Notes and references
1 R. E. Ireland and R. H. Mueller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94,
5897. For reviews of the Ireland–Claisen rearrangement, see:
(a) S. Pereira and M. Srebnik, Aldrichimica Acta, 1993, 26, 17;
(b) Y. Chai, S. Hong, H. A. Lindsay, C. McFarland and
M. McIntosh, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 2905.
2 For a recent review of the Claisen rearrangement, see: A. M. Castro,
Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 2939.
3 D. Bourgeois, D. Craig, N. P. King and D. M. Mountford, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 618.
4 D. Craig and F. Grellepois, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 463.
5 D. Craig, F. Grellepois and A. J. P. White, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70,
6827.
6 D. Craig, N. P. King, J. T. Kley and D. M. Mountford, Synthesis,
2005, 3279.
7 D. Bourgeois, D. Craig, F. Grellepois, D. M. Mountford and
A. J. W. Stewart, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 483.
Fig. 3 Plot of lg[kS/kH] vs. s1
for dCr reactions of 1a–f.
Spara
8 For the first report of Ireland–Claisen rearrangement of an allylic
a-phenylsulfonylacetate followed by decarboxylation, which took
place in a separate step, see: A. H. Davidson, N. Eggleton and
I. H. Wallace, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, 378.
9 D. Craig, M. I. Lansdell and S. E. Lewis, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007,
48, 7861.
10 For an early study of substituent effects on the rate of ortho-Claisen
rearrangement of substituted cinnamyl phenyl ethers, see: W. N.
White and W. K. Fife, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 3846.
11 For substrates 1 having R ¼ 4-MeC6H4, 4-FC6H4, C6H5, 4-ClC6H4
and 4-BrC6H4, the cinnamyl alcohols were made by reduction of
the appropriate unsaturated ethyl esters using DIBAL-H; for
R ¼ 4-NCC6H4, NaBH4–CeCl3 was used to reduce the correspond-
ing aldehyde. The carbonyl reduction substrates were made by
Wittig reaction of EtO2CCHQPPh3 or OHCCHQPPh3 with the
corresponding benzaldehydes. Full experimental details are
provided in the ESIw.
12 D. Craig, F. Paina and S. C. Smith, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3408.
13 For high-temperature thermal decarboxylative Claisen rearrange-
ment reactions of b-keto ester-derived silyl enol ethers involving
silatropic rearrangement, see: R. M. Coates, L. O. Sandefur and
R. D Smillie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 1619.
14 We thank a referee for pointing out the importance of fitting the
data using nonlinear rather than linear least squares.
15 C. D. Ritchie and W. F. Sager, Prog. Phys. Org. Chem., 1964, 2,
323.
Indeed, the value for r determined in the present work is
similar in magnitude to that found for the hydrolysis of
substituted benzyl chlorides in aqueous ethanol.16
Acceleration of the Ireland–Claisen rearrangement of sub-
strates possessing an electron-donating substituent on the
distal position of the allylic moiety has been documented.
Curran et al. have shown17 that the presence of an oxygen
atom in this position leads to an increase in rate of one or more
orders of magnitude. This effect has been studied computa-
tionally,18 and has been described in terms of ‘‘vinylogous
anomeric’’ (p - s*) stabilisation17d,19 of an early transition-
state.20,21 In this model, there is significant weakening of the
allylic C–O bond, such that its scission may be significantly
more advanced than formation of the new C–C bond. This
induces positive charge character on the distal allylic carbon
atom, which is stabilised by more electron-donating substitu-
ents attached at that position.22 In the present work, the
rate enhancement observed for ketene acetals 5 possessing
electron-rich Ar is consistent with this analysis. The notion of
a dipolar transition-state is further supported by published
observations that an oxygen substituent at the allylic position
leads to reaction acceleration in the Claisen rearrangement,17e
and that solvent17e,21c and hydrogen-bonding additives17f
significantly affect the rate.
16 R. W. Alder, R. Baker and J. M. Brown, Mechanism in Organic
Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience, London, 1971.
17 (a) D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23, 4309; (b) D. P. Curran
and Y. Suh, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25, 4179; (c) D. P. Curran and
Y. Suh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 5002; (d) D. P. Curran and
Y. Suh, Carbohydr. Res., 1987, 171, 161; (e) R. M. Coates,
B. D. Rogers, S. J. Hobbs, D. P. Curran and D. R. Peck, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 1160; (f) D. P. Curran and H. K. Lung,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 6647.
18 (a) H. Y. Yoo and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
2877; (b) V. Aviyente and K. N. Houk, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001,
105, 383; (c) V. Aviyente, H. Y. Yoo and K. N. Houk, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 6121.
19 S. E. Denmark and M. S. Dappen, J. Org. Chem., 1984, 49, 798,
and references therein.
20 K. D. McMichael and G. L. Korver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101,
2746.
21 (a) J. J. Gajewski and N. D. Conrad, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101,
2747; (b) J. J. Gajewski and J. Emrani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984,
106, 5733; (c) J. J. Gajewski, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997, 30, 219.
22 M. P. Meyer, A. J. DelMonte and D. A. Singleton, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1999, 121, 10865.
In summary, we have shown that the first-order rate con-
stants for dCr reactions of 1 show a pronounced dependency
on s1 for the para-aryl substituent S, and therefore on the
electron-density of the aryl group. This is indicative of sig-
nificant positive charge development at the benzylic position
during rearrangement, and the magnitude of the effect is
substantially greater than that found in previous investigations
of structure–rate relationships in [3,3]-sigmatropic processes.
This research was supported by Evangelisches Studienwerk
e.V. Villigst (scholarship to N.K.S.). We thank Dr John C. de
Mello for valuable assistance with data analysis, and Mr
Richard N. Sheppard and Mr Peter R. Haycock for nmr
measurements.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
6056 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 6054–6056