E. M. Casey et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 7021–7023
7023
Supplementary data
18
H
O
Si
O
15
O
O
H
Si
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
H
H
O
O
References and notes
Figure 1. Key NOE correlations used in stereochemical assignment of dioxasilocine
4.
1. West, L. M.; Northcote, P. T.; Battershill, C. N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 445.
2. Hood, K. A.; West, L. M.; Rouwé, B.; Northcote, P. T.; Berridge, M. V.; Wakefield,
S. J.; Miller, J. H. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3356.
3. (a) Gaitanos, T. N.; Buey, R. M.; Díaz, J. F.; Northcote, P. T.; Teesdale-Spittle, P.;
Andreu, J. M.; Miller, J. H. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 5063; (b) Wilmes, A.; Bargh, K.;
Kelly, C.; Northcote, P. T.; Miller, J. H. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 269.
4. Liao, X.; Wu, Y.; De Brabander, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1648.
5. Jin, M.; Taylor, R. E. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1303.
6. Ghosh, A. K.; Xu, X.; Kim, J.-H.; Xu, C.-X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1001.
7. (a) Paterson, I.; Di Francesco, M. E.; Kühn, T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 599; (b) Ghosh, A.
K.; Kim, J.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7659; (c) Taylor, R. E.; Jin, M. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4959; (d) Roulland, E.; Ermolenko, M. S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2225; (e)
Chen, Z.; Zhou, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5289.
LnRu
Ph
Ph
O Si
O
H
O
O
O
(15S,18R)-5
Si
H
O
4
Favoured TS
8. (a) Cordier, C.; Morton, D.; Leach, S.; Woodhall, T.; O’Leary-Steele, C.; Warriner,
S.; Nelson, A. Org. Biol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1734. and references therein; (b) Kim, Y.
J.; Lee, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5219; (c) Denmark, S. E.; Yang, S-M. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 1749.
9. (a) Boiteau, J.-G.; Van De Weghe, P.; Eustache, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 239;
(b) Van De Weghe, P.; Aoun, D.; Boiteau, J-G.; Eustache, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
4105.
Ph
LnRu
H
O
Si
Ph
O Si
O
O
O
(15S,18S)-5
H
O
10. Evans, P. A.; Cui, J.; Buffone, G. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2003, 42, 1734.
11. Paton, R. S.; Goodman, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1253.
12. Stocker, B. L.; Teesdale-Spittle, P.; Hoberg, J. O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 330.
13. (a) Suzuki, N.; Kondakov, D. Y.; Takahashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 155, 8485;
(b) Morken, J. P.; Didiuk, M. T.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6997.
14. Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Lister, M. A.; Schumann, R. C.; McClure, C. K.;
Norcross, R. D. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4663.
18-epi-4
Disfavoured TS
Figure 2. Proposed transition states for silyl-tethered ring closing metathesis
reactions of (15S,18R)-5 (favoured) and (15S,18S)-5 (disfavoured).
15. Synthesis of compound 5: To
a solution of dichlorodiphenylsilane (1.2 g,
4.7 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL) at 0 °C was added Et3N (350 mg, 3.5 mmol)
followed by a solution of alcohol ( )-6 (320 mg, 3.2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL).
The reaction mixture was then warmed to 40 °C and stirred for 48 h. After this
time, the reaction mixture was cooled again to 0 °C and Et3N (1.0 g, 10.0 mmol)
was added, followed by b-hydroxyketone (S)-714 (1.0 g, 8.0 mmol) as a solution
in CH2Cl2 (5 mL). The resulting solution was warmed to rt and was stirred
overnight before being quenched with satd aq NaHCO3 (20 mL). The two-phase
mixture was then separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2
(3 Â 30 mL). The organic fractions were combined and washed with sat. aq.
brine (2 Â 20 mL) and water (15 mL), then dried (MgSO4), filtered and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Gradient flash chromatography
(20:1–5:1 hexanes/EtOAc) provided diene 5 (980 mg, 76%) as a colourless oil.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.62 (m, 4H), 7.42 (m, 2H), 7.36 (m, 4H), 5.63 (m,
1H), 5.05–5.01 (complex m, 2H), 4.90 (m, 1H), 4.77–4.75 (complex m, 2H), 3.64
(d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (dd, J = 14.6, 5.1 Hz, 1H),
2.14 (m, 1H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.58 (m, 1H), 1.26 (m, 1H), 0.84 (t,
J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) d 206.6, 145.4, 139.96 and 139.92,
135.08 and 135.06, 132.74 and 132.65, 130.28 and 130.23, 127.75 and 127.68,
115.8, 112.28 and 112.27, 73.3, 66.2, 50.3, 47.89 and 47.88, 30.9, 23.5, 17.39
and 17.38, 11.5. IR (neat) 3100–2850, 1715, 1429, 1357, 1162, 1115, 1060, 997,
906, 740, 717, 699 cmÀ1 HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H32O3SiNa+ (M+Na)+
431.2013, found 431.2028.
transition state, where the ethyl group also resides in the pseud-
oequatorial position. Conversely, the diastereoisomeric diene
(15S,18S)-5 must adopt a disfavoured transition state, having steric
interactions between the pseudoaxial ethyl group and one of the
phenyl rings, and thus reacts more slowly.
In one particular RCM experiment, we found the yield of dioxa-
silocine 4 to be 53%. This may have been due to loss of fidelity in
the stereocontrol of the kinetic resolution, with a small quantity
of 18-epi-4 formed through a slow RCM process via the disfavoured
transition state. However, this undesired minor product could not
be detected by either GC or spectroscopic means. An alternative
explanation is that there was a small measure of diastereoselectiv-
ity in the formation of the silyl bis-ether 5, which led to a greater
proportion of (15S,18R)-5 in the diastereomeric mixture of starting
diene. It is anticipated that stereoselective preparation of R-6 for
incorporation into diene 5 will lead to the RCM product in high
yield; yet the resolution process described above has merit as it
proceeds without the requirement for the costly (EBTHI)ZrCl2
catalyst.
In summary, we have completed the synthesis of the C12–C24
fragment of peloruside A in a form suitable for aldol coupling to
the C1–C11 portion. Ring closing metathesis using a silyl-tethered
diene provided target dioxasilocine 4 with the correct stereochem-
istry through kinetic resolution of a diastereoisomeric mixture of
diene 5.
16. (a) Grubbs, R. H. personal communication 2005; (b) Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron
2004, 60, 7117.
17. Synthesis of compound 4: To a solution of Grubbs’ second generation catalyst
(25 mg, 0.029 mmol) in refluxing CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added diene 5 (120 mg,
0.32 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) dropwise over 24 h. The refluxing solution was
then stirred for a further 24 h before being cooled to rt, and the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was redissolved in
10:1 hexanes/EtOAc and was filtered through a pad of silica gel. Activated
charcoal (50 wt. equiv) was then added, the suspension was stirred for 24 h,
then filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Flash
chromatography (50:1 hexanes/EtOAc) provided the dioxasilocine 4 (56 mg,
53%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.60 (m, 4H), 7.42–7.34
(complex m, 6H), 5.40 (dd, J = 8.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (dd, J = 8.9, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.09
(dd, J = 10.6, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.1 Hz, 1H),
2.75 (m, 1H), 2.61 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.71 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3H),
1.35 (m, 1H), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.90 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) d 207.5,
138.5, 134.7, 134.5, 134.40, 134.35, 134.31, 134.0, 133.5, 130.00, 129.95, 127.9,
127.8, 127.71, 127.65, 69.9, 67.5, 48.2, 42.5, 31.1, 24.7, 19.1, 12.0. IR (neat)
3070–2870, 1716, 1591, 1429, 1122, 739, 716 cmÀ1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for
C23H29O3Si+ (M+H)+ 381.1881, found 381.1862.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Foundation for Research, Science
and Technology, New Zealand is gratefully acknowledged. We sin-
cerely thank Dr. Bridget Stocker for synthesis advice, and Associate
Professor Peter Northcote and Dr. John Ryan for sharing their NMR
expertise.