30
N. Dixit et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 73 (2009) 29–34
Scheme 1.
DMSO, Me4Si); 10.9 (2H, s, –OH); 9.6b,w(N–H from ammonium ion);
9.2 (2H, s, –N CH); 10.0 (2H, bpy); 8.7 (8H, m, Ar + bpy); 8.1 (11H,
m, Ar + bpy); 7.2 (7H, m, Ar); 6.5 (2H, m, Ar); 4.2 (2H, CH2); 3.0
(4H, –CH2–). 13C NMR: ıC (300 MHz, DMSO, Me4Si); 189.59, 187.50
(–C O); 168.37, 167.43 (CH N); 158.71, 158.40 (C–OH); 157.48,
157.26 153.25 (bpy); 152.88 (–CH–C*); 149.74, 149.51, 137.36, 137.12,
136.46 (bpy); 135.5 (N–C); 135.02 (COOH–C*); 135.0 (N–C *CH);
133.52 (COOH–C *CH); 131.88, 127.46, 126.25, 125.74, 125.27,
123.56, 123.276 and 119.559 (Ar); 113.757 (*C CH); 110.897 ( CH);
34.225 (–CH2–). b = broad, w = weak and * for C atom assigned; mass
(m/z)+413 [Ru(bpy)2]2+, 534 [L], 947 [Ru(bpy)2L]. Elemental analy-
sis (%): Calculated for [Ru(bpy)2L]·2NH4PF6, C 49.0, H 3.9 and N
8.8; Found C 48.9, H 3.7 and N 8.4. UV absorptions: ꢁmax (ace-
tonitrile)/nm (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1) 298 (38,500), 323 (11,200), 489
(9600), conductance: ꢂM (DMSO, 10−3 M) 133 (ꢃ−1 cm2 mole−1).
Emission: ꢁmax (acetonitrile)/nm (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1) 600.08 nm
(9.3 a.u.).
locked Ti-Sapphire laser with doubled tunable output was used for
exciting the samples at 456 nm. Isothermal titration calorimetry
(ITC) measurement was carried out using MicroCal VP-ITC titration
micro-calorimeter at 25 ◦C.
2.2. Preparation of bis-[methylsalicylidine-4ꢀbenzoic
acid]-ethylene (LH2)
Bis-[methyl salicyaldehyde]-ethylene (0.536 g, 1 mmol) was dis-
solved in methanol and added drop-wise to a methanolic solution
of p-aminobenzoic acid (0.272 g, 2 mmol) with stirring. Stirring was
continued for 2 h, resulting in formation of a yellow precipitate.
This precipitate was filtered off and washed several times with
methanol followed by washing with ether and dried in vacuo. Yield:
90%, M.P. > 250 ◦C, IR absorptions: ꢀmax/cm−1 3076 (C CH); 2934
(–CH2); 1680 (> O); 1599 (CH N); 1192 (–OH); 1577 and 1452
(C C, Ar). 1H NMR: ıH (300 MHz, DMSO, Me4Si); 13.37 (2H, s, –OH);
11.11 (2H, s, –COOH); 9.01 (2H, s, –N CH); 8.01 (4H, m, Ar); 7.52
and 7.35 (8H, m, Ar); 6.97 (2H, m, Ar); 4.72 (2H, s, CH2); 2.5 (4H,
s, –CH2–). 13C NMR: ıC (300 MHz, DMSO, Me4Si) 166.833 (–COO);
165.77 (CH N); 158.77 (C–OH); 151.43 (–CH–*C); 134.52 (N–C);
131.65 (COOH–*C); 131.20 (N–C *CH), 128.92 (COOH–C *CH);
121.54, 118.85 and 118.51 (Ar); 112.55 (*C CH); 112.33 ( CH);
34.97 (–CH2–) *assigned C atom, mass (m/z)+ 535 (molecular ion
peak), elemental analysis (%): calculated for C32H26N2O6, C 71.9,
H 4.8 and N 5.2; Found C 69.5, H 4.9 and N 4.7:UV absorptions:
ꢁmax(DMSO)/nm (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1) 280 (27,750), 298 (29,580),
403 (17,780).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of ligand and complex
Complex 1 is found thermally stable and soluble in DMSO. Its
composition has been assigned on the basis of its elemental anal-
ysis and spectral data. The repeated purification then elemental
analyses measurements showed that complex contains two moles
of NH4PF6. It also emphasizes that ligand is getting de-protonated
during its complexation with metal ion. Though the possibility of
isomeric complexes does exist but their separation could not be
made at this stage of the study even using repeated column chro-
matography of the Complex 1.
2.3. Preparation of RuII Complex 1
LH2 (0.536 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in DMF and triethylamine-
(∼2 mmol) was added to it with stirring followed by drop-wise
addition of a solution of Ru(bpy)2Cl2·2H2O (0.520 g, 1 mmol) in
DMF. The reaction mixture was then refluxed on a sand bath for 26 h
refrigerator for 24 h. A dark colored solid appeared, which was then
filtered and washed several times with water and dried in vacuo.
The complex was further purified on alumina column using acetoni-
trile as eluent (Scheme 1). Yield: 40%, M. P. > 250 ◦C, IR absorptions:
ꢀmax/cm−1 3444b (–OH + N–H from NH4+); 2925 (–CH2); 1602
(CH N); 840.32 (PF6−); 762 (pyridyl). 1H NMR: ıH (300 MHz,
IR spectrum of the free ligand shows major peaks at 1687 and
1599 cm−1 assigned to ꢀ COOH and ꢀCH vibrations respectively.
N
These peaks shift to 1711 and 1602 cm−1 upon complexation. The
significant change observed in case of carboxylate group vibra-
tion supports its coordination with the metal ion. Another peak
observed at 841 cm−1 is assigned to ꢀ PF6 vibrations.
−
The above observations have further been supported by 1H and
13C NMR spectra of the metal complex as compared to correspond-
ing NMR spectra of free ligand. The peak observed at ı 13.3 ppm in
the spectrum of free ligand is assigned to OH protons and is con-
sidered intramolecularly H– bonded with imine N in view of earlier
report [16]. This peak shifts at ı 10.9 ppm in the spectrum of the