G. Tresadern et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 175–179
179
6. Fell, M. J.; Svensson, K. A.; Johnson, B. G.; Schoepp, D. D. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
2008, 326, 209.
ring was fixed as it had delivered improved pEC50 activity and met-
abolic stability. In general a diverse range of substituents were well
tolerated in the aromatic ring (chloro-, alkyl-, amino-, aryloxy-
groups) and a good level of activity was retained. As observed in
the case of the aminoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridines 16 the 2,2,2-trifluo-
roethyl substituent led to improved metabolic stability in both
HLM and RLM (18a and 18c,d). These compounds were more active
than the examples in Table 1 and in all cases more active than the
pyridone compound 8. Increase in the EMAX glutamate response
was also good.
As mentionedearlier, oneadvantage of allosteric modulationis to
facilitate the identification of selective compounds. To examine the
selectivity of this new series, examples from both the aminoimi-
dazo[1,2-a]pyridines 16 and arylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridines 18 were
profiled in a panel of mGluR assays.22 Examples such as 16f, 16h
and 18d showed no activity in either agonism or antagonism assays
of mGluR1, mGluR3, mGluR4, mGluR5, mGluR6, mGluR7 or mGluR8
7. Jeffrey Conn, P.; Christopoulos, A.; Lindsley, C. W. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2009, 8, 41.
8. Compound 3: (a) Barda, D. A.; Wang, Z. Q.; Britton, T. C.; Henry, S. S.; Jagdmann,
G. E.; Coleman, D. S.; Johnson, M. P.; Andis, S. L.; Schoepp, D. D. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3099; compound 4: (b) Pinkerton, A. B.; Cube, R. V.;
Hutchinson, J. H.; Rowe, B. A.; Schaffhauser, H.; Zhao, X.; Daggett, L. P.; Vernier,
J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5329; compound 5: (c) Pinkerton, A. B.;
Cube, R. V.; Hutchinson, J. H.; James, J. K.; Gardner, M. F.; Rowe, B. A.;
Schaffhauser, H.; Rodriguez, D. E.; Campbell, U. C.; Daggett, L. P.; Vernier, J. M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1565; (d) compound 6: Empfield, J.; Folmer, J.
WO2007/095024 A1; (e) compound 7: Balestra, M.; Bunting, H; Chen, D.; Egle,
I.; Forst, J.; Frey, J.; Isaac, M.; Ma, F.; Nugiel, D.; Slassi, A.; Steelman, G.; Sun, G.;
Sundar, B.; Ukkiramapandian, R.; Urbanek, R.; Walsh, S. WO2006/071730 A1;
(f) compound 8: Cid-Nuñez, J. M.; Andrés-Gil, J.; Trabanco-Suárez, A. A.,
Oyarzábal-Santamarina, J.; Dautzenberg, F.; Macdonald, G.; Pullan, S.; Lutjens,
R.; Duvey, G.; Nhem, V.; Finn, T.; Melikyan, G. WO2007/104783 A1; compound
9: (g) Zhang, L.; Rogers, B. N.; Duplantier, A. J.; McHardy, S. F.; Efremov, I.;
Berke, H.; Qian, W.; Zhang, A. Q.; Maklad, N.; Candler, J.; Doran, A. C.; Lazzaro,
J.; Ganong, A. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5493; compound 10: (h)
Duplantier, A. J.; Efremov, I.; Candler, J.; Doran, A. C.; Ganong, A. H.; Haas, J. A.;
Hanks, A. N.; Kraus, K. G.; Lazzaro, J.; Lu, J.; Maklad, N.; McCarthy, S. A.;
O’Sullivan, T. J.; Rogers, B. N.; Siuciak, J. A.; Spracklin, D. K.; Zhang, L. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2524.
at 10 lM.
In summary, a series of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines with mGluR2
PAM activity have been presented. The scaffold was identified via
shape and electrostatic similarity to a known pyridone family pre-
viously reported by our team.8f Such approaches can be of value for
providing new chemical series in medicinal chemistry programs.
Incorporating side chains from our other pyridone series led to
the rapid identification of hits. The reported compounds show
comparable in vitro activity to reference compounds and examples
displayed favorable metabolic stability. Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines
represent a promising avenue for current exploration.
9. Recasens, M.; Guiramand, J.; Aimar, R.; Abdulkarim, A.; Barbanel, G. Curr. Drug
Targets 2007, 8, 651.
10. Gjoni, T.; Urwyler, S. Neuropharmacology 2008, 55, 1293.
11. Lorrain, D. S.; Schaffhauser, H.; Campbell, U. C.; Baccei, C. S.; Correa, L. D.; Rowe,
B.; Rodriguez, D. E.; Anderson, J. J.; Varney, M. A.; Pinkerton, A. B.; Vernier, J. M.;
Bristow, L. J. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 28, 1622.
12. Galici, R.; Jones, C. K.; Hemstapat, K.; Nong, Y.; Echemendia, N. G.; Williams, L.
C.; de Paulis, T.; Conn, P. J. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 173.
13. Chemical Computing Group Inc. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE),
1010 Sherbrooke St. W, Suite 910, Montreal, QC, Canada; available from
14. mGluR2 PAM binding data generated in house via displacement of a tritiated
compound from our internal pyridone series (structure not disclosed) provides
support that some examples share a common binding site. Example 5 had a
pIC50 of 6.8 and another member of the isoindolone series displayed pIC50 of
6.6.
Acknowledgements
15. Oyarzábal, J.; Howe, T.; Alcazar, J.; Andrés, J. I.; Alvarez, R. M.; Dautzenberg, F.;
Iturrino, L.; Martínez, S.; Van der Linden, I. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 2076.
17. Grant, J. A.; Gallardo, M. A.; Pickup, B. T. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 1653.
18. Nicholls, A.; MacCuish, N. E.; MacCuish, J. D. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2004, 18,
451.
The authors thank collaborators from Addex pharmaceuticals;
members of the purification and analysis group; and the in vitro
metabolism team from the discovery ADME/Tox group.
19. Trabanco-Suárez A. A.; Tresadern G. J.; Vera-Ramiro J. A.; Cid-Nuñez J. M.
WO2009/062676 A2.
References and notes
20. The effect of these compounds on the [35S]-GTP
cS binding induced by 4 lM
1. Cartmell, J.; Schoepp, D. D. J. Neurochem. 2000, 75, 889.
2. Swanson, C. J.; Bures, M.; Johnson, M. P.; Linden, A. M.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D.
D. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2005, 4, 131.
3. Schoepp, D. D.; Marek, G. J. Curr. Drug Targets: CNS Neurol. Disord. 2002, 1, 215.
4. Levine, L.; Gaydos, B.; Sheehan, D.; Goddard, A.; Feighner, J.; Potter, W.;
Schoepp, D. D. Neuropharmacology 2002, 43, 294.
5. Patil, S. T.; Zhang, L.; Martenyi, F.; Lowe, S. L.; Jackson, K. A.; Andreev, B. V.;
Avedisova, A. S.; Bardenstein, L. M.; Gurovich, I. Y.; Morozova, M. A.; Mosolov, S.
N.; Neznanov, N. G.; Reznik, A. M.; Smulevich, A. B.; Tochilov, V. A.; Johnson, B.
G.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D. D. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1102.
glutamate (ꢀEC20) was characterized using a CHO cell line expressing the
human mGluR2 receptor. See Ref. 19 for a detailed description of this assay.
21. The calculated Alog P for 16c–f were 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 and 1.6, respectively, and 1.8,
2.2 and 2.2 for 16g–i.
22. Compounds were tested for agonist or antagonist activity on mGlu receptors in
fluorescent Ca2+ assays using HEK293 cells expressing human mGluR1,
mGluR5, mGluR3, mGluR7 or mGluR8. Effects on the human mGluR4 and rat
mGluR6, expressed in L929 or CHO cells, were assessed in
functional assays.
[ cS
35S]-GTP