D. Basa6aiah et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1125–1128
1127
recovered (B) catalysts are air stable, recoverable and
considerable effect on the stereodirection in comparison
with that of the chiral diamine 1.
1
reusable. A comparison of H and 13C NMR spectral
studies of the original chiral source 3 with that of A and
B clearly indicates that they may have similar structural
organization (the chiral diamine moiety is intact).19,22
The IR, 1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectral studies of A and
B indicate that these solids may have the same structure
(while determining the melting points we also found
that both A and B decompose at 126–129°C).22
(5)
In conclusion, we have successfully carried out the
borane-mediated asymmetric reduction of prochiral a-
halo ketones using (2S,5S)-1,3-diaza-2-phospha-2-oxo-
(3)
2-chloro-3-phenylbicyclo[3.3.0]octane 3 as a chiral
catalytic source. Although the exact structure of the
catalyst is not known at the moment, this work demon-
strates for the first time, the potential of N-P(ꢀO)Cl
framework as a chiral source to generate a recoverable,
reusable and air stable catalyst for the borane-mediated
enantioselective reduction processes. Further work in
the development of new chiral molecules based on the
N-P(ꢀO)Cl framework with a view to understanding
the actual structure of the catalyst and the mechanism
of this catalytic reduction process is now in progress in
our laboratory.
The most striking difference between the chiral source 3
and the solids A and B is their solubility profile (the
solids A and B are insoluble in most organic solvents
including hexanes, ether, chloroform, dichloromethane,
ethyl acetate, THF, methanol and water, while the
original chiral source 3 is soluble in ether, chloroform
and dichloromethane etc.). In both cases (solids A and
B), the 11B NMR spectrum shows a very weak broad
signal at l 2.80 indicating that the actual catalyst
(solids A or B), may not contain any boron species.
This weak signal may be attributed to the presence of
minor amounts of some boron species in the actual
catalysts (A or B). On the basis of these preliminary
studies, we assume that the catalyst (A or B) may not
be monomeric in nature.
Acknowledgements
We thank CSIR (New Delhi) for funding this research
project. We also thank the UGC (New Delhi) for the
Special Assistance Program in Organic Chemistry in the
School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Hyder-
abad. G.J.R and V.C. thank CSIR (New Delhi) for
their research fellowships.
It is worth mentioning here the interesting work of
Asami and co-workers24 who reported the use of chiral
b-diamines as catalysts for borane-mediated chiral
reductions of prochiral ketones. During this study they
reported that the reduction of acetophenone with
BH3·THF in the presence of (S)-2-anilinomethylpyrro-
lidine 1 (10 mol%) provided the desired secondary
alcohol in 14% enantiomeric purity. With a view to
understanding the mechanism and examining other
applications of the NP(ꢀO)Cl framework we performed
the borane-mediated reduction of acetophenone in the
References
1. Brown, H. C.; Jadhav, P. K.; Singaram, B. In Modern
Synthetic Methods; Scheffold, R., Ed.; Springer-Verlag:
Heidelberg, 1986; Vol. 4, pp. 307–356.
2. Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. Acc. Chem. Res.
1992, 25, 16–24.
presence
of
(2S,5S)-1,3-diaza-2-phospha-2-oxo-2-
3. Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S. J. Am. Chem.
chloro-3-phenylbicyclo(3.3.0)octane 3 (5 mol%). The
requisite secondary alcohol was obtained with enan-
tiomeric purity of 62% [(determined by HPLC analysis
using a Chiralcel-OD chiral column) [h]2D5 +27.5 (c 0.4,
MeOH) [lit.25 [h]D25 +37.7 (c 3.81, MeOH) (R)-configu-
ration 84% e.e.] (Eq. (5)). This experiment demonstrates
that the diazaborolidine is not generated in our reaction
and also indicates that the NP(ꢀO)N framework has a
Soc. 1987, 109, 5551–5553.
4. Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1998, 37, 1986–2012.
5. Singh, V. K. Synthesis 1992, 605–617.
6. Deloux, L.; Srebnik, M. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 763–784.
7. Nishizawa, M.; Noyori, R. In Comprehensive Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, 1991; Vol. 8, pp. 159–182.
(4)