Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Selected optimization studies.
aldehyde substrates were reported by MacMillan and co-
workers using hypervalent iodonium salts. However, to the
best of our knowledge, direct catalytic ketone a-arylation by
transition metal/enamine catalysis has not been reported to
date (Scheme 1c).
To address the challenge of the a-arylation of cyclo-
pentanones, a palladium/enamine cooperative catalysis strat-
egy was conceived (Figure 2). Starting with a secondary amine
and a palladium(0) catalyst, an enamine and a X-PdII-aryl
species can be formed, respectively, with cyclopentanone and
Entry
Variation on the reaction conditions given above
Yield [%][a]
1
2
3
none
no pyrrolidine
no Pd(OAc)2
75
0
0
À
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
no P(o-tol)3
9
the aryl halide (steps A and B). Subsequently, C H metal-
PPh3 instead of P(o-tol)3
P(1-naphthyl)3 instead of P(o-tol)3
P(tBu)3 instead of P(o-tol)3
P(iPr)3 instead of P(o-tol)3
[Pd0{P(o-tol)3}2] instead of Pd(OAc)2/P(o-tol)3
no amine 4
48
58
73
0
77
59
54
27
57
52
67
ation of the enamine would afford an enaminyl aryl–
palladium(II) intermediate (steps C and D),[15] which can
undergo reductive elimination and hydrolysis to provide the
arylated ketone and regenerate the catalysts (step E). This
strategy avoids the use of strong bases (or acids), thus self-
aldol reactions should be less favorable. In addition, over
arylation can be minimized because enamine formation is
highly sensitive to the sterics of the ketone substrate.
Furthermore, because of the redox-neutral and mild pH
conditions, high chemoselectivity and broad functional-group
tolerance are expected.
NEt3 instead of 4
no NaOAc
NaHCO3 instead of NaOAc
Na2CO3 instead of NaOAc
4 (1 equiv)/PivOH (1 equiv)
instead of 4 (30 mol%)/NaOAc (1 equiv)
808C, 26 h[b]
608C, 48 h, with P(tBu)3
with 5 mol% Pd(OAc)2/10 mol% P(o-tol)3
with 2.5 mol% Pd(OAc)2/5 mol% P(o-tol)3
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
75
60
79
82
85 (80)
80
74
[b]
[b]
with 2.5 mol% Pd(OAc)2/5 mol% P(o-tol)3
PhBr (1 equiv)[c]
H2O (1 equiv) was added[c]
under air[c]
50
[a] Determined by GC analysis using dodecane as the internal standard.
[b] 30 mol% pyrrolidine was used. [c] Change was made based on
entry 20.
and both pyrrolidine[22] and Pd(OAc)2 were found to be
pivotal (entries 2 and 3). Among various ligands, P(o-tol)3
proved to be excellent, although P(tBu)3 worked almost
equally as well (entries 4–8). The amine 4 was found to be an
important additive, although its role remains to be defined
(entries 10 and 11).[13b] One equivalent of a weak base is
required to neutralize the HBr generated from the reaction
(see step F in Figure 2). While NaOAc proved to be optimal,
other weak bases, such as NaHCO3, were also effective
(Table 1, entries 12–14). Note that near-neutral conditions
can be adopted when NaOAc is replaced with a 1:1 4/PivOH
buffer (entry 15). Lower temperatures are also possible but
longer reaction times are required (entries 16 and 17). In
addition, 1 equivalent of PhBr can be used without significant
loss of yield (entry 20). Finally, high compatibility with water
(entry 22) and moderate tolerance of air (entry 23) were
observed.
The substrate scope was subsequently examined (Table 2).
Various aryl bromides having different electronic properties
were efficiently coupled in good to excellent yields. Substi-
tutions at the ortho-, meta-, or para-positions were all
tolerated. Functional groups (FGs), such as aryl chlorides
(3j), fluorides (3n), esters (3g and 3h), nitriles (3o), amides
(3i, 3q and 3u), thioethers (3d), and even a tocopherol
moiety (3y), were compatible. Substrates bearing enolizable
protons, such as methyl sulfones (3r), or FGs which are
Figure 2. Proposed strategy.
Nevertheless, the challenges of the proposed strategy are
twofold: 1) In palladium catalysis, amines are known to either
reduce aryl halides to arenes[16] or cross-couple to form
anilines,[17] thus, the compatibility between the two catalytic
processes would be one concern. 2) The kinetics of forming
the enamine and X-PdII-aryl species need to match each
other. Otherwise, known side reactions, such as enamine-
aldol,[18] ketone dehydrogenation,[19] and aryl dimerization[20]
can compete. Hence, to test the feasibility of this strategy,
cyclopentanone and PhBr were employed as model sub-
strates. After investigating various reaction parameters, using
pyrrolidine as the amine catalyst and Pd(OAc)2/P(o-tol)3
provided the desired monoarylation product in 75% yield
(Table 1).[21] Interestingly, lowering the palladium loading
(down to 2.5 mol%) increased the yield up to 85%
(entries 18–20). Control experiments were then conducted,
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2559 –2563