A R T I C L E S
Moorthy et al.
product (0.15 g, 52%) as a colorless powder: IR (KBr, cm-1) 2920,
1603, 1442, 1388, 1022; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.09 (s,
FAB-MS m/z 1344 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd for C106H70: C, 94.75; H,
5.25. Found: C, 94.32; H, 5.53.
1
12H), 2.3 (s, 6H), 7.32-7.40 (m, 16H), 7.46-7.48 (m, 8H),
7.55-7.62 (m, 28H), 7.65-7.73 (m, 8H), 7.75 (t, J ) 5.0 Hz, 8H);
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 18.8, 20.0, 125.0, 127.0, 127.4,
128.4, 129.7, 129.9, 130.0, 131.3, 132.4, 132.8, 132.9, 137.0, 137.1,
137.2, 139.1, 140.2, 141.8; FAB-MS m/z 1550 (M+). Anal. Calcd
for C122H86: C, 94.41; H, 5.59. Found: C, 94.18; H, 5.75.
Synthesis of 6. This compound was prepared starting from
3,3′,5′,5′-tetraethynylbimesityl by following the general procedure
described above. 16 was used as the coupling partner with Pd(PPh3)4
(10 mol %) as the catalyst. Isolation and purification were carried
out as described for 5 above, yield 52%, deep yellow fluorescent
solid: IR (KBr, cm-1) 2920, 2179, 2050, 1607, 1511, 1435, 1245,
1
1032, 765; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.66 (s, 12H), 3.38 (s,
General Procedure for the 2-Fold Coupling of 3,3′-Diethy-
nylbimesityl with Aryl Bromide via Sonogashira Coupling. A
typical procedure for the synthesis of 2 is as follows. Sonogashira
coupling is described below for the synthesis of 2 as a representative
case.
6H), 3.96 (s, 12H), 7.14 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 8H), 7.37 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz,
8H), 7.43 (t, J ) 8.0 Hz, 8H), 7.66 (t, J ) 8.0 Hz, 8H), 7.77 (d, J
) 9.0 Hz, 8H), 8.90 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz, 8H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 19.9, 21.5, 55.4, 95.0, 99.0, 113.9, 117.8, 122.7, 125.5,
126.4, 126.9, 127.6, 130.3, 130.5, 132.3, 132.4, 137.9, 138.3, 138.6,
141.5, 159.2; FAB-MS m/z 1463 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C110H78O4:
C, 90.26; H, 5.37; O, 4.37. Found: C, 89.48; H, 5.60.
An oven-dried pressure tube was charged with 3,3′-diethynyl-
bimesityl (0.45 g, 1.57 mmol), 15 (1.88 g, 5.66 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4
(0.145 g, 8 mol%), CuI (0.006 g, 4 mol %), and Et3N:THF (20:10
mL) under a N2 atmosphere and sealed. The contents were heated
in an oil bath at 90 °C for 48 h. The reaction mixture turned yellow
in color within 10 min and then to yellow-brown with time. After
the usual workup, a short pad filtration over silica gel was performed
with petroleum ether to isolate the unreacted 9-bromo-10-pheny-
lanthracene and 9-phenylanthracene. Further elution with chloro-
form yielded a mixture of mono- and dicoupled products. Careful
silica gel column chromatography of the mixture with 10%
dichloromethane in petroleum ether led to a small amount of the
monocoupled product first (10-15%) followed by the required
difunctionalized bimesitylene 2 as a bright yellow solid. It was
further purified by precipitation of its solution in dichloromethane/
chloroform using ethanol, yield 0.63 g (51%): 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 2.04 (s, 6H), 2.47 (s, 6H), 2.83 (s, 6H), 7.20 (s, 2H),
7.37-7.45 (m, 10H), 7.54-7.61 (m, 8H), 7.68 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz,
4H), 8.86 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
19.1, 20.4, 21.9, 94.4, 99.5, 118.4, 121.6, 125.5, 126.2, 127.0, 127.4,
127.6, 128.4, 129.0, 130.0, 131.2, 132.1, 136.4, 137.4, 138.0, 138.1,
138.6, 139.1; FAB-MS m/z 790 (M+); HRMS m/z calcd for C62H46
790.3600, found 790.3616 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C62H46: C, 94.14;
H, 5.86. Found: C, 94.19; H, 5.67.
Synthesis of 7. This compound was prepared starting from
3,3′,5′,5′-tetraethynylbimesityl by following the general procedure
described above. 17 was used as the coupling partner with Pd(PPh3)4
(10 mol %) as the catalyst. Isolation and purification were carried
out as described for 5 above, yield 54%, bright orange red powder:
IR (KBr, cm-1) 2922, 2367, 2182, 1597, 1435, 1023, 758; 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.64 (s, 12H), 3.36 (s, 6H), 7.43-7.48 (m,
12H), 7.67-7.70 (m, 16H), 7.80-7.81 (m, 8H), 8.73-8.75 (m, 8H),
8.85-8.87 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 19.9, 21.6,
86.5, 95.1, 100.4, 102.5, 118.5, 118.9, 122.6, 123.4, 126.8, 127.0,
127.3, 127.4, 128.6, 128.7, 131.7, 132.2, 138.9, 141.8; FAB-MS
m/z 1439 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C114H70: C, 95.10; H, 4.90. Found:
C, 95.72; H, 4.83.
PL Quantum Yield Measurements in Solutions. For determi-
nation of fluorescence quantum yields, the solutions of bimesitylene-
based EMs 1-7 were prepared in cyclohexane (spectral grade) such
that their absorbance at λ ) 367 nm was ca. 0.025. These solutions
were deaerated using nitrogen gas before their fluorescence was
recorded at 298 K. The excitation wavelength was chosen as 367
nm for all the samples, and the emission in each case was recorded
in the right angle mode (375-650 nm). The quantum yield was
calculated from the following relation:
Synthesis of 3. This compound was prepared by following the
general procedure described above. 17 was used as the coupling
partner with Pd(PPh3)4 (8 mol %) as the catalyst. Isolation via silica
gel column chromatography and purification as described above
φu ) φs(As/Au)(Iu/Is)(ηu/ηs)2
(1)
where the subscripts “s” and “u” refer to standard and unknown
samples, Au and As to absorbances of the sample and the standard
at the excitation wavelength, Iu and Is to the integrated emission
intensities (i.e., areas under the emission curves) of the sample and
the standard, and ηu and ηs to the refractive indexes of the
corresponding solutions (pure solvents are assumed). Anthracene
was chosen as a reference for quantum yield determination, for
which the reported quantum yield in ethanol is 0.27.16
Electrochemical Measurements. The cyclic voltammetry ex-
periments were performed on a BAS-100 B electrochemical
analyzer. The data were collected and analyzed using electrochemi-
cal analysis software. All experiments were carried out in a three-
electrode compartment cell with a Pt wire counter electrode, a glassy
carbon working electrode, and a Ag/AgNO3 (0.1 M) reference
electrode at varying scan rates. The supporting electrolyte used was
0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate solution in dry
dichloromethane. The cell containing the solution of the sample (1
mM) and the supporting electrolyte was purged with a nitrogen
gas thoroughly before scanning for its oxidation and reduction
properties. For each determination, the CV was run independently
for ferrocene as a reference. The oxidation potentials of 1-7 were
subsequently determined from the average of the anodic and
cathodic peak potentials and were corrected according to the values
observed for ferrocene oxidation. The HOMO and LUMO values
were thus calculated with reference to the ferrocene oxidation
potential by using the following equations: EHOMO ) Eox + 4.8
eV; ELUMO ) EHOMO - Egopt. The HOMO of ferrocene lies at 4.8
eV.
1
for 2 yielded 3 in 62% yield, bright orange fluorescent solid: H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.03 (s, 6H), 2.45 (s, 6H), 2.82 (s,
6H), 7.20 (s, 2H), 7.42-7.48 (m, 6H), 7.60-7.66 (m, 8H),
7.77-7.79 (m, 4H), 8.69-8.71 (m, 4H), 8.79-8.81 (m, 4H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 19.1, 20.4, 21.9, 86.6, 94.4, 101.1,
102.2, 118.0, 119.4, 121.5, 123.5, 126.7, 126.8, 127.3, 127.4, 128.6,
128.7, 129.2, 131.7, 132.0, 132.1, 136.7, 137.4, 138.2, 139.2; FAB-
MS m/z 838 (M+); HRMS m/z calcd for C66H46 838.3600, found
836.3610 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C66H46: C, 94.47; H, 5.53. Found:
C, 94.26; H, 5.70.
Synthesis of 5. This compound was prepared starting from
3,3′,5′,5′-tetraethynylbimesityl by following the general procedure
described above. 15 was used as the coupling partner with Pd(PPh3)4
(10 mol %) as the catalyst. With a short pad filtration of the reaction
mixture over silica gel using petroleum ether, the unreacted
9-bromo-10-phenylanthracene and dehalogenated 9-phenylan-
thracene were isolated. Further filtration with CHCl3 yielded a
mixture of products, which was subjected to SiO2 column chro-
matography. Gradual elution with 2-10% chloroform/petroleum
ether led to a more polar component, which was identified as the
required bimesitylene 5. Further purification was accomplished via
precipitation of its solution in dichloromethane/chloroform, yield
59%, bright yellow fluorescent solid: IR (KBr, cm-1) 2921, 2362,
1
2183, 1435, 1024; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.68(s, 12H),
3.39 (s, 6H), 7.44 (m, 16H), 7.61 (m, 20H), 7.72 (d, J ) 8.8 Hz,
8H), 8.93 (d, J ) 8.8 Hz, 8H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
19.9, 21.5, 94.9, 99.0, 117.0, 118.0, 122.7, 125.6, 126.4, 126.9,
127.5, 127.6, 128.4, 130.0, 131.1, 132.3, 138.4, 138.5, 138.6, 141.5;
9
17332 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 51, 2008