V. Hadi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 2370–2373
2371
Table 1
Table 2, tert-butyl and ethyl acrylates were converted efficiently
to enyne compounds 2 and 4 in 50% and 41% yields, respectively
(entries 1 and 2). However, the reaction with methyl and ethyl vi-
nyl ketone afforded enyne compounds 5 and 6 in poor yields (en-
tries 3 and 4). In addition to these substrates, acrylamide, acrylic
acid, styrene, or acrylonitrile as the coupling partner could not give
the desired coupled products.
Evaluation of various reaction conditionsa
O
O
OtBu
Pd
2
OtBu
+
O2, base, r.t.
sovent, 4 h
2
1
3
Entry
Catalyst
Base
Solvent
Conv.b (%)
Selectivityb (2/3)
To further investigate the scope and limitation of this method-
ology, we carried out the cross-coupling of various aryl- and alkyl-
acetylenes with tert-butyl acrylate as summarized in Table 3. The
coupling reaction involving a straight chain alkyne, a hindered al-
kyne, and a cyclic alkyne proceeded to afford the corresponding
cross-coupling compounds 7, 8, and 9 in 72, 71, and 43% yields,
respectively (entries 1–3). In addition, the reactions of tert-butyl
acrylate with an aryl bearing an electron-donating group (methoxy
and dimethylamino) afforded compounds 10 and 11 in good yields
(entries 4–5). On the contrary, although the cross-coupling still oc-
curs when employing an aryl bearing an electron-deficient group
such as p-trifluoro methyl and p-nitrophenylacetylene, the yields
are low at 39% and 33% yields, respectively (entries 9 and 10).
We believe that the acidity of the terminal acetylenic proton plays
a role in the product composition. The compounds bearing less
acidic protons give better selectivity than more acidic substrates.
This can be explained by the fact that the increased acidity of cer-
tain substrates allows them to quickly react to form reactive palla-
dium-alkynyl intermediates, which then undergo a homo-coupling
process more easily. However, the less acidic substrates are not as
reactive, thus the formation of the palladium-alkynyl complexes is
much slower, and the complexes react more selectively with ole-
fins to generate the desired cross-coupling products. Overall, the
kinetic of the palladium intermediate governs the yields of the
enyne products.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17c
18d
19e
20f
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd2dba3
PdCl2(PPh3)2
Pd(PPh3)2
None
Pd(TFA)2
Pd(TFA)2
Pd(TFA)2
Pd(TFA)2
Pd(TFA)2
Pyridine
TEA
DIPEA
Na2CO3
K2CO3
None
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
Toluene
DMA
DMSO
MeCN
THF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
37
100
100
100
100
12
0/100
32/68
34/66
55/45
57/43
23/77
—
50/50
0/100
26/74
31/69
22/78
25/75
—
0
100
100
88
66
100
100
0
0
100
62
51
39
100
—
67/33
47/53
50/50
53/47
70/30
a
All reactions were carried out with
1 (0.31 mmol) and tert-butyl acrylate
(1.24 mmol) in the presence of 2 mol % of Pd and base (0.62 mmol).
b
Calculated by GC analysis.
Under air condition.
Under N2 condition.
Under Ar condition.
c
d
e
f
10 equiv of tert-butyl acylate under O2 condition.
We believe that this reaction may be the first example of
coupling a terminal acetylene with an olefin, where a Heck type
mechanism may be involved. Based on a mechanism proposed
by Cheng, Martensson, and our previous research results,8 we
postulated that this coupling reaction undergoes process similar
to the sp2 counterparts (Scheme 2). The reaction can be initiated
by the formation of an alkynyl palladium complex II via base-as-
sisted deprotonation. The second incorporation of an alkenyl
group can be carried out by migratory insertion, which would
be followed by b-hydride elimination to produce cross-coupling
product IV and Pd(0) species. Molecular oxygen would then oxi-
of cross-coupling product 2 and homocoupled product 3 than or-
ganic bases (entries 4 and 5). Among the bases evaluated, K2CO3
was the best in the coupling reaction.
In addition, we demonstrated the coupling reactions in various
solvent systems. There was no observable cross-coupling reaction
when toluene was used (entry 7). In the cases of THF and acetoni-
trile, the reactions were incomplete; on the other hand, 4-ethynyl-
toluene was consumed in polar solvents such as DMF, DMA, and
DMSO. However, only in the DMF and DMA solvent systems was
the desired enyne product 2 obtained in modest yields.
a
peroxopalladium complex VI,9
On the basis of these results, we screened other reaction vari-
ants, such as atmosphere, sources of palladium, loading of catalyst,
and concentration to determine optimal conditions. Varying the
palladium source showed that palladium trifluoroacetate has bet-
ter selectivity to generate the cross-coupled product 2 (entry 16).
However, in the presence of Pd2dba3 and PdCl2(PPh3)2, coupling
reactions were converted mostly to homocoupled compound 3
(entries 12 and 13). We found that the reaction did not proceed
at all in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (entry 14). Under an air, nitro-
gen, or argon atmosphere, the conversion was not complete and
selectivity was lower (entries 17–19). Many efforts to minimize
the formation of the homocoupled product from the reaction of
acetylide were investigated, such as slow addition of acetylene
via a syringe pump and using large excess of olefins (>10 equiv);
however, none of these methods helped suppress formation of
the Glasier-type side product, which results in decreasing the over-
all yield of the cross-coupling product. Overall, although the homo-
coupling reaction of acetylide cannot be avoided under various
reaction conditions due to its high reactivity, we found that the
oxidative palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions between acey-
lide and olefin afforded (E)-selective enyne product in our protocol.
With optimized conditions in hand, we carried out the coupling
reaction with various olefins and 4-ethynyltoluene. As shown in
dize the resulting Pd(0) to
which can react with another alkyne compound to regenerate al-
kyne–Pd–L complex II. This reactive intermediate would react
with either the olefin or the alkyne. However, the stronger affin-
ity of alkynes is responsible for the formation of the homocou-
pled side product.
Table 2
The effect of various olefin with 4-ethynyltoluenea
O
Olefin (8 eq.)
R
Pd(TFA)2
O2, K2CO3, r.t.
DMF, 4 h
Entry
Olefin
Product (yield)b
1
2
3
4
R:OtBu
OEt
Me
2 (50%)
4 (41%)
5 (45%)
6 (25%)
O
R
Et
a
All reactions were carried out with 4-ethynyltoluene (0.31 mmol), olefin
(3.1 mmol), Pd(TFA)2 (2 mol %), and K2CO3 (0.62 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL).
b
Isolated yields.