a hetero-Michael reaction between the corresponding ni-
troolefin and an allylic alcohol or amine.
asymmetric conjugate addition via enamine activation (Fig-
ure 1).10
Because the cyclization step proceeds with total diaste-
reoselectivity,7 we reasoned that this useful methodology
could be in principle translated to a versatile enantioselective
carbocyclization version providing the control of the Michael
addition of a properly functionalized carbonucleophile 5 to
a simple nitroolefin 4 (Scheme 2). The resulting enantio-
Figure 1. Pyrrolidine-type organocatalysts.
Scheme 2
Therefore, in order to validate our strategy, we selected
nitrosyrene (4a) and 4-pentenal (5a) as test substrates to study
this reaction with different organocatalysts. The results are
summarized in Table 1. Various reaction conditions were
Table 1. Catalyst and Solvent Optimization for the
Enantioselective Michael Additiona
merically enriched unsaturated nitoalkanes 6 could be easily
cyclized stereoselectively to the corresponding fused-isox-
azoline precursor of the expected functionalized carbocycles.
Over recent years, very important developments of asym-
metric Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroolefins have
emerged.8,9 Chiral amines such as pyrrolidine analogues
constitute a broadly applicable class of organocatalysts for
entry
catalyst
2 mol %
2 mol %
20 mol %
20 mol %
solvent yield (%)b
drc
ee (%)d
1
2
3
4
A
A
B
C
water
water
iPrOH
DCM
97e
98f
95
92:8
91:9
10:1
98:2
99
99
40
95
92
(4) (a) Guillaume, M.; Dumez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Dulce`re, J.-P. Synlett
2002, n/a, 1183–1185. (b) Dulce`re, J.-P.; Dumez, E. Chem. Commun. 1997,
971–972. (c) Dumez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Dulce`re, J.-P. Chem. Commun. 1997,
n/a, 1831–1832. (d) Dumez, E.; Faure, R.; Dulce`re, J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 257, 7–2588.
a Reaction conditions: 1 mmol of 4a, 2 mmol of 5a and catalyst A, B,
or C in 2 mL of solvent at 0 °C. b Isolated yield by flash chromatography.
c Determined by proton NMR of the crude reaction product. d Determined
by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. e 10 mol % of PhCO2H was used.
f 20 mol % of PhCO2H was used.
(5) For examples of the use of silylnitronate in synthesis, see: (a) Torssell,
K.; Zeuthen, O. Acta Chem. Scand. 1978, B33, 379. (b) Das, N. B.; Torssell,
K. B. G. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2227–2230. (c) Torsell, K. B. G.; Hazell,
A. C.; Hazell, R. G. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5569. (d) Uno, H.; Watanabe,
N.; Fujiki, S.; Suzuki, H. Synthesis 1987, n/a, 471–474. (e) Ishikawa, T.;
Shimizu, Y.; Kudoh, T.; Saito, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3879–3882. (f) Kudoh,
T.; Ishikawa, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Saito, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3875–3878.
(6) Roger, P.-Y.; Durand, A.-C.; Rodriguez, J.; Dulce`re, J.-P. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 2027–2029.
tested, and it clearly appeared that catalyst A in combination
with benzoic acid as the additive in water9a (entries 1 and
2) and catalyst C in DCM9g (entry 4) were the best way to
achieve high levels of diastereoselectivity and enantioselec-
tivity along with excellent yields. Catalyst B9k was efficient
(yield ) 95%, entry 3) but showed only moderate enanti-
oselectivity. The best conditions for this enantioselective
transformation (entry 2) having been identified, they were
applied to diversely substituted nitroalkenes and different
unsaturated aldehydes. The resulting γ-nitroaldehydes
(6b-g) are represented in Figure 2. The aromatic-substituted
nitroolefins worked well in this reaction with high yields and
very good levels of diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity,
except when 2-(2-nitrovinyl)furan 4d was engaged, which
resulted in the formation of 6d with slightly lower yield and
enantioselectivity. Aliphatic-substituted nitroolefin 4e and
ꢀ-nitroacrylate 4f are also suitable substrates for this
transformation, leading to 6e and 6f, respectively. Finally,
the variation in the aldehyde structure either by increasing
(7) Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1841–1860.
(8) For recent reviews on asymmetric organocatalyzed conjugate addi-
tions, see: (a) Tsogoeva, S. B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1701–1716. (b)
Sulzer-Mosse´, S.; Alexakis, A. Chem. Commun. 2007, n/a, 3123–3135. (c)
Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis 2007, 2065–2092. (d) Almasi,
D.; Alonso, D. A.; Na´jera, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 299–365
.
(9) For recent examples of conjugate additions between aldehydes and
nitroolefins with organocatalysts, see: (a) Zhu, S. L.; Yu, S. Y.; Ma, D. W.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 3, 545–548. (b) Wiesner, M.; Revell, J. D.;
Wennemers, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 10, 1871–1874. (c) Barros,
M. T.; Phillips, A. M. F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 17, 8–185. (d) McCooey,
S. H.; Connon, S. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 599–602. (e) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh,
H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 27, 4212–4215.
(f) Lalonde, M. P.; Chen, Y. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 38, 6366–6370. (g) Palomo, C.; Vera, S.; Mielgo, A.; Gomez-Bengoa,
E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 36, 5984–5987. (h) Mosse´, S.; Laars, M.;
Kriis, K.; Kanger, T.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2559–2562. (i) Mase,
N.; Watanabe, K.; Yoda, H.; Takabe, K.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4966. (j) Wang, J.; Li, J.; Lou, B.; Zu, L.;
Guo, H.; Wang, W. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4321. (k) Wang, W.; Wang,
J.; Li, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1369. (l) Andrey, O.; Alexakis,
A.; Tomassini, A.; Bernardinelli, G. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1147.
(m) Mase, N.; Thayumanavan, R.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 2527. (n) Alexakis, A.; Andrey, O. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3611. (o)
(10) Mukherjee, S.; Yang, J. W.; Hoffmann, S.; List, B. Chem. ReV.
2007, 107, 5471–5569.
Betancourt, J. M.; Barbas, C. F., III Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3737
.
5410
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 23, 2008