means that Raman spectroscopy is in theory an effective
means to measure concentration changes in a dynamic
system. Additionally, in terms of practicality, borosilicate
glass is essentially transparent to a Raman spectrometer and
this allows the use of standard laboratory glassware. Despite
these advantages, while quantitative in situ infrared spec-
troscopy (e.g., ReactIR) has seen significant use for deter-
mination of reaction kinetics,6 there are very few reports of
analogous studies with Raman spectroscopy.7 Recent ad-
vances in Raman spectroscopy now allow for data acquisition
at such a rate that quantitative data can be extracted. In
addition, microwave heating is also an ideal tool for
performing kinetic studies since it offers reproducible,
noncontact heating as well as precise temperature monitoring
and data recording.8 As a result we have become interested
in using microwave-interfaced, in situ Raman spectroscopy
for quantitative studies and have recently described a robust
method to derive precise kinetic data for organic transforma-
tions.9 In this letter we show further the validity of our
methods for determing kinetic data by using established pKa
data as a standard to which to compare our results.
work we use an open-vessel arrangement. Although this
limits the temperature range to that from room temperature
to the boiling points of solvents, the open-vessel format
allows for a quantitative reaction start time as the catalyst is
injected into the sample.
Starting with benzaldehyde and acetophenone as test
substrates yielding trans-chalcone as product, our initial
objective was to determine a calibration curve to transform
units of Raman signal intensity to the standard kinetic
parameters of concentration.10 Since Raman signal strength
when measuring only the Stokes shift is inversely propor-
tional to temperature, it was necessary to derive calibration
curves at each temperature the reaction would be monitored.
This process was repeated for each chalcone product that
would form part of our study.
We next turned our attention to monitoring the reactions.
To ensure accurate and reproducible results, a stock solution
of the appropriate benzaldehyde and acetophenone in ethanol
was prepared from which 20 trials were performed. We ran
four trials at each of five temperatures.11 Raw spectral data
were converted from units of Raman intensity·s-1 to standard
units of rate (mol·L-1·min-1). With this kinetic data in hand,
the Arrhenius plot of ln k vs 1/T was plotted for each reaction
studied from which activation energies were calculated (m
) -Ea/R, R ) 8.314 J·M-1·K-1). Additionally, the Eyring
plot of ln (k/T) vs 1/T was constructed for each reaction,
from which the activation enthalpy, ∆Hq, could be deter-
mined.12 As an example, the condensation between ac-
etophenone and benzaldehyde to yield chalcone was calcu-
lated to have an activation enthalpy of 49.0 kJ/mol (Figure
2), which is in good agreement for the previously reported
value of 11.6 kcal/mol (48.5 kJ/mol).13
Scheme 1. Claisen-Schmidt Condensation
We chose to examine the Claisen-Schmidt condensation
between an aromatic aldehyde and enolizable acetophenones
(Scheme 1). The polarizable R,ꢀ-unsaturated ketone moiety of
the chalcone system is highly Raman active and gives a
characteristic signal at approximately 1600 cm-1, thus allowing
us to follow the reaction easily in real time (Figure 1).
We calculated activation enthalpies for a wide range of
substituted chalcones. After a few initial studies, we observed
that the substitution on the acetophenone played a larger role
in dictating the activation enthalpies than that on the aldehyde
component. This is not unexpected since the rate-determining
step of the reaction is proportional to the concentration of
(7) (a) Waal, D. D.; Heynes, A. M. J. Solid State Chem. 1989, 80, 170.
(b) Ehly, M. E.; Gemperline, P. J.; Nordon, A.; Littlejohn, D.; Basford,
J. K.; De Cecco, M. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 595, 80.
(8) For a recent kinetic study of a microwave-promoted reaction not
involving in situ spectroscopy see: Gilday, J. P.; Lenden, P.; Moseley, J. D.;
Cox, B. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3130.
(9) Schmink, J. R.; Holcomb, J. L.; Leadbeater, N. E. Chem. Eur. J.
2008, 14, 9943.
(10) To achieve this, solutions of known concentrations of trans-chalcone
in ethanol were prepared. They were placed sequentially inside a round-
bottomed flask inside the microwave cavity and brought to reflux by using
microwave heating and then the Raman spectrum was collected. After
subtraction of signals due to the solvent, a plot of signal intensity at 1598
cm-1 vs concentration was constructed.
Figure 1. Typical three-dimensional Raman spectrum in the
“fingerprint” region from 250 to 2250 cm-1 generated during the
first 140 s of the Claisen-Schmidt condensation.
(11) Stock solution (25 mL) was placed in a standard 50 mL capacity
round-bottomed flask with a Teflon-coated stir bar, and this was placed
into the microwave cavity. It was then heated to the desired temperature at
which point a dark scan was taken. Next, the appropriate amount of sodium
hydroxide catalyst in a small volume of water was injected and Raman
spectra collected automatically at ∼7 s intervals. The initial rate of reaction
was determined by using the first few scans; generally under 1 min is all
that is needed. As such, all 20 data points for a pair of substrates could be
generated in a time period of less than 2 h.
(12) Bernasconi, C. F., Ed. InVestigations of Rates and Mechanisms of
Reactions, Part 1; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1986.
(13) Noyce, D. S.; Pryor, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1397.
(14) Coombs, E.; Evans, D. P. J. Chem. Soc. 1940, 1295.
While the majority of microwave-promoted reactions are
performed with use of sealed tubes, to perform quantitative
(6) For selected recent examples see: (a) Denmark, S. E.; Pham, S. M.;
Stavenger, R. A.; Su, X. P.; Wong, K. T.; Nishigaichi, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 3904. (b) Grabarnick, M.; Zamir, S. Org. Proc. Res. DeV. 2003,
7, 237. (c) Almeida, A. R.; Moulijn, J. A.; Mul, G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008,
112, 1552. (d) Tibiletti, D.; Meunier, F. C.; Goguet, A.; Reid, D.; Burch,
R.; Boaro, M.; Vicario, M.; Trovarelli, A. J. Catal. 2006, 244, 183.
366
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 2, 2009