Figure 1. Structures of dendritic molecules 1, 2, and 3.
Several methods have been used to prevent aggregation and
increase quantum efficiencies, for example, the use of
polyelectrolytes or surfactants.
of dendritic molecules. We thus decided to synthesize
dendritic compounds 1-3 (Figure 1) and study their fluo-
rescent sensing applications.
Conjugated polyelectrolytes have been applied to the
detection of metals due to their efficient static quenching
properties with quenchers.9 In some recent studies, surfac-
tants were also used to enhance the fluorescence quantum
yields of hydrophobic conjugated polymers containing hy-
drophilic side chains.10 The dominant hydrophobic interac-
tions between surfactants and fluorophores can significantly
reduce the aggregation. An application of surfactants for
amplification of the quenching effect between the fluorescent
polymers and quenchers has also been reported.11
The fluorescent linear polymers poly(phenylene-ethy-
nylenes) substituted by carboxylate groups have been
reported to exhibit a quenching effect by Hg2+ in aqueous
mediaintheabsenceandpresenceofavidin,withStern-Volmer
constant (Ksv) values of 104 and 105 M-1, respectively.12
Despite offering high sensivity, the unpredictable secondary
and tertiary structures in solution, due to a wide number of
repeating fluorophores and random molecular conformations
in linear conjugated polymers, can lead to inconsistent
quenching effects and inexplicable behaviors.
Diphenylacetylene is selected as the repeating fluorescent
unit for its known high fluoresence quantum yield and
structural rigidity. To make the dendritic compounds water-
soluble, carboxyl or quaternary ammonium groups have been
installed as the peripheral groups. The compounds were
synthesized by a convergent approach as outlined in Scheme
1. The reactive core, 4,4′,4′′-triiodotriphenylamine 4, was
prepared from the iodination of triphenylamine using ben-
zyltrimethylammonium iododichloride (BnMe3-ICl2).13 The
peripheral building blocks, methyl 4-ethynyl benzoate 5 and
N,N-dimethyl-4-ethynylaniline 6, were obtained through the
Sonogashira coupling14 of trimethylsilylacetylene with the
corresponding aryl iodide and a subsequent base-catalyzed
desilylation. With the required building blocks in hands, we
proceeded with the Sonogashira coupling between 4 and 5
followed by the hydrolysis of triester 7 to afford ionizable
fluorophore 1. Similarly, the reaction between 4 and 6 gave
rise to the triamine 8, which was treated with an excess of
MeI to provide the polycationic fluorescent compound 2. In
order to obtain the first generation fluorescent dendrimer 3,
we carried out a reaction of the core 4 with 1 molar equiv
of trimethylsilylacetylene to obtain the branch building blocks
9. The Sonogashira coupling of 9 with 5 followed by
desilylation gave the dendron 10, which was coupled with 4
to afford hexaester 11. The hydrolysis of 11 eventually
afforded first generation fluorescent dendrimer 3 in moderate
yield.15
In comparison with linear polymers, the numbers of
fluorophore units in dendrimers can be controlled by a
stepwise synthesis. This should reflect in the more predictable
fluorescence property and other structure-related behaviors
(8) Zhu, X.-J.; Fu, S.-T.; Wong, W.-K.; Guo, J.-P.; Wong, W.-Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3150–3154.
(9) McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. ReV 2000,
100, 2537. Thomas, S. W.; Joly, G. D.; Swager, T. M. Chem. ReV 2007,
107, 1339–1386.
The effects of surfactants on the photophysical properties
of 1-3 were studied. Without the surfactant, compounds 1-3
displayed absorption peaks around 370-375 nm. In the
presence of the surfactant Triton X-100, these bands were
slightly red-shifted to 379-383 nm. The spectral shifts
(10) (a) Chen, L. H.; Xu, S.; McBranch, D.; Whitten, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 9302–9303. (b) Gaylord, B. S.; Heeger, A. J.; Bazan, G. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 896–900. (c) Burrows, H. D.; Lobo, V. M. M.;
Pina, J.; Ramos, M. L.; Seixas de Melo, J.; Valente, A. J. M.; Tapia, M. J.;
Pradhan, S.; Scherf, U. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 7425–7427. (d) Kaur,
P.; Yue, H; Wu, M.; Liu, M.; Treece, J.; Waldeck, D. H.; Xue, C.; Liu, H.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 8589–8596. (e) Pu, K.-Y.; Pan, S. Y.-H.; Liu,
B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9295–9300.
(13) Kajigaeshi, S.; Kakinami, T.; Moriwaki, M.; Fujisaki, S.; Maeno,
K.; Okamoto, T. Synthesis 1988, 545–546.
(11) Dalvi-Malhotra, J.; Chen, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 3873–
3878.
(14) (a) Devadoss, C.; Bharathi, P.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 9635–9644. (b) Pesak, D.; Moore, J. S. Macromolecules 1997,
30, 6467–6482. (c) Nantalaksakul, A.; Dasari, R. R.; Ahn, T.-S.; Al-Kaysi,
R.; Bardeen, C. J.; Thayumanavan, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2981–2984. (d)
Zhang, X.; Ren, X.; Xu, Q. H.; Loh, K. P.; Chen, Z. K. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 1257–1260.
(12) (a) Kim, I.-B.; Dunkhorst, A.; Gilbert, J.; Bunz, U. H. F.
Macromolecules 2005, 38, 4560–4562. (b) Kim, I.-B.; Bunz, U. H. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2818–2819. (c) Kim, I.-B.; Phillips, R.; Bunz,
U. H. F. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 814–817.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2769