C. Haurena et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 7121–7123
7123
F. L.; Schoemaker, H. E.; Blaauw, R. H.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005,
3, 3435–3467; (e) Kazmaier, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2186–2188.
2. (a) Williams, R. M. Synthesis of Optically Active Amino Acids; Pergamon Press,
Oxford University Press, 1989; (b) Duthaler, R. O. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1539–
1650; (c) Fornicola, R. S.; Oblinger, E.; Montgomery, J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
3528–3529; (d) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8,
3646–3652; (e) Park, H.; Jeong, B.; Yoo, M. S.; Lee, J.; Park, M.; Lee, Y. J.; Kim, M.;
Jew, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3036–3038.
Zn dust
N
Br
+
O
H
CoBr2 10 mol%
CO2Et
EtO2C
+
EtO2C
N
H
CH3CN, 50 °C
N
3. (a) Petasis, N. A.; Akritopoulou, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 583–586; (b)
Petasis, N. A.; Goodman, A.; Zavialov, I. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 48, 16463–16470;
(c) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 445–446; (d) Petasis,
N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11798–11799; (e) Petasis, N. A.;
Boral, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 539–542; (f) Prakash, G. K. S.; Mandal, M.;
Schweizer, S.; Petasis, N. A.; Olah, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3718–3723.
4. Nanda, K. K.; Trotter, B. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2025–2028.
5. Grigg, R.; Sridharan, V.; Thayaparan, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 9017–9019.
6. Katritzky described the displacement of preformed benzotriazole-derived
iminium equivalents by organometallics for the synthesis of phenylglycine
and phenylalanine derivatives, see: (a) Katritzky, A. R.; Urogdi, L.; Mayence, A.
Synthesis 1989, 323–327.
7. (a) Le Gall, E.; Troupel, M.; Nédélec, J.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2497–2500;
(b) Le Gall, E.; Troupel, M.; Nedelec, J.-Y. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 9953–9965; (c)
Sengmany, S.; Le Gall, E.; Le Jean, C.; Troupel, M.; Nédélec, J.-Y. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 3672–3681; (d) Sengmany, S.; Le Gall, E.; Troupel, M. Synlett 2008,
1031–1035.
Scheme 2.
performs as well with phenyl bearing both electron-withdrawing
and electron-donating groups. The position of the substituent does
not influence the course of the reaction and it has to be noted that
even hindered benzyl bromides can undergo the coupling (entry
10). Furthermore, the possibility to operate with p-anisidine as
the amine provides a potential instant access to phenylalanine
derivatives by oxidative deprotection of the PMP group (entry 7).12
However, the procedure presents some limitations. A major
drawback concerns the absence of coupling between primary
amines, glyoxylate and aromatic organozinc reagents (entry 5).
This is likely due to the formation of an imine, which is not reactive
towards arylzinc reagents. This limited reactivity of non-activated
imines towards nucleophiles is a well-known issue. Another limi-
tation is the impossibility to realize three-component couplings
involving aryl bromides under Barbier-like conditions. Indeed, a
bis-amino ester resulting from the C-C reductive coupling of the
formal iminium ion under such reductive conditions (presence of
Zn dust) is the major product of the reaction (Scheme 2).
In conclusion, this work demonstrates that preformed or in situ-
generated organozinc reagents can be very convenient nucleo-
philes in three-component couplings with ethyl glyoxylate and
amines. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first
example of the use of organozinc reagents in such a multicompo-
nent procedure leading to a-amino acid derivatives. The develop-
ment of an enantioselective version of the reaction is ongoing
and will be reported in due course.
8. Organozinc reagents are known to be alkaline compounds.
9. Fillon, H.; Gosmini, C.; Périchon, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3867–3870.
10. General procedure starting from aryl bromides: A dried 100 mL round-bottomed
flask was flushed with argon and charged with acetonitrile (40 mL). Cobalt
bromide (0.66 g, 3 mmol), zinc bromide (0.68 g, 3 mmol), phenyl bromide
(0.32 mL, 3 mmol), zinc dust (6 g, 92 mmol) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid
(0.2 mL) were added to the solution under vigorous stirring (ca. ꢀ500 rpm).
After ca. 15 min, the aryl bromide (30 mmol) was added to the solution and as
soon as the exothermic reaction had began (ca. 5 min), a water bath at room
temperature was used to moderate the temperature of the medium. After
30 min, stirring was stopped and the surrounding solution was taken up using
a syringe and transferred into another flask containing the amine (10 mmol)
and ethyl glyoxylate (ꢀ50% solution in toluene, 2.6 mL, ꢀ13 mmol) in 10 mL
acetonitrile. After 5 min at room temperature, the mixture was heated at 50 °C
for 3–4 h using an oil bath. The reaction was then quenched with a saturated
ammonium chloride solution (150 mL) and the organic products extracted
with dichloromethane (2 Â 100 mL). After removal of the solvent,
a
chromatographic purification on neutral alumina using pentane/
a
dichloromethane mixture as an eluant (80/20?10/90) afforded the pure
product.
11. General procedure starting from benzyl bromides:
A dried 100 mL round-
bottomed flask was flushed with argon and charged with acetonitrile
(40 mL). Zinc dust (2 g, 30 mmol) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (0.2 mL)
were added under vigorous stirring (ca. ꢀ500 rpm). After 5 min, the amine
(10 mmol), ethyl glyoxylate (ꢀ50% solution in toluene, 2.6 mL, ꢀ13 mmol) and
the functionalized benzyl bromide (22 mmol) were added to the solution and
allowed to react for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with
a saturated ammonium chloride solution (150 mL) and the organic products
extracted with dichloromethane (2 Â 100 mL). After removal of the solvent, a
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr. Jacques Royer (Université Paris Des-
cartes) for helpful discussions.
chromatographic purification on neutral alumina using
dichloromethane mixture as an eluant (80/20?10/90) afforded the pure
product. Alternatively, the pure
-amino ester could be obtained from the
a
pentane/
References and notes
a
crude oil using an acid-base work-up, as detailled in Ref. 7b.
12. (a) De Lamo Marin, S.; Martens, T.; Mioskowski, C.; Royer, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 10592–10595; (b) Verkade, J. M. M.; van Hemert, L. J. C.; Quaedflieg, P. J. L.
M.; Alsters, P. L.; van Delft, F. L.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
8109–8113.
1. For some selected examples, see: (a) Sardina, J. F.; Rapoport, H. Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 1825–1872; (b) Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Wolf, L. B.; Schoemaker, H. E. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 4197–4212; (c) Jarvo, E. R.; Miller, S. J. Tetrahedron 2002,
58, 2481–2495; (d) Kaiser, J.; Kinderman, S. S.; van Esseveldt, B. C. J.; van Delft,