6002
H. A. I. Yoshihara et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 6000–6003
acid, it will produce unique a2 and b2 ions when tagged peptides
are fragmented during tandem mass spectrometry. Abundant a2
and b2 ions, corresponding to the residual serine and tyrosine res-
idues of the tag, are observed with a QqTOF instrument when ana-
lyzing proteomic samples labeled using ester 1 and are a hallmark
of tagged N-terminal peptides. The incorporation of propargylgly-
cine instead could provide an even more distinct signature.
The performance of the new esters was assessed by small-scale
ligation reactions with Jurkat cell lysates, which were then ana-
lyzed by SDS-PAGE and blotted with streptavidin to detect the
incorporated tag (Fig. 1). At 1 mM, all the esters show comparable
or modest improvements in labeling compared to 1. However, at
higher concentrations the more soluble penta-Arg containing es-
ters (3, 4, and 5) showed significantly higher levels of labeling.
Redistribution of some of the Arg residues from the N- to the C-ter-
minal side of the ester (compare 3 vs 5) did not significantly alter
their performance. Ester 4, which introduces a propargylglycine
residue directly adjacent to the ligated protein’s N-terminus, does
not appear to perform as well with respect to labeling as 3 or 5 but
is still significantly better than 1. We note that esters 3, 4, and 5
caused some protein precipitation in cell lysates. It is known that
proteins containing N-terminal polyarginine tags are less thermo-
stable,22 but we could prevent precipitation by the addition of so-
dium chloride, urea or guanidinium chloride.
A
As a model to test the performance of a quantitation strategy
involving derivatization of a propargylglycine residue (Fig. 2a),
tripeptides consisting of (Ac)GlyTyr(NO2)Ala, a PEG linker and an
azide group were prepared. The derivatization of the propargylgly-
cine residue of 3 pre-bound to neutravidin in 96-well plates pro-
ceeded efficiently under typical conditions (Fig. 2b). The large
excess (250 equivalents or greater) of the azide-bearing nitrotyro-
sine peptide appears to ensure the complete reaction of the avidin-
immobilized 3, as standard curves using peptides containing
nitrotyrosine residues and pre-derivatized peptides showed simi-
lar sensitivity compared to standard curves prepared by on-plate
derivatization. Using this assay, 3 can be reliably detected at
30 nM, a level of sensitivity that allows quantitation of ligated N-
termini to an estimated lower limit of 0.2% of free N-termini in a
eukaryotic cell lysate. In practice, the material analyzed would be
a complex mixture of proteins, with some fraction N-terminally la-
beled and any residual unreacted tag removed by gel filtration.
In summary, we have developed new peptide esters as subtilig-
ase substrates for use in the proteomic labeling of free N-termini.
By incorporating several additional arginine residues, the solubility
of the peptides is markedly improved, and the ligation reaction can
be driven further by the addition of more ester. Adding propargyl-
glycine residues into the peptide esters allows the quantitiation of
the labeled N-termini by sandwich ELISA following derivatization
with a nitrotyrosine and azide containing peptide. These features
should to expand the utility of subtiligase for the study of proteol-
ysis and other PTMs of protein N-termini.
tagged protein
avidin
avidin
NO2
avidin
avidin
HO
"Click”
O
O
H
N
NH2
N3
O
N
H
N
H
O
O
O
N
N
Tyr(NO2)
N
tagged protein
avidin
avidin
avidin
avidin
ELISA for Nitrotyrosine
α -Tyr(NO2)
HRP
Acknowledgments
N
N
Tyr(NO2)
We wish to thank Pete Wildes, Nick Agard and Emily Crawford
for helpful discussions. Financial support was provided by the San-
dler Foundation, NIH (RO1 GM081051), and the Hartwell Founda-
tion. HAIY was supported in part by a Stewart Trust Cancer
Research Award from the UCSF Cancer Center.
N
tagged protein
avidin
avidin
avidin
avidin
Supplementary data
Nitrotyrosine ELISA
B
50000
25000
0
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Reinders, J.; Sickmann, A. Proteomics 2005, 5, 4052.
2. Bradshaw, R. A.; Brickey, W. W.; Walker, K. W. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23,
263.
3. Polevoda, B.; Sherman, F. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36479.
4. Towler, D. A.; Gordon, J. I.; Adams, S. P.; Glaser, L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1988, 57,
69.
10
100
1000
Concentration 3 (nM)
5. Dormeyer, W.; Mohammed, S.; Breukelen, B.; Krijgsveld, J.; Heck, A. J. J.
Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4634.
6. Enoksson, M.; Li, J.; Ivancic, M. M.; Timmer, J. C.; Wildfang, E.; Eroshkin, A.;
Salvesen, G. S.; Tao, W. A. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2850.
7. Gevaert, K.; Goethals, M.; Martens, L.; Van Damme, J.; Staes, A.; Thomas, G. R.;
Vandekerckhove, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 566.
Figure 2. Quantitation of tagging by derivatizationand ELISA. (A) Tagged proteins are
captured on an analytical scale in neutravidin-coated 96-well plates. The propargyl-
glycine residue is derivatized using a copper(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cyclization
reaction and the incorporated 3-nitrotyrosine is quantitated using an antibody
conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). (B) ELISA using peptide ester 3.