Y. Chu et al. / Phytochemistry 102 (2014) 55–63
59
whose parent enzymes share 81% sequence similarity, is
constructed by combining the entire N-terminal domain of
AtUGT71C1 with the entire C-terminal domain of AtUGT71C3.
The acceptor specificity of the chimeric enzyme is similar to
AtUGT71C1, while the donor specificity of the chimeric enzyme
matches AtUGT71C3. Its catalytic activity is between that of
AtUGT71C3 and AtUGT71C1 (Weis et al., 2008). Another chimeric
UGT was described in which the entire N-terminal domain of
AtUGT74F2 was fused to the entire C-terminal domain of
AtUGT74F1. The parent enzymes for this chimera share 90%
sequence similarity. The chimeric UGT displays similar acceptor
specificity to the parent enzyme AtUGT74F2, but its catalytic activ-
ity is significantly decreased relative to the parent enzyme
AtUGT74F1 (Cartwright et al., 2008). These results indicate that
the N- and C-terminal domains can be substituted to alter acceptor
and donor specificities in chimeric enzyme, but these specific rec-
ognitions are not sufficient for efficient catalytic reactions. The
overall fit of acceptor and donor into their binding pockets as well
as exact positioning and stabilization of acceptor and donor at the
interface between domains play an essential role in the glucosyl-
transfer reaction from donor to acceptor (Osmani et al., 2009).
Thus, a minimal C-terminal region containing the PSPG motif be-
tween the parent enzymes UGT72E2 and UGT72E3 that share
91% sequence similarity enhanced the catalytic activity of
UGT72E3 towards sinapyl alcohol (1), leading to higher production
of syringin (2). Based on established substrate preferences of
UGT72E enzymes (Lanot et al., 2006; Lim et al., 2001), transgenic
plants were generated expressing the parental genes UGT72E2
and UGT72E3 and the chimeric genes UGT72E2/3 and UGT72E3/2
to compare their syringin (2) and coniferin (4) productions in
planta.
As expected from their predicted 3D structures (Fig. 2B), chimeric
UGT72E2/3 and UGT72E3/2 retained the substrate specificity of the
parental enzymes UGT72E2 and UGT72E3. In contrast, the syringin
(2) or coniferin (4) production of these chimeric enzymes towards
their specific substrates was significantly changed; the leaves of
the UGT72E2/3 OE plants accumulated 21% less coniferin (4) than
its parental UGT72E2 OE plants, while those of UGT72E3/2 OE
plants accumulated 45% more syringin (2) than UGT72E3 OE plants
(Fig. 3C). These results suggest that the substitution of a partial C-
terminal region containing the PSPG motif between highly homol-
ogous but catalytically different UGTs is a good strategy to gener-
ate a novel chimeric UGTs altering the catalytic activity without
disturbing the acceptor specificity. The C-terminal 30% of the
UGT72E2 sequence including the PSPG motif contributes to the
determination of donor specificity and stabilization of the donor
in the donor binding pocket, meanwhile the N-terminal 70% of
the UGT72E3 sequence including the entire N-terminal region,
the inter-domain linker, and part of the C-terminal region deter-
mines acceptor specificity and the correct positioning of acceptor
and donor at the interface between domains (Osmani et al.,
2009). The kinetic data of UGT72E enzymes and their chimeras
combined with site directed mutagenesis may enable identifica-
tion of relevant amino acids.
Although the chimeric UGT72E3/2 increased syringin (2) pro-
duction in the leaves of UGT72E3/2 OE plants, it was not sufficient
to produce it in plants effectively. To find the other factors affecting
syringin (2) production, an in vitro assay was performed using
crude protein extracts from homozygous transgenic plants over-
expressing the UGT72E gene family. In contrast to UGT72E3,
UGT72E3/2 was able to increase syringin (2) production signifi-
cantly in the presence of high concentration of sinapyl alcohol
(1), indicating that the limited production of syringin (2) in the
leaves of the UGT72E3/2 OE plant was due to a lack of sinapyl
alcohol (1) (Fig. 4). In leaves of Arabidopsis plants, most sinapyl
compounds are converted to sinapoyl malate to protect the plant
Fig. 4. Syringin (2) or coniferin (4) production by crude protein extracts from UGT-
overexpressing transgenic plants in the presence of coniferyl alcohol (3) or sinapyl
alcohol (1). Effects of coniferyl alcohol (3) and sinapyl alcohol (1) supplements on
coniferin (4) and syringin (2) production in the protein extracts of transgenic plants
overexpressing UGT72E2, E3, E2/3, and E3/2 were investigated following the method
described in section ‘Glucosyltransferase activity assay with crude protein extract
from transgenic plants’. Syringin (2) and coniferin (4) production levels were
defined as nmol of generated glucosides per 1 g protein before and after reaction for
60 min. (A) Generated coniferin (4) and (B) syringin (2) levels in the in vitro
reactions. Results are represented as mean S.D. from at least three replicates.
increased expression and CCR2, COMT, and CAD4 genes have nor-
mal high expression.
Discussion
Recent structural data for several plant UGTs clearly demon-
strate that these proteins have two functionally distinct domains.
The acceptor binding site is mainly formed by residues in the
N-terminal domain, and the donor binding site is formed in the
C-terminal domain and flanked on one side by a PSPG motif
(Paquette et al., 2003). These domains pack very tightly by inter-
and intra-domain interactions, resulting in formation of a deep,
narrow catalytic site where the acceptor and donor binding sites
come close enough together to catalyze the glucosyltransfer reac-
tion at the interface (Osmani et al., 2009). Using these function–
structure relationships of UGTs,
a partial domain swapping
between UGT72E2 and UGT72E3 was performed to generate a no-
vel UGT that efficiently catalyzes syringin (2) production via the
transfer of glucose from UDP-glucose to the C4-OH position of
sinapyl alcohol (1).
The successful engineering of chimeric enzymes is most likely
to occur when the parent enzymes have a high sequence identity
and high conservation of intra- and inter-domain interactions
(Osmani et al., 2009). For example, the chimeric enzyme UGTN1C3,