T. Nemoto et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 6398–6401
6401
6. Dhawan, B. N.; Cesselin, F.; Raghubir, R.; Reisine, T.; Bradley, P. B.; Portghese, P.
S.; Hamon, M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1996, 48, 567.
7. Nagase, H.; Hayakawa, J.; Kawamura, K.; Kawai, K.; Takezawa, Y.; Matsuura, H.;
Tajima, C.; Endo, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46, 366.
8. Kawai, K.; Hayakawa, J.; Miyamoto, T.; Imamura, Y.; Yamane, S.; Wakita, H.;
Fujii, H.; Kawamura, K.; Matsuura, H.; Izumimoto, N.; Kobayashi, R.; Endo, T.;
Nagase, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 9188.
9. Nagase, H.; Watanabe, A.; Nemoto, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Osa, Y.; Sato, N.; Yoza, K.;
Kai, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2547.
In conclusion, the novel 6,14-epoxymorphinan derivative, NS22
was designed and synthesized to show affinity for all three opioid
receptors and induce its antinociceptive effect only through
oid receptor.
j opi-
Acknowledgments
10. Kawamura, K.; Kawai, K.; Miyamoto, T.; Ooshima, K.; Nagase, H. Heterocycles
1998, 48, 267.
We acknowledge the financial supports from Shorai Foundation
for Science and the Uehara Memorial Foundation. We also
acknowledge the Institute of Instrumental Analysis of Kitasato Uni-
versity, School of Pharmacy for its facilities.
11. N-[(17-Cyclopropylmethyl-6b,14-epoxy-3-hydroxymorphinan-6
a-
yl)methyl]benzamide (NS22): IR (film): 1645 cmÀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d:
;
0.04–0.18 (2H, m), 0.42–0.60 (2H, m), 0.93 (1H, m), 1.28 (1H, dt, J = 12.5,
2.0 Hz), 1.37 (1H, m), 1.51–1.90 (5H, m), 2.09 (1H, dt, J = 2.0, 12.5 Hz), 2.23 (1H,
dt, J = 4.5, 12.5 Hz), 2.34 (1H, dd, J = 7.0, 12.58 Hz), 2.52–2.62 (3H, m), 3.10 (1H,
d, J = 18.0 Hz), 3.70 (1H, d, J = 5.5 Hz), 3.85–4.02 (2H, m), 6.61 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz),
6.66 (1H, dd, J = 2.5, 8.0 Hz), 6.89 (1H, t, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.93 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz),
7.40–7.56 (3H, m), 7.81–7.88 (2H, m), one proton (OH) was not observed. MS
(FAB) m/z = 445 [M+H]+. HRMS (FAB) Calcd for C28H33N2O3 [M+H]+: 445.2491.
Found 445.2504.N-[(17-Cyclopropylmethyl-6b,14-epoxy-3-hydroxymorphinan-
References and notes
1. (a) Knapp, R. J.; Malatynska, E.; Fang, L.; Li, X.; Babin, E.; Nguyen, M.; Santoro,
G.; Varga, E. V.; Hruby, V. J.; Roeske, W. R.; Yamamura, H. I. Life Sci. 1994, 54,
PL463; (b) Wang, J. B.; Johnson, P. S.; Persico, A. M.; Hawkins, A. L.; Griffin, C. A.;
Uhl, G. R. FEBS Lett. 1994, 338, 217; (c) Mansson, E.; Bare, L.; Yang, D. M.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 202, 1431.
6
a-yl)methyl]benzamide hydrochloride (NS22ÁHCl): Mp 181–185 °C (dec). Anal.
Calcd for C28H32N2O3ÁHClÁ0.8H2O: C, 67.88; H, 7.04; N, 5.65. Found: C, 67.85; H,
7.16; N, 5.46.
2. Portghese, P. S. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1989, 10, 230.
12. Assessment of antinociception: To prevent tissue damage, we established a 30 s
(hot-plate test) or 10 s (tail-flick test) cut-off time. Each animal served as its
own control, and the latency to response was measured both before and after
drug administration. Antinociception was calculated as percentage of
antinociception according to the following formula: % antinociception = (test
3. Casy, A. F.; Beckett, A. H. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1954, 6, 986.
4. Beckett, A. H. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1956, 8, 848.
5. (a) Piercey, M. F.; Lahti, R. A.; Schroeder, L. A.; Einspahr, F. J.; Barsuhn, C. Life Sci.
1982, 31, 1197; (b) Lahti, R. A.; Mickelson, M. M.; McCall, J. M.; Von Voigtlander,
P. F. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1985, 109, 281; (c) Costello, G. F.; Main, B. G.; Barlow, J. J.;
Carroll, J. A.; Shaw, J. S. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1988, 151, 475; (d) Barber, A.;
Gottschlich, R. Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 1997, 6, 1351.
latency À pre-drug
latency)/(cut-off
time À pre-drug
latency) Â 100.
Antinociceptive response represents as the mean SEM of % antinociception.