Cut-off effect of phenolipid antioxidants
Mickaël Laguerre et al.
533
(250 rpm, 55°C) until complete dissolution of methyl chloro- (covered by aluminium foil) was then incubated for 10 min
genate. Candida antarctica lipase B (5% wt/wt; calculated at 37°C before fluorescence measurement (lex: 485/lem:
from the total weight of both substrates) was then added to 530 nm).
start the transesterification reaction. The suspensions were
Raw fluorescence was calculated for each well, subtracting
then heated at 55°C for 96 h under a nitrogen flow in order to the fluorescence background (without probe) from that mea-
eliminate continuously the formed methanol and favor the sured in presence of probe (Equation 1).
displacement of the reaction equilibrium towards the synthe-
sis. The final lipophilized esters were then purified in a two
step procedure. First, a liquid-liquid extraction using 250 ml
of hexane and 1000 ml of a solution of acetonitrile/water
(3 : 1, v/v) was realized to remove the fatty alcohol in excess.
In a second step, the alcohol traces were eliminated using
silica gel column chromatography (length 25 cm, i.d. 1.6 cm)
using toluene/ethyl acetate (90 : 10, v/v) as eluant. All recov-
ered esters were then characterized by mass spectrometry as
described by López Giraldo et al. [12]
Raw Fluo = Fluo (cells with probe) −
(1)
Fluo (cells without probe)
Given that the tested substances are likely to exert an influence
on the cell growth, a correction of the probe fluorescence by
the DNA content (mg DNA/well, see section on DNA Quan-
tification, below) was achieved using Equation 2.
Corrected FluoH2DCFDA
raw FluoH2DCFDA / DNA quantity (in μg) per well
=
(2)
Finally, to consider the potential effect of carrier solvent
(ethanol) which can act as antioxidant in some case,[14] the
corrected fluorescence was expressed as the percentage of
the control (with ethanol) (Equation 3).
Cell culture preparation
Dark 96-well microplates with flat and transparent bottoms
(Greiner, Frickenhausen, Allemagne) were seeded at a cellular
density of 10 000 cells/well. Cell cultures were allowed to
grow in DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with genta-
micin (50 mg/ml), amphotericin B (50 mg/ml) and fetal calf
serum (10%) at 37°C, 5% CO2 and 100% humidity.
FluoH2DCFDA (% of control) =
(3)
(Corrected FluoH2DCFDA ×100)/ FluoH2DCFDA of control
The antioxidant capacity was thus calculated as the per-
centage of fluorescence inhibition in presence of the tested
phenolic compared with the control (phenolic free, but con-
taining ethanol), this value being normalized by cell DNA
content.
Cell treatment with phenolic compounds
Phenolic compounds (chlorogenic acid and its methyl, butyl,
octyl, dodecyl and hexadecyl esters), being either hydrophilic,
amphiphilic or hydrophobic according to their alkyl chain
length, were dissolved in ethanol at the desired concentration.
A 1000-fold dilution was performed in culture medium to
obtain final concentrations of 0, 10, 25, 50 and 100 mm. After-
wards, 100 ml of this culture medium containing phenolic
compounds was dispensed into each well of a 96-well micro-
plate 24 h after cell seeding. The experiment involving each
concentration was repeated four times (n = 4) in four diff-
erent microplates seeded from different cell passages (each
microplate comprising already triplicate wells for each
concentration).
DNA quantification by the Hoechst
33258 method
Cell DNA content was measured using the Hoechst 33258
method previously described by De Arcangelis et al.[15] with
some modifications. Cells of each well (previously measured
for the antioxidant capacity determination) were lysed with
100 ml of TE5N buffer solution (10 mm Tris-HCl pH 8,
0.1 mm EDTA and 0.5 m NaCl) containing 0.05% Triton
X-100. The microplate was incubated for 10 min under stir-
ring at room temperature. Afterwards, 100 ml/well Hoechst
33258 solution at 0.4 mg/ml in TE5N were added, then incu-
bated for 30 min at room temperature protected from light.
The fluorescence (lex: 340/lem: 440 nm) was then read in the
same spectrofluorimeter as used in the section on Measure-
ment of Reactive Oxygen Species, above.
To calibrate the fibroblasts’ DNA content, the fluorescence
of a standard of salmon sperm DNA solutions (0, 0.5, 1, 2 and
4 mg/ml TE5N) incubated with 100 ml Hoechst 33258 solu-
tion in TE5N, was analysed on a separate microplate. It
is worth mentioning that the DNA concentration range was
prepared in the same TE5N solution as samples.
Measurement of reactive oxygen species using
2Ј,7Ј-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate probe
After 24, 48 or 72 h incubation with phenolic compounds,
the medium was removed. Adherent cells were washed
twice with 50 ml/well Locke’s buffer (140 mm NaCl, 5 mm
KCl, 1.2 mm MgCl2, 1.8 mm CaCl2, 10 mm d-glucose and
10 mm hydroxyethylpyperazinethane acid (HEPES)), then
each well was filled with 100 ml Locke’s buffer. A measure-
ment (lex: 485 nm/lem: 530 nm) of the fluorescent back-
ground was achieved with a microplate spectrofluorimeter
(Synergy 2 BioTek, Bio-tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski,
USA).
Cells were incubated with 100 ml of a 10 mm solution of
H2DCFDA prepared in Locke’s buffer, for 20 min at 37°C in
the dark. After the removal of the H2DCFDA solution, each
well was washed twice using 50 ml Locke’s buffer and finally
was filled with 100 ml Locke’s buffer. The microplate
First, all fluorescence values were subtracted from
the fluorescence of a 0 mg/ml sperm salmon DNA solution
(Equation 4).
Corrected FluoHoechst = RawHoechst
−
(4)
FluoHoechst (0 μg /ml DNA)