however, in practice
chromatography was typically eschewed in favor of distillation.
Catalyst Survey. Crotonyl phosphonate 6a was added to a
solution of the appropriate cationic copper(II) catalyst19 (10 mol
%, CH2Cl2) at -78 °C, followed by 3.0 equiv of freshly distilled
ethyl vinyl ether (eq 12). The unpurified cycloadduct was
isolated at the end of the reaction (TLC analysis) by filtration
through silica gel or standard aqueous workup,20 and after flash
chromatography, dihydropyran 7a was obtained in good to
excellent yield. NMR experiments established the Me-OEt cis
relationship arising from an endo transition state. The acetal
proton at C-2 exhibited a small coupling constant (J2-3eq ) 2.3
entry
product
R1
R2
R3
% yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
6a
6b
6c
H
H
H
H
Me
H
Me
Ph
i-Pr
OEt
Me
Et
H
H
H
H
H
Me
27
<10
42
79
84
6d
6e
6fa
71
a E/Z ) 2.7:1.
Hz) with the pseudoequatorial C-3 proton and a larger one with
the pseudoaxial C-3 proton (J2-3ax ) 6.8 Hz); those values are
consistent with other 2,4-substituted cis dihydropyrans.8b The
observation of NOE enhancements between the C-2 and C-4
protons confirmed the syn relationship of the two substituents.
The enantiomeric excess and absolute stereochemistry for 7a
varied with the pendant oxazoline substituent R and counterion
X. High enantioselectivity was observed for [Cu((S,S)-t-Bu-
box)](OTf)2 complex 1a, while changing to the less associating
counterion SbF6 (2a) resulted in a slight diminution in enan-
tiomeric excess. Lower enantioselection was observed when the
oxazoline substituent R was changed from tert-butyl to isopropyl
(2c) or benzyl (2d), but [Cu((S,S)-Ph-box)](X)2 complexes 1b
(X ) OTf) and 2b (X ) SbF6) were both highly selective. Chiral
HPLC analysis indicated that the major enantiomer produced
by [Cu((S,S)-t-Bu-box)](X)2 complexes 1a or 2a was opposite
to the one obtained with all other catalysts. The absolute
stereochemistry was subsequently established by chemical
methods to be that shown in Table 2 (vide infra).
While phenyl- and tert-butyl-substituted catalysts confer
similar levels of enantioselection, a marked difference in their
reactivity has been noted. Specifically, [Cu((S,S)-t-Bu-box)]-
(OTf)2 complex 1a effects complete conversion in 48 h at -78
°C (eq 12), while [Cu((S,S)-Ph-box)](OTf)2 complex 1b requires
only 4 h at the same temperature. The complexes possessing
the hexafluoroantimonate counterion (2) were uniformly more
reactive than those complexes with the triflate anion (1), in
accord with previous findings from our laboratory (e.g., 1a, 48
h; 2a, 22 h).21
(9) (a) Evans, D. A.; Kazlowski, M. C.; Burgey, C. S.; MacMillan, D.
W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7893. (b) Evans, D. A.; Burgey, C. S.;
Kozlowski, M. C.; Tregay, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 686.
(10) (a) Boger, D. L.; Robarge, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3373. (b)
Boger, D. L.; Robarge, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5793.
(11) (a) Schuster, T.; Evans, S. A. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.
1995, 103, 259. (b) Telan, L. A.; Poon, C. D.; Evans, S. A. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 7455.
(12) Thorhauge, J.; Johannsen, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2404.
(13) A portion of this work has been previously communicated: (b)
Evans, D. A.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4895. (b) Evans,
D. A.; Olhava, E. J.; Johnson, J. S.; Janey, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1998, 37, 3372. (c) Evans, D. A.; Johnson, J. S.; Burgey, C. S.;
Campos, K. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2879.
(16) Among those tried: P(OMe)3, PhMe, 0 °C (ref 11a); P(OMe)2-
(OTMS), PhMe, 0 °C (Evans, D. A.; Hurst, K. M.; Takacs, J. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3467).
(17) Li, Y.-F.; Hammerschmidt, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4,
109.
(18) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. v. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505.
(19) Cationic copper(II) complexes were prepared as described previ-
ously. See: (a) Reference 9b. (b) Evans, D. A.; Peterson, G. S.; Johnson,
J. S.; Barnes, D. M.; Campos, K. R.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 4541.
(20) Washing the organic layer with aqueous NH4OH sequesters the Cu-
(II) and allows for recovery of the ligand. Assays of diastereomeric and
enantiomeric excess were performed prior to flash chromatography.
(21) Evans, D. A.; Murry, J. A.; von Matt, P.; Norcross, R. D.; Miller,
S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 798.
(14) Karaman, R.; Goldblum, A.; Breuer, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1989, 765 and references therein.
(15) Szpala, A.; Tebby, J. C.; Griffiths, D. V. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1981, 1363.