Communications
carbonates (2’) with the reagent 1b (Table 2). Gratifyingly,
favoring conjugated products,as illustrated by the exclusive
isolation of adduct 4a [Eq. (1)] from carbonate 2b if no water
is added to the reaction mixture (Table 2,entry 7).
the desired palladium-catalyzed displacement chemistry fol-
lowed by mild in situ hydrolysis[3] proved effective for a wide
range of both primary and secondary allylic carbonate
Table 2: Reduction of allylic carbonates.
Entry
1
Substrate
Product
Yield [%][a]
76[b]
Entries 6–8 of Table 2 are consistent with net SN2’
displacement of carbonates with reagent 1b to give conju-
gated sulfonylhydrazones that are ultimately subject to
sigmatropic loss of dinitrogen,affording the unconjugated
products. For comparison,treatment of methyl 5-phenylpent-
1-en-3-yl carbonate with 1b under the optimal conditions
gives 5-phenylpent-1-ene (Table 2,entry 5),whereas treat-
ment of the corresponding alcohol,5-phenylpent-1-en-3-ol,
with 1a under Mitsunobu conditions affords the isomeric (E)-
5-phenylpent-2-ene as a result of direct SN2 displacement with
2
86
3
4
91
59[b,c]
[3,7]
1a,followed by loss of dinitrogen.
Vinyl epoxides also serve as substrates[13] for this palla-
dium-catalyzed synthesis of allylic diazenes. The use of
[Pd2(dba)3] in conjunction with 1a and cesium carbonate as
the base additive efficiently provided the desired reduction
product (Scheme 2). This chemistry provides a mild and
5
6
75
82[d]
7
54[d]
8
9
73[e]
68
[a] Yield of the isolated reduction product; average of two experiments.
[b] E:Z, 95:5. [c] Modified conditions: 1a (1 equiv) and Na2CO3
(10 mol%) used in place of 1b in CH2Cl2. [d] E:Z, 96:4. [e] C2 E:Z,
96:4; C5 E:Z, 95:5. TFE=trifluoroethanol, AcOH=acetic acid.
Scheme 2. Palladium-catalyzed conversion of allylic epoxides into
allylic diazenes and subsequent loss of N2. dba=dibenzylideneace-
tone.
substrates. Even highly sensitive substrates,such as the
doubly activated carbonates (Table 2,entries 6–8),were
successfully converted into the corresponding adducts (4,
Scheme 1) and hydrolyzed to give the desired reduction
products. Significantly,the use of analogous doubly activated
alcohol substrates under Mitsunobu reaction conditions or
metal hydride reduction of the corresponding carbonate
derivative resulted in significant decomposition and elimina-
tion.[7,10] For example,treatment of carbonate 2b with
tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium,tri- n-butylphosphine,
and ammonium formate in 1,4-dioxane led to significant
decomposition of the starting material and afforded < 15% of
the desired unconjugated product (compare to Table 2,
entry 7).[7,10] Furthermore,the regioselective reduction of
substrates (Table 2,entries 4–9) demonstrates the versatility
of this method in comparison to alternative free-radical-based
reductions,[7,11] which lead to complex mixtures of products.
Whereas the high level of stereoselectivity for E-alkene
products is due to the sigmatropic loss of dinitrogen from an
allylic diazene intermediate,[4b,12] the regiochemical prefer-
ence in the reduction reflects the initial adduct formation
highly stereoselective conversion of allylic epoxides into the
corresponding homoallylic alcohol products. As shown in
Scheme 2,reduction of optically active Z-allylic epoxide 8a
(> 98% ee) under the aforementioned reaction conditions
gave the desired syn-homoallylic alcohol 9a (> 98% ee) in
79% yield.[7] The product is isolated as the E alkene (> 98:2,
E:Z),as expected for fragmentation of allylic diazene
intermediates.[4b,12]
Additionally,treatment of the isomeric E-allylic epoxide
8b resulted in the stereoselective synthesis of the anti-
homoallylic alcohol derivative 9b [Eq. (2)].[7] It should be
noted that the use of formic acid as the reducing agent in the
palladium-catalyzed reduction of 8a affords the anti-diaste-
reoisomer 9b,[14] highlighting the distinction between the
reduction described herein and other related processes.
The aforementioned transformations highlight the poten-
tial development of catalytic asymmetric variants of this
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8909 –8912