Arylpalladium Phosphonate Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2009 1201
(s, Ar-H), 122.8 (d, J ) 2.9, Ar-H), 118.0 (d, J ) 3.0, Ar-H), 117.5
(s, Ar-H), 57.7 (d, J ) 2.9, -OCH2CH3), 35.4 (s, -CMe3), 35.2
(s, -CMe3), 30.34 (s, -CMe3), 30.31 (s, -CMe3), 16.8 (d, J )
7.5, -OCH2CH3), -1.9 (d, J ) 5.2, -PdMe). 31P{1H} NMR
(CDCl3, 25 °C): δ 72.6.
General Procedure for Isolation of DiphosphinePd(R)(P(O)-
(OEt)2) Species. A 10 mL reaction vial was charged with the
appropriate bu2bipyPd(R)(P(O)(OEt)2) precursor and 1 equiv of the
diphosphine. After evacuating and refilling with nitrogen, anhydrous
ether (5 mL) was injected by syringe. After stirring for 3 h, the
solid was separated using a centrifuge, and the resulting solid was
washed with diethyl ether (2 × 3 mL) and dried under vacuum.
31P{1H} NMR spectroscopic data for the isolated and observed
compounds are summarized in Table 2.
0.038 mmol) and dppp (0.016 g, 0.038 mmol) to afford 0.012 g
(47%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for C32H39O3P3Pd: C, 57.28;
H, 5.86. Found: C, 56.97; H, 5.49. H NMR (CDCl3, 25 °C): δ
7.89 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.41 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 6.91-7.20 (m, 13H, Ar-
H), 4.18 (m, 4H, -OCH2CH3), 1.99 (m, 2H, -PCH2CH2C H2P-),
1.95 (m, 4H, -PCH2CH2CH2P-), 1.37 (m, 3H, PdMe), 1.09
(t, 6H, -OCH2CH3).
1
General Procedure for Observation of DiphosphinePd-
(R)(P(O)(OEt)2) Species. For compounds that underwent rapid
reductive elimination, the following method was used for spectro-
scopic characterization at reduced temperatures. An oven-dried
NMR tube was charged with bu2bipyPd(R)(P(O)(OEt)2), 1 equiv
of diphosphine, and 0.5 mL of C6D6. After shaking for 2 min the
samples were placed into a cooled NMR spectrometer (8 °C) and
1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectra were recorded.
Preparation of dppePd(4-C6H4CN)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general
procedure was followed using bu2bipyPd(4-C6H4CN)(P(O)(OEt)2)
(0.020 g, 0.033 mmol) and dppe (0.013 g, 0.033 mmol) to afford
0.018 g (75%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for C37H38NO3P3Pd:
Reductive Elimination of Arylphosphonates. Method A. An
oven-dried NMR tube was charged with isolated diphosphineP-
d(R)(P(O)(OEt)2), 1 equiv of diphosphine, (methoxymethyl)diphe-
1
C, 59.73; H, 5.15. Found: C, 60.05; H, 4.85. H NMR (C6D6, 25
1
nylphosphine oxide (internal standard), and 0.5 mL of C6D6. H
°C): δ 7.93 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.62 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.88-7.18 (m,
18H, Ar-H), 3.88 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 3.61 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3),
1.72 (m, 4H, -PCH2CH2P-), 0.80 (t, 6H, J ) 7.2, -OCH2CH3).
Preparation of dppePd(4-C6H4NO2)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general
procedure was followed using bu2bipyPd(4-C6H4NO2)(P(O)-
(OEt)2) (0.020 g, 0.032 mmol) and dppe (0.013 g, 0.032 mmol) to
afford 0.015 g (63%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for
NMR spectra were collected over three half-lives. Comparison of
the integral values of the palladium complex and arylphosphonate
relative to the internal standard provided the concentrations of the
complexes at specified times.
Method B. An oven-dried NMR tube was charged with
bu2bipyPd(R)(P(O)(OEt)2), 2 equiv of diphosphine, (methoxym-
ethyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (internal standard), and 0.5 mL of
C6D6. A 1H NMR spectrum was recorded immediately to determine
the extent of bu2bipy displacement. Once the bipyridine ligand was
1
C36H38NO5P3Pd: C, 56.59; H, 5.01. Found: C, 56.88; H, 4.22. H
NMR (C6D6, 25 °C): δ 7.92 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.61 (m, 2H, Ar-H),
6.90-7.14 (m, 18H, Ar-H), 3.65 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 3.61 (m,
2H, -OCH2CH3), 1.68 (m, 4H, -PCH2CH2P-), 0.83 (t, 6H, J )
7.2, -OCH2CH3).
Preparation of dppePd(2-C6H4Me)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general
procedure was followed using bu2bipyPd(2-C6H4Me)(P(O)(OEt)2)
(0.020 g, 0.033 mmol) and dppe (0.013 g, 0.033 mmol) to afford
0.010 g (42%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for C37H41O3P3Pd: C,
60.62; H, 5.64. Found: C, 60.69; H, 5.31. 1H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C):
δ 8.10 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 6.89-7.35 (m, 20H, Ar-H), 3.70 (m, 2H,
-OCH2CH3), 3.45 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 2.50 (s, 3H, -Me), 1.80
(m, 4H, -PCH2CH2P-), 0.89 (t, 6H, -OCH2CH3).
Preparation of dppePd(C6H5)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general pro-
cedure was followed using bu2bipyPd(C6H5)(P(O)(OEt)2) (0.020
g, 0.034 mmol) and dppe (0.014 g, 0.034 mmol) to afford 0.015 g
(61%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for C36H39O3P3Pd: C, 60.13;
H, 5.47. Found: C, 60.27; H, 5.30. 1H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C): δ 7.95
(m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.75 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 6.82-7.13 (m, 18H, Ar-H),
3.95 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 3.62 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 1.72 (m,
4H, -PCH2CH2P-), 0.81 (t, 6H, J ) 7.4, -OCH2CH3).
Preparation of dppePd(2,6-C6H3Me2)(P(O)(OEt)2). The gen-
eral procedure was followed using bu2bipyPd(2,6-C6H3Me2)(P(O)-
(OEt)2) (0.020 g, 0.032 mmol) and dppe (0.013 g, 0.032 mmol) to
afford 0.019 g (79%) as a white solid. Due to the slow rate of
ligand displacement, this reaction was stirred for 24 h before
isolation. Anal. Calcd for C38H43O3P3Pd: C, 61.09; H, 5.80. Found:
C, 61.36; H, 6.37. 1H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C): δ 8.14 (m, 4H, Ar-H),
6.82-7.24 (m, 19H, Ar-H), 3.96 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH3), 3.60 (m,
2H, -OCH2CH3), 2.67 (s, 6H, -Me), 1.82 (m, 4H, -PCH2CH2P-),
0.85 (t, 6H, -OCH2CH3).
Preparation of dppePd(Me)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general proce-
dure was followed using bu2bipyPd(Me)(P(O)(OEt)2) (0.020 g,
0.038 mmol) and dppe (0.015 g, 0.038 mmol) to afford 0.024 g
(96%) as a white solid. Anal. Calcd for C31H37O3P3Pd: C, 56.67;
H, 5.68. Found: C, 56.32; H, 5.86. 1H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C): δ 7.91
(m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.41 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 6.91-7.20 (m, 12H, Ar-H),
4.18 (m, 4H, -OCH2CH3), 1.80 (m, 4H, -PCH2CH2P-), 1.42 (m,
3H, PdMe), 1.08 (t, 6H, -OCH2CH3).
1
fully displaced (within minutes in most cases), H NMR spectra
were systematically collected over three half-lives. Comparison of
the integral values of the palladium complex and arylphosphonate
relative to the internal standard provided the concentrations of the
species.
Computational Studies. All calculations were performed with the
Jaguar 5.5 code using the B3LYP/CSDZ* level of theory. Unless
otherwise noted, stationary points have been confirmed by vibrational
analysis using an analytic Hessian. Additionally, the transition mode
for transition states has been visually inspected to correspond to the
expected mode. All unimolecular rate constants were computed using
RRKM theory at 300 K. For reactions computed in solvent, the
Poisson-Boltzmann equations were solved numerically using the
parameters for benzene. In these cases, the barrier height was adjusted
by adding the difference of the solvation corrections, retaining the same
vibrational analysis of reactant and transition state for the prefactor
computation. The diphosphine ligand is typically dppe in experimental
systems, but the phenyls have been replaced with hydrogens for the
sake of modeling simplicity.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank the National Science
Foundation for the funds to purchase the NMR spectrometer
(CHE-0521108) and acknowledge the U.S. Department of
Education for their support of CASCaM. Calculations employed
the UNT computational chemistry resource, the purchase of
which was supported by a CRIF grant from the U.S. National
Science Foundation (CHE-0342824). T.R.C. acknowledges NSF
(CHE-0701247) for supporting his contribution. The authors
thank Professor John Hartwig, Daniela Ide, and Marco Rod-
riguez-Lopez for helpful discussions.
Supporting Information Available: CIF files for the arylpal-
ladium phosphonate complexes as well as details of the computa-
tional investigation are available free of charge via the Internet at
Preparation of dpppPd(Me)(P(O)(OEt)2). The general proce-
dure was followed using bu2bipyPd(Me)(P(O)(OEt)2) (0.020 g,
OM800906M