In 2009, Scheidt et al. reported the synthesis of racemic 3,4-
dihydrocoumarins rac-2 by an NHC-catalyzed internal
redox process starting from the aryloxyacetaldehydes 1
(Scheme 1).4 Whereastheproducts wereisolated ingoodto
excellent yields, the development of an enantioselective
version of the protocol turned out to be challenging.5 As
such, an extensive screening of enantiopure NHCs never
resulted in an enantioenrichment of more than 10% ee.
This exemplifies the issue with the current lack of a
successful general catalytic system for such enantioselec-
tive NHC-catalyzed transformations.6
Scheme 2. Envisioned Approach for the Multicatalytic
Formation of Enantioenriched 3,4-Dihydrocoumarins 2
Scheme 1. Scheidt et al.’s Procedure for the Formation of
Racemic 3,4-Dihydrocoumarins rac-2a
form the active carbene from its precursor in the second
step might add to this challenge. (ii) The stereocenter
generated in the R-position to the aldehyde upon attack
of the enamine is destroyed in the subsequent NHC-
catalyzed step. As such, an approach as illustrated in
Scheme 2 is made difficult by the fact that, in order to
attain a highly enantioenriched product 2, it is a ne-
cessity that the initial addition step proceeds with good
stereoselectivity in the formation of the stereocenter
created on the Michael-acceptor part of 1.9 The cata-
lyst, controlling the formation of the stereocenters via
an enamine pathway, would be expected to primarily
control the stereocenter adjacent to aldehyde function-
ality. Therefore, excellent control of the stereocenter
the farthest away from the reactive enamine might be
difficult to obtain. (iii) Even though the 3,4-dihydro-
coumarins 2 have a simple molecular structure, the
envisioned process for their enantioselective synthesis
involves the formation and breaking of a number of
bonds. As such, a high yielding route to these com-
pounds can be challenging.
Despite these potential complications we decided to
investigate if the development of a highly enantiose-
lective formation of 3,4-dihydrocoumarins 2, through
a multicatalytic enamine/NHC sequence, was feasi-
ble. Our initial screening process was focused on de-
termining the optimal conditions for the initial ami-
nocatalyzed 1,4-addition (for optimization data, see
Supporting Information). Through screening of sol-
vents, acid additives, temperatures, and catalysts, we
established that catalyst 3a combined with catalytic
amounts of o-nitrobenzoic acid in o-xylene was opti-
mal for this initial step. Furthermore, the screening
of carbene precursors and bases established that the
carbene precursor 4 and DIPEA were superior for
catalyzing the subsequent internal redox reaction lead-
ing to 2 (Figure 1).
a Mes = mesityl.
Within the field of asymmetric organocatalysis, chiral
secondary amines have been employed as catalysts in a
range of diverse enantioselective functionalizations of en-
olizable aldehydes and enals.7 In this regard, the diaryl-
prolinol silyl ethers have proved to be general catalysts
for activating substrates by enamine or iminium-ion
intermediates.8 We envisioned that the unsuccessful pur-
suit of a chiral carbene for catalyzing the enantioselective
formation of 3,4-dihydrocoumarins (Scheme 1) might be
circumvented by merging the reactivity of enamines de-
rived from an enantiopure diarylprolinol silyl ether 3 with
the synthetic potential ofan achiral carbene (Scheme 2). As
such, the enantioselectivity would be induced in the step
preceding the NHC-catalyzed reaction.
However, as it appears from Scheme 2, such an ap-
proach entails three inherent issues: (i) The optical purity
introduced in the initial addition must be maintained
throughout the entire process. The necessity of a base to
(6) For selected examples on successful utilizations of enantioen-
riched NHCs in redox reactions employing R-functionalized aldehydes
as substrates, see: (a) He, M.; Beahn, B. J.; Bode, J. W. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 3817. (b) He, M.; Uc, G. J.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
15088. (c) Vora, H. A.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2860. (d)
Reynolds, N. T.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16406.
(7) For selected reviews on aminocatalysis, see: (a) Dalko, P. I.
Enantioselective Organocatalysis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2007. (b) Chem.
Rev. 2007, 107, 12, special issue on organocatalysis. (c) Melchiorre, P.;
Marigo, M.; Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6138.
(d) MacMillan, D. W. C. Nature 2008, 455, 304. (e) Bertelsen, S.; Jørgensen,
K. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2178. (f) Grondal, C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders,
D. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167.
(9) An apparent thought would be that this issue might be solved by
employment of a chiral primary amine salt to activate the ketone moiety
in 1 by formation of an iminium ion. However, we found that such a
process was not feasible.
(8) Jensen, K. L.; Dickmeiss, G.; Jiang, H.; Albrecht, Ł.; Jørgensen,
K. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 248.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 21, 2012
5527