The relative and absolute configurations of the stereo-
centers in 4a-d were determined unambiguously after
selective transformations15 into the oxazolidinones 6a-c
(Figure 2) and 1H NMR coupling constant measurements.16
of 4e into a known compound.16 The compound 4f was also
transformed after desilylation into the corresponding acety-
lenic alcohol 5f, the configuration of which has been
determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis. It could be
unequivocally concluded that the reaction of (()-1 with
imines (R,SS)-3e and (S,SS)-3f occurred from the Si face to
give stereoselectively the corresponding anti,anti or syn,anti
acetylenic stereotriad.
The addition of organometallic reagents onto tBS-imines has
been largely studied,18 and various models have been proposed
to rationalize the stereoselectivity of such processes. More
specifically, the influence of an oxygen or heteroatom func-
tionality in the imine electrophile is a matter of interest since
these groups can change the stereoinduction from the tert-
butanesulfinyl group, as reported, for example, by Ellman, who
observed a reversal of the stereofacial selectivity from simple
tBS-imines19 to R-alkoxy tBS-imines.20 The origins for the
inversion of the facial selectivity compared to simple alkyl tBS-
imines remain under discussion, and models involving E/Z
isomerization of imines as well as chelate versus open transition
states have been proposed to account for the atypical stereo-
chemical behavior. Moreover, it should be noted that this
inversion in stereoselectivity does not seem general: it has been
observed for tBS-imines derived from aldehydes bearing an
R-alkoxy10,18 or an R-chloro group,21 independent of the
organometallic species used (alkyl organometallics or eno-
lates). By contrast, it has not been observed in the case of
tBS-imines derived from aldehydes bearing an R-amino
group22 nor in the case of tBS-imines derived from ketones
bearing an R-alkoxy group.18b The reduction of tBS-imines
derived from ketones bearing an R-chloro group proceeds
with face selectivities depending on the nature of the reducing
agent.23 In our case, no inversion of the stereochemical
induction from the tBS group was noted, as the facial
selectivity was the same in all cases we studied: imines
(S,RS)-3a and (S,RS)-3b presenting a (R) configuration at the
sulfur center reacted with (()-1 on their Re face, whereas
products arising from the addition of imines (S,SS)-3c, (S,SS)-
3d, (R,SS)-3e, and (S,SS)-3f presenting a (S) configuration at
the sulfur center were obtained through reaction on the Si
face.
Figure 2. Oxazolidinones 6a-c for stereochemical correlations.
The multistep transformation of compound 4a into a known
compound17 was also performed.
The results reported above indicate that a high stereoin-
duction can be expected from the reaction of R-alkoxy tBS
imines with allenylzinc (()-1. To generalize this statement,
we then tried the reaction of the two diastereomeric imines
(R,SS)-3e and (S,SS)-3f derived from (+)- and (-)-mandelic
acid, respectively. The reaction occurred smoothly under the
same conditions as reported above, and here again, we
obtained only one diastereomer 4e or 4f, respectively
(Scheme 4).
Scheme 4. Reaction with Imines (R,SS)-3e and (S,SS)-3f
Another point of interest concerns the relative influence on
the stereofacial selectivity of the stereocenter R to the imine
compared to the sulfinyl chiral auxiliary. A Cram chelate versus
a Felkin-Anh model could presumably be involved, and the
two possibilities have also been reported by Ellman.12 Former
reports dealing with organometallic species addition on R-
alkoxy-10,12 or R-amino-tBS-imines20 bearing a stereocenter
Structural determinations analoguous to those reported in
the Figure 2 were conducted,14 including the transformation
(12) (a) Weix, D. J.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1317. (b) Weix,
D. J.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 157.
(18) For a general review on chiral sulfinimines, see: (a) Morton, D.;
Stockman, R. A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8869. (b) Ferreira, F.; Botuha, C.;
Chemla, F.; Pe´rez-Luna, A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, DOI: 10.1039/
B809772K.
(13) Evans, J. W.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9948.
(14) Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P.; Ellman, J. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1278.
(15) See the Supporting Information.
(19) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Ellman, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8883.
(20) (a) Barrow, J. C.; Ngo, P. L.; Pellicore, J. M.; Selnick, H. G.;
Nantermet, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2051. (b) Tang, T. P.;
Volkman, S. K.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8772.
(21) (a) Denolf, B.; Mangelinckx, S.; Tornoos, K. W.; De Kimpe, N.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3129. (d) Hodgson, D. M.; Kloesges, J.; Evans, B. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 2781.
(16) It is known that vicinal coupling constants in 4,5-disubstituted
oxazolidinones are higher for the cis (6-8 Hz) than for the trans isomer
(4-6 Hz); see: (a) Reference 3a and: (b) Foglia, T. A.; Swern, D. J. Org.
Chem. 1969, 34, 1680. (c) Futagawa, S.; Inui, T.; Shiba, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1973, 46, 3308. (d) Bonini, B. F.; Comes-Franchini, M.; Fochi,
M.; Laboroi, F.; Mazzanti, G.; Ricci, A.; Varchi, G. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 8008. (e) Poisson, J.-F.; Chemla, F.; Normant, J. F. Synlett 2001, 305.
(17) Poisson, J. F.; Normant, J.-F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1889.
(22) (a) Prakash, G. K. S.; Mandal, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
6538. (b) Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Hu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3119.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 4, 2009
933