Department of Guangxi Province (2006) for financial support,
and thank the Analytical and Testing Centre at Huazhong
University of Science and Technology for measurements.
Notes and references
1 (a) R. J. Fitzmaurice, G. M. Kyne, D. Douheret and
J. D. Kilburn, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 841–864;
(b) T. H. Webb and C. S. Wilcox, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1993, 383–395;
(c) P. Shahgaldian and U. Pieles, Sensors, 2006, 6, 593–615.
2 M. Movassaghi and E. N. Jacobesen, Science, 2002, 298,
1904–1905.
Fig. 3 TEM image of gel formed by interaction of 4 (10 mM) and
(1S,2S)-8 (20 mM) in a mixed solvent of cyclohexane and 1,2-
dichloroethane (20 : 1). The right hand picture is a magnified TEM
image of the part circled by a white line in the left hand one.
3 Y. Kubo, S. Maeda, T. Sumio and M. Kubo, Nature, 1996, 382,
522–524.
4 (a) Y. Kobayashi, F. Morisawa and S. Kazuhiko, J. Org. Chem.,
2006, 71, 606–615; (b) B. Jacques, M. Chavarot, F. Rose-Munch
and E. Rose, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3481–3484;
(c) K. Sakai, R. Sakurai and H. Nohira, Top. Curr. Chem.,
2007, 269, 199–231.
5 (a) S. Hanessian, M. Simard and S. Roelens, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 7630–7645; (b) U. Rychlewska, J. Mol. Struct., 1999,
474, 235–243; (c) J. Liao, X. Peng, J. Zhang, K. Yu, X. Cui, J. Zhu
and J. Deng, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 1080–1085.
6 (a) A. Brizard, R. Oda and I. Huc, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 256,
167–218; (b) A. Brizard, C. Aime, T. Labrot, I. Huc, D. Berthier,
F. Artzner and B. Desbat, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
3754–3762; (c) T. Yamamoto, T. Fukushima, A. Kosaka,
W. Jin, Y. Yamamoto, N. Ishii and T. Aida, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 1672–1675; (d) M. M. J. Smulders, A. P. H. J.
Schenning and E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
606–611.
and 500 nm, respectively, in accordance with the results obtained
by FE-SEM, and the resultant spheres were solid instead of
hollow (Fig. S10 and S11w). Very interestingly, the gel occasion-
ally formed from a mixture of 4 with (1S,2S)-8 showed the
coexistence of both nanofibers and spheroids (Fig. 3, S12 and
S13w). The nanofibers had a length of about 1 mm and a width
of about 20 nm, and the diameter of the spheroids was about
20 nm which was almost the same as the width of the nanofibers.
Moreover, each spheroid was made of smaller particles having a
diameter of about 3 to 4 nm and the particles counted 10 to 30
aggregated at random to form a spheroid (Fig. 3). These
spheroids may further aggregate at random to form bigger
spheres. The XRD pattern of powder solid dried from a mixture
of 4 and (1S,2S)-8 in cyclohexane and 1,2-dichloroethane (20 : 1)
exhibited no sharp peaks at low angles (Fig. S5w). This result
confirmed that the spheroidal aggregate was isotropic.
7 (a) J. Zhang, M. T. Albelda, Y. Liu and J. W. Canary, Chirality,
2005, 17, 404–420; (b) T. J. Meurig and R. Robert, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2008, 41, 708–720.
8 (a) G. A. Hembury, V. V. Borovkov and Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev.,
2008, 108, 1–73; (b) A. Rang, M. Engeser, N. M. Maier,
M. Nieger, W. Lindner and C. A. Schalley, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008,
14, 3855–3859; (c) A. Lohr and F. Wuerthner, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 2227–2229; (d) M. M. J. Smulders, A. P. H. Schenning and
E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 606–611.
9 (a) A. R. Hirst and D. K. Smith, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11,
5496–5508; (b) M. A. B. Block, C. Kaiser, A. Khan and
S. Hecht, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 245, 89–150; (c) X. Y. Gao
and H. Matsui, Adv. Mater., 2005, 17, 2037–2050; (d) T. Shimizu,
M. Masuda and H. Minamikawa, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105,
1401–1443.
10 (a) M. de Loos, J. V. Esch, R. M. Kellogg and B. L. Feringa,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 613–616; (b) A. R. Hirst,
D. K. Smith, M. C. Feiters and H. P. M. Geurts, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2004, 10, 5901–5910; (c) Y. Zhang, Z. Yang, F. Yuan, H. Gu,
P. Gao and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 15028–15029;
(d) Y. Zhang, H. Gu, Z. Yang and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 13680–13681.
One probable mechanism for the formation of nanospheres
is shown in Fig. 4. The smallest particle 10 which could be
discerned in TEM images probably came from the arrange-
ment of several complexes 9 side by side.11 Calculated by
Chem3D or Rasmol, the length of complex 9 is 3.82 nm so that
it can form particle 10 with a diameter of about 3 to 4 nm. By
the attracting force between particles 10, they aggregated at
random into a bigger sphere.
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (No. 20872040), Scientific Research Projects of Education
11 Y.-S. Zheng, A. Ji, X.-J. Chen and J. L. Zhou, Chem. Commun.,
2007, 3398–3400.
12 (a) H. Brunner, M. Muschiol and M. Zabel, Synthesis, 2008,
405–408; (b) M. Leeman, G. Brasile, E. Gelens, T. Vries,
B. Kaptein and R. Kellogg, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
1287–1290; (c) A. Ryoda, N. Yajima, T. Haga, T. Kumamoto,
W. Nakanishi, M. Kawahata, K. Yamaguchi and T. Ishikawa,
J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 133–141; (d) I. Kmecz, B. Simandi,
E. Szekely, J. Lovasz and E. Fogassy, Chirality, 2007, 19,
430–433; (e) H.-J. Schneider and K. Kato, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2007, 46, 2694–2696.
13 (a) H.-S. Yuan and Z.-T. Huang, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1999,
10, 429–437; (b) A. Karakucuk, M. Durmaz, A. Sirit, M. Yilmaz
and A. S. Demir, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 1963–1968.
14 (a) E. A. Alekseeva, V. A. Bacherikov, A. I. Gren, A. V. Mazepa,
V. Y. Gorbatyuk and S. P. Krasnoshchekaya, Russ. J. Org. Chem.,
2000, 36, 1321–1325; (b) E. Quinlan, S. E. Matthews and
T. Gunnlaugssona, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 9333–9338.
15 (a) C. Jaime, J. de Mendoza, P. M. Prados and C. Sa
Chem., 1991, 56, 3372–3376; (b) C. Jaime, J. de Mendoza,
P. M. Prados and C. Sanchez, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 4518–4520.
´
nchez, J. Org.
Fig. 4 Schematic illustration of the formation of nanospheres.
´
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 1121–1123 | 1123