38
G. Tocco et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 36–39
12.612 min. Scan:1795 Chan:1 Ion:1774us RIC:153851BC
162
100%
75%
50%
H3C
CH3
190
MCounts
2.5
O
O
HO
14
25%
0%
91
77
147
150
105
51
50
63
133
119
11.760 min. Scan:1657 Chan:1 Ion:1076 us RIC:392682 BC
178
175 m/z
2.0
190
75
100
125
100%
75%
OH CH3
O
O
H3C
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
161
13
50%
25%
0%
122
66
150
94
51
50
77
75
105
175
175
133
125
100
150
m/z
minutes
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Scheme 5. Gas-chromatogram and mass spectra of 4,7-dimethyl-5-hydroxycoumarin 13 and 4,5-dimethyl-7-hydroxy coumarin 14.
20. Pandya, A. G.; Guevara, I. L. Dermatol. Clin. 2000, 18, 91.
21. Diogenes, M. J. M.; de Morais, S. M.; Carvalho, F. F. Int. J. Dermatol. 1995, 34, 72.
22. Stahl, E.; Keller, K.; Blinn, C. Planta Med. 1983, 48, 5.
23. Dickerson, T. J.; Reed, N. N.; Janda, K. D. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3325.
24. Greenwald, R. B. J. Control. Release 2001, 74, 159.
25. Tocco, G.; Begala, M.; Delogu, G.; Meli, G.; Picciau, C.; Podda, G. Synlett 2005, 8,
1296. and references therein.
underwent regioselective cyclization with all the employed b-keto-
esters, just leading to 4,5-dialkyl-7-O-PEG-coumarin derivatives,
independently of the length of the alkyl chain. Conversely, when
we carried out the reaction in solution, under the classical von
Pechmann conditions, it was observed, by means of GC–MS analy-
sis, the formation of the both possible isomers 13 and 14,31 and not
of only one, as previously reported.32–34 (Scheme 5).
26. General Procedure. All PEG samples (Aldrich) were melted in vacuum at 90 °C
for about 45 min before use, to remove any trace of moisture. After reaction,
the crude mixture was concentrated in vacuum to eliminate the solvent, and
than it was added by 6–7 ml of CH2Cl2 to completely dissolve the residue.
The obtained mixture was added to Et2O (50 ml per g of polymer) cooled at
0 °C. The obtained suspension was filtered through a sintered glass filter and
the solid obtained was repeatedly washed on the filter with pure Et2O. All
the samples have been crystallized from isopropyl alcohol, to eventually
eliminate the excess of the polar reagents or the by-products. It is well
known, in fact, that PEGs, as a result of their helical structure, show a strong
propensity to crystallize.25 The yields of PEG-supported compounds were
determined by weight. The indicated yields were for pure products after
crystallization from isopropyl alcohol. Their purity was confirmed by
We can conclude that PEG-conjugates could be valid candidates
as innovative tyrosinase-active compounds, since they are photo-
stable,35 widely soluble in water and in many other solvents and,
last but not least, PEG did not show to affect the activity of an-
chored molecules.
In addition, due to PEG features,23 we think that PEG-cardol and
PEG-cardol coumarins, could lack skin irritation and some other
undesirable side effects.
300 MHz 1H NMR analysis in CDCl3 with
a pre-saturation of the
Finally, PEG confirmed again to be a fundamental tool for the
synthesis of small organic molecules.
methylene signals of the polymeric support at 3.60 ppm. In recording the
NMR spectra, a relaxation delay of 6 s and an acquisition time of 4 s were
used to ensure complete relaxation and accuracy of integration. The
integrals of the signals of the PEG CH2OCH3 fragment at d = 3.30 and 3.36,
were used as internal standards.
References and notes
27. 1-(Allyloxy)-3-O-PEG-5-pentadecylbenzene (4): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) ppm:
6.28 (s, 2H), 6.25 (s, 1H), 5.97 (m, 1H, 3J = 5.4 Hz, 3J trans = 17.3 Hz, 3J
cis = 10.5 Hz), 5.34 (d, 1H, 3J = 17.3 Hz), 5.20 (d, 1H, 3J = 10.5 Hz), 4.50 (d, 2H,
3J = 5.4 Hz), 3.36 (s, 3H), 2.45 (t, 2H, 3J = 7.5 Hz), 1.21 (m, 26H), 0.88 (t, 3H, 3J=
1. Tyman, J. H. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1979, 8, 499.
2. John, G.; Pillai, C. K. S. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 1993, 13, 255.
3. John, G.; Pillai, C. K. S. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1993, 1069, 31.
4. Attanasi, O. A.; Buratti, S.; Filippone, P. Org. Prep. Proced. Ind. 1995, 27, 645.
5. Tyman, J. H. P. In Synthetic and Natural Phenols; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1996. vol.
52.
7.0 Hz). IR (NaCl) cmÀ1
: m 3100, 2850, 1820, 1650, 1460, 1260, 1050, 820. 3-O-
PEG-5-pentadecylphenol (5): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) ppm: 6.27 (s, 1H), 6.22
(s, 2H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 2.43 (t, 2H), 1.21 (m, 26H), 0.83 (t, 3H). IR (NaCl) cmÀ1
: m
6. Kozubek, A.; Tyman, J. H. P. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1.
3550, 3120, 2830, 1610, 1470, 1270.
7. Tyman, J. H. P.; Bruce, I. E. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2003, 6, 291.
8. John, G.; Vemula, K. Soft Matter 2006, 2, 909.
28. The pre-incubation with enzyme consisted of 1.8 ml of a 1/15 M phosphoric
acid buffer solution (pH 6.8), 0.1 ml of an aqueous solution of mushroom
tyrosinase (1000 U/ml, Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.1 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) with or without a sample. The mixture was pre-incubated at 25 °C for
9. Himejima, M.; Kubo, I. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 418.
10. Kubo, I.; Muroi, H.; Kubo, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1995, 3, 873.
11. Kubo, J.; Ran Lee, J.; Kubo, I. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 533.
12. Kubo, I.; Ochi, M.; Vieira, P. C.; Komatsu, S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 1012.
13. Kubo, I.; Komatsu, S.; Ochi, M. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 970.
14. Kubo, I.; Kim, M.; Naya, K.; Komatsu, S.; Yamagiwa, Y.; Ohashi, K.; Sakamoto,
Y.; Hirakawa, S.; Kamikawa, T. Chem. Lett. 1987, 16, 1101.
15. Masamoto, Y.; Murata, Y.; Baba, K.; Shimoishi, Y.; Tada, M.; Takahata, K. Biol.
Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 422.
16. Solano, F.; Briganti, S.; Picardo, M.; Ghanem, G. Pigment Cell. Res. 2006, 19, 550.
17. Finn, G. J.; Creaven, B. S.; Egan, D. A. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 26, 16.
18. Kubo, I.; Kinst-Hori, I.; Yokokawa, Y. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 545.
19. Hartong, D. T.; Berson, E. L.; Dryja, T. P. Lancet 2006, 368, 1795.
10 min. Then, 1 ml of a 1.5 mM L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) solution
was added and the reaction was monitored at 475 nm for 5 min. The
percentage of inhibition of tyrosinase activity was calculated as inhibition
(%) = (A À B)/A Â 100, where A represents the difference in the absorbance of
control sample between an incubation time of 0.5 and 1.0 min, and
B
represents the difference in absorbance of the test sample between an
incubation time of 0.5 and 1.0 min. The activity of mushroom tyrosinase was
determined using
a Varian Cary 50 UV–vis spectrophotometer. DMSO
inhibitory activity, in the same experimental conditions, was evaluated as
10.7%.