Sung and Wang
observed.3j,4,5 Structures of the substituted allyl â-ke-
toesters 1 are similar to that of allyl malonate 2a , so the
oxidative free-radical cyclization of 1 may give the 5-exo
cyclization products only, which makes system 1 a good
model for studying the stereoselectivity of the cyclization.
In this study, we investigated the mechanisms and
stereoselectivity of the free-radical cyclizations of sub-
stituted allyl R-methyl-â-ketoester radicals, which were
prepared from oxidation of 1 with Mn(OAc)3, by means
of syntheses and DFT calculations. Hopefully, the results
in this study help chemists to control the stereoselectivity
of the free-radical cyclization of this type of compound.
Com p u ta tion a l Deta ils
All calculations reported here were performed with
Gaussian98 program.6 Geometry optimizations of 11, cis-
12(TS), cis-13, cis-6, trans-12(TS), trans-13, trans-6, 14,
cis-15(TS), cis-16, cis-7, trans-15(TS), trans-16, trans-
7, 17, 18, cis-19(TS), cis-20, cis-9, trans-19(TS), trans-
20, trans-9, cis-22a , cis-22b, trans-22a , and trans-22b
were carried out at the UB3LYP/6-31G*7 level for radicals
and the B3LYP/6-31G*7 level for nonradicals without any
symmetry restriction except for cis-22a and cis-22b,
whose dihedral angle between propionyl CdO and the
five-membered ring is fixed at -15.8° in order to avoid
the attack of the carbonyl oxygen on the carbon cation.
The optimized structures of cis-22a , cis-22b, trans-22a ,
and trans-22b are shown in Figure 1, and the others are
shown in Figures 2-4 in Supporting Information. After
all the geometry optimizations were performed, analytical
F IGURE 1. Optimized structures of cis-22a , cis-22b, trans-
22a , and trans-22b at the B3LYP/6-31G* level.
vibration frequencies were calculated at the same level
to determine the nature of the located stationary points.
Thus, all the stationary points found were properly
characterized by evaluation of the harmonic frequencies.
The energies of all the stationary points were calculated
at the same level with scaled zero-point vibration ener-
gies included. The scaled factor of 0.9804 for the zero-
point vibration energies is used according to the
literature.7a Many possible conformations have been
optimized for each of the above configurations, and the
conformation with the lowest energy was chosen for each
configuration. Spin contamination from higher spin
states is significant for both HF and MP2 methods, but
it is much less for both UB3LYP and QCISD methods.7a,b
Therefore, the reliability of the calculations on the
radicals at the UB3LYP/6-31G* level in this study should
be good.7a,b
(3) (a) Corey, E. J .; Kang, M.-C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5384.
(b) Snider, B. B.; Mohan, R. M.; Kates, S. A. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
3659. (c) Ernst, A. B.; Fristad, W. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3761.
(d) Peterson, J . R.; Egler, R. S.; Horsley, D. B.; Winter, T. J .
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6109. (e) Curran, D. P.; Morgan, T. M.;
Schwartz, C. E.; Snider, B. B.; Dombroski, M. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 6607. (f) Snider, B. B.; McCarthy, B. A. J . Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 6217. (g) Snider, B. B.; Kiselgof, J . Y. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 10641.
(h) Garcia Ruano, J . L.; Rumbero, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999,
10, 4427. (i) Garzino, F.; Meou, A.; Brun, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 9803. (j) Oumar-Moustrou, H.; Moustrou, C.; Surzur, J .-M.;
Bertrand, M. P. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5684. (k) Snider, B. B.;
Patricia, J . J .; Kates, S. A. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2137.
Resu lts
(4) (a) Snider, B. B. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 339. (b) Melikyan, G. G.
Org. React. 1997, 49, 427.
DF T Ca lcu la tion s. It is known that the reactions of
the R-alkyl-â-ketoesters with Mn(OAc)3 generate the
R-alkyl-â-ketoester radicals with loss of Mn(II),3e,k so we
monitored the free-radical cyclization reactions of the
substituted allyl R-methyl-â-ketoester radicals by start-
ing from the generated radicals 11, 14, and 18. There
are two possible routes through which each of the
generated radicals could undergo the cyclization reac-
tions; one forms a cis product through the cyclization,
and the other produces a trans product. All of them are
monitored by the density functional theory at the
UB3LYP/6-31G* level for radicals and the B3LYP/6-31G*
level for nonradicals, and the results are shown in Table
1. Regarding the R-methyl-â-ketoester radical 11, activa-
tion energy to form cis-13 is 2.22 kcal/mol smaller than
that forming trans-13, and cis-13 is 0.08 kcal/mol more
stable than trans-13 (Scheme 1). After hydrogen abstrac-
tion, trans-6 is 0.62 kcal/mol more stable than cis-6. As
far as the R-methyl-â-ketoester radical 14 is concerned,
the activation energy to form cis-16 is 2.86 kcal/mol
smaller than that forming trans-16, while trans-16 is 1.97
kcal/mol more stable than cis-16 (Scheme 2). After
(5) (a) Kates, S. A.; Dombroski, M. A.; Snider, B. B. J . Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 2427. (b) Surzur, J . M.; Bertrand, M. P. Pure Appl. Chem.
1988, 60, 1659. (c) Oumar-Mahamat, H.; Moustrou, C.; Surzur, J .-M.;
Bertrand, M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 331. (d) Snider, B. B.;
McCarthy, B. A. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 9447. (e) Bertrand, M. P.;
Surzur, J . M.; Oumar-Mahamat, H.; Moustrou, C. J . Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 3089.
(6) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A.,
J r.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.;
Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo,
C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .; Ortiz, J . V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J .; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B. G.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.;
Pople, J . A. Gaussian 98, revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA,
1998.
(7) (a) Foresman, J . B.; Frisch, A. Exploring Chemistry with
Electronic Structure Methods, 2nd ed.; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA,
1996. (b) Bernardi, F.; Bottoni, A. J . Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 1912.
(c) Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and
Molecules; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1989. (d) Perdew, J . P.;
Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244. (e) Becke, A. D. J . Chem. Phys.
1993, 98, 1372. (f) Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
2772 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 7, 2003