Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
An important feature of this new cross-coupling hinges on
the simplicity of its setup and the development of a new one-
pot protocol. Hence, the transformation could be conducted
without the need for isolation of the activated esters, as
exemplified by 10 representative substrates in Scheme 1 (3–5,
8, 21–25, 29). A simple activation of the carboxylic acid by
DCC, followed by the Suzuki protocol, afforded comparable
yields as starting from the isolated redox-active ester. This
rapid access coupled with the experimental ease of the union
might have a tangible impact on the speed with which many
organic compounds can be made. For example, the prepara-
tion of p-bromophenyl substituted species such as 5 has
previously required as many as five steps to procure.[11] Most
routes to compounds such as 3–10 involve organometallic
additions to ketones followed by cationic or radical-based
reductions.[12] The simple ester 12 has previously required
more than five steps to prepare.[13] The unnatural amino acids
15 and 16 have required multistep pathways involving
homologation of aspartic acid rather than a direct coupling
with glutamic acid as in the present work.[14] A direct
comparison to reported substrates for Ni-catalyzed protocols
using alkyl bromides and arylboronic species resulted similar
yields of the cross-coupling product when the redox-active
ester is utilized (39–40).[8a, b] Albeit the apparent similarities of
both protocols, we hypothesized that a different mechanism
could be operating under our optimized conditions. To test
the hypothesis, an alkyl bromide was embedded in a pending
chain of a linear redox-active ester and subjected to the
optimized conditions. Interestingly, complete chemoselectiv-
ity favoring coupling of the redox-active ester was obtained
for substrate 41, which highlights the orthogonal compatibil-
ity with other protocols in the area of Suzuki arylations. It is
worth mentioning that the catalyst loading was standardized
to 20 mol% across the examples in Scheme 1 for optimal
yields. However, we demonstrated that comparable yields
could also be obtained when the catalyst loading was lowered
to 10% (4, 21–23, 29).
Scheme 2. A) Reaction carried out with wet solvents and opened to air.
B) Reaction performed at gram-scale. C) Ring-opening of a cyclopropyl-
methylene redox-active ester. D) Working hypothesis for the redox-
active ester cross-coupling with aryl- and vinylboronic acids.
The experimental ease of this transformation cannot be
overemphasized as the demanding environment of medicinal
chemistry prioritizes those reactions that require minimal
experimental precaution. Thus, as depicted in Scheme 2A,
a reaction of 1 was conducted using wet solvents without any
precaution to exclude air or moisture (open-flask) to produce
adduct 3 in 65% isolated yield. The scalability was also
evaluated using 42 and it was found to proceed smoothly to
deliver 3 on a gram-scale (Scheme 2B). In accord with our
previous findings,[3,4] the reaction of redox-active esters with
in situ generated low valent Ni species generates radical
intermediates as evidenced by the cyclopropane-opened
product 44 derived from 43 (Scheme 2C).
A postulated mechanism for this transformation is
depicted in Scheme 2D. By analogy to prior mechanistic
investigations of Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with
alkyl halides,[7] and our previous studies using organozinc
reagents,[3,4] a related pathway is postulated for the coupling
of redox-active esters with boronic acids. Initially, a NiI
complex I undergoes transmetalation with an arylboronic
acid aided by Et3N and H2O delivering aryl-NiI complex II.[15]
Reduction of the redox-ester by complex II affords species III
which, upon fragmentation, ultimately leads to the alkyl
radical and the parent phthalimide anion.[3–5] Subsequent
recombination[7,16] with complex IV delivers intermediate
complex V which, after reductive elimination, affords the
desired product and regenerates the catalytically active
species I.
Although it is perhaps too early to cite specific limitations
of this transformation, currently ortho-methoxy groups on the
boronic acid lead to diminished yield. Acids for which the
activated ester is hydrolytically labile leads to lower yields
due to competing hydrolysis.[9] Aryl boronic acids that have
difficulty in transmetallation, such as 4-pyrimidyl, are also
low-yielding. It is possible that optimization of the ligands and
redox-active ester might improve the yield of such substrates.
Our lab is currently involved in the study of such drawbacks as
well as the investigation of the mechanism, in particular the
origin of the chemoselectivity with alkyl halides.
A surprisingly simple union of the two most popular
building blocks in modern organic chemistry has been
enabled through the exclusive use of a redox-active ester
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!