0.5
Notes and References
† E-mail: smith.115@nd.edu
0.4
0.3
0.2
‡ Compound 1a was synthesized by treating dimethyl cyclohexane-
1,3-dicarboxylate with LDA (2 equiv). followed by Me2SO4 (2 equiv.). Sa-
ponification gave 1a in 40% overall yield. Similarly, compound 1b was
prepared by treating the di-tert-butyl cyclohexane-1,3-dicarboxylate with
LDA (2 equiv.) followed by 4-(pyren-1-yl)butyl trifluoromethylsulfonate (2
equiv.). Acid hydrolysis gave 1b in 15% overall yield.
§ The conformational assignments are based on the close homology of the
NMR data with Kemp et al. (ref. 5) and Menger et al. (ref. 6), who examined
the conformational switching of cis,cis-1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane-
1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (Kemp’s triacid). In particular, the non-equivalent
methylene protons between the two carboxy group in 1a (Ha and Hb)
resonate at d 2.63 and 1.13, respectively, in 1:1 MeOH–H2O (Dd = 1.50
ppm). The chemical shift for Ha is strongly deshielded due to the anisotropy
of the neighbouring carbonyl groups. In the case of dianion 2a, the
resonances for Ha and Hb are much closer together (Dd = 0.35 ppm)
indicating that they are nearly equidistant from the carboxylates, which can
only occur if the carboxylates have assumed equatorial positions. Structure
3 is drawn as a classical chair with the carboxylates in diaxial positions,
however, another possibility is a flattened half-chair which provides the
0.1
0
1
2
CaCl added (equiv.)
2
Fig. 3 Change in excimer/monomer ratio for 2b (3 mm in MeOH upon
titration with CaCl2. Excitation at 346 nm, monomer emission at 397 nm,
excimer emission at 470 nm, T = 298 K.
Strong evidence that the change in fluorescence is due to a
conformational change was obtained from the following control
experiments. (i) All of the fluorescence titrations were repeated
using tetrabutylammonium pyrene-1-butyrate as a replacement
fluorophore. In all cases, negligible changes in fluorescence
were observed, indicating that the excimer/monomer switching
is not due to due to intermolecular or environmental factors. (ii)
Treatment of a CD3CN solution of 1a with 2 equiv. of
tetramethylammonium hydroxide changes the difference in 1H
NMR chemical shifts for Ha and Hb Dd = 1.36 to 0.50 ppm,
which is consistent with a change from 1a to 2a.§ A subsequent
titration of this solution with ammonium thiocyanate results in
smooth migration back to Dd = 1.61 ppm, suggesting that 2a
becomes protonated and converts to 4a. The fluorescence
switching effects of ammonium and alkali metal cations are
essentially negligible in polar, competitive solvents such as
MeOH. However, moderate descreases in excimer/monomer
ratio are induced by titrating 2b with alkaline metal dichlorides
to produce 3b (Fig. 3).
In summary, a simple but sensitive allosteric system is
described that can undergo large changes in molecular
shape. Depending on the experimental conditions, the
conformational switching can be induced by divalent and
monovalent metal cations, as well as strong and weak
acids. Analogue 1b exhibits large changes in fluorescence and
is thus sensor for Lewis and Brønsted acids. Future efforts will
attempt to incorporate this conformational switch into the
structures of other molecular devices.
carboxylates
environments. (ref. 6).
with
slightly
more
spacious
psuedo-axial
1 H.-J. Schneider and A. K. Mohammad-Ali, in Comprehensive Supramo-
lecular Chemistry, ed. J. L. Atwood, J. E. D. Davies, D. D. MacNicol and
F. Vo¨gtle, Pergamon, New York, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 81–86.
2 G. L. Arnold and S. A. van Arman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 4745;
G. E. Collins and L.-S. Choi, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1135; H. Matsu-
moto and S. Shinkai, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 77; M. Takeshita and
S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett., 1994, 125; I. Aoki, T. Harada, T. Sakaki,
Y. Kawahara and S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992,
1341.
3 G. K. Walkup and B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3053;
H. Ikeda, M. Nakamura, N. Ise, N. Oguma, A. Nakamura, T. Ikeda,
F. Toda and A. Ueno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 10 980.
4 Other switchable cyclohexane-based systems include the following:
V. V. Samoshin, V. A. Chertkov, L. P. Vatlina, E. K. Dobretsova,
N. A. Simonov, L. P. Kastorsky, D. E. Gremyachinsky and
H.-J. Schneider, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 3981; M. Goodall,
P. M. Kelly, D. Parker, K. Gloe and H. Stephan, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1997, 59; S. M. Shirdkar and G. R. Weisman, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1989, 236.
5 D. S. Kemp and K. S. Petrakis, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 5140.
6 F. M. Menger, P. A. Chicklo and M. J. Sherrod, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989,
30, 6943.
7 K. Izutsu, Dissociation Constants in Dipolar Aprotic Solvents, Blackwell
Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1990.
8 I. M. Kolthoff, M. K. Chantooni and S. Bhowmik, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1968, 90, 23.
9 I. M. Kolthoff and M. K. Chantooni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97,
1376.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
(USA).
Received in Columbia, MO, USA, 28th July 1997; 7/05445I
432
Chem. Commun., 1998