hydrophilic4a,b or via a 1,4-dipiperazino benzene scaffold.4c
Our design focuses on two variations of a novel 5-6-5
imidazole-phenyl-thiazole scaffold that replaces six-mem-
bered aromatic end units with water-soluble five-membered
heterocyclic groups.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Model 5-6-5 Scaffold 4
Using this novel class of R-helix mimetics, we have chosen
to target a protein-protein interaction governed largely by
hydrophilic contacts, that between Cdc42 (cell division cycle
42) and Dbs (Dbl’s big sister).5 Cdc42 is a GTPase (guanine
nucleotide triphosphatase) shown to mediate cancer cell
resistance to both cytotoxic therapies and cytotoxic T-
lymphocyte induced tumor suppression.6 Cdc42 has also been
linked to diabetes and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative
diseases.7 However, Cdc42 is only capable of these aberrant
activites in its activated, GTP-bound, form.7 Cdc42 is
activated by interaction with the GEF (guanine nucleotide
exchange factor), Dbs. We chose to target the Cdc42-Dbs
interaction in an effort to block the most upstream event
involved in Cdc42-related disease. In addition, to the best
of our knowledge, no rationally designed small molecule
inhibitors of this protein-protein interaction currently exist.
The interaction between these proteins is mediated by the
Q770, K774, and L777 residues of Dbs, which correspond
to the i, i + 4, and i + 7 of a key Dbs R-helix, making it an
appropriate target for our mimetics (Figure 1c).5 Herein we
Scheme 1 depicts the synthetic route to a model derivative,
4-methyl-2-(2-methyl-4-(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)phe-
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 12
Figure 1. (a) Energy minimized polyalanine R-helix displaying i,
i + 4, and i + 7 positions. (b) Energy minimized structure of 4.
(c) Overlay of energy minimized 4 onto targeted region of Dbs,
residues Q770, K774, and L777.
detail the design and synthesis of a 5-6-5 imidazole-phenyl-
thiazole based, water soluble R-helix mimetic of these key
residues.
(4) (a) Volonterio, A.; Moisan, L.; Rebek, J., Jr Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3733–
3736. (b) Biros, S. M.; Moisan, L.; Mann, E.; Carella, A.; Zhai, D.; Reed,
J. C.; Rebek, J., Jr Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4641–4645. (c)
Maity, P.; Ko¨nig, B. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1473–1476.
(5) Rossman, K. L.; Worthylake, D. K.; Snyder, J. T.; Siderovski, D. P.;
Campbell, S. L.; Sondek, J. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 1315–1326.
(6) Marques, C. A.; Hahnel, P. S.; Wolfel, C.; Thaler, S.; Huber, C.;
Theobald, M.; Schuler, M. Blood 2008, 111, 1413–1419.
(7) Sinha, S.; Yang, W. Cell. Signalling 2008, 20, 1927–1934.
(8) Kouwer, P. H. J.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
14042–14052.
(9) Rudolph, J.; Chen, L.; Majumdar, D.; Bullock, W. H.; Burns, M.;
Claus, T.; Dela Cruz, F. E.; Daly, M.; Ehrgott, F. J.; Johnson, J. S.;
Livingston, J. N.; Schoenleber, R. W.; Shapiro, J.; Yang, L.; Tsutsumi,
M.; Ma, X. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 984–1000.
26
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 1, 2009