alkylidene ketoacid derivatives would provide an opportunity
to incorporate synthetically useful substituents on the second
carbonyl (eq 2). However, the reaction would generate
mixtures of diastereomers, a situation that could be rectified
through the use of alkylidene ketoamides. We have already
demonstrated that the protonation event in the asymmetric
Stetter is highly diastereoselective,4d and it has been well-
documented that tertiary ꢀ-ketoamides, bearing a stereocenter
between the carbonyls, are configurationally stable due to
strong A1,3 strain in the enolate.9 Interestingly, catalytic
asymmetric transformations that generate ketoamide stereo-
centers are surprisingly rare.10
in 68% yield, 82% ee, and 6:1 dr (Table 1, entry 1). When
the diethylamide is employed, the product 9 is obtained
in similar yield, high dr, but lower ee (Table 1, entry 2).
The use of a phenylketone on the Michael acceptor results
in a nearly racemic product 10 (Table 1, entry 3). With
longer alkyl ketone substituents, the product 11 is formed
in 92% yield, 89% ee, and 5:1 dr (Table 1, entry 4). Lastly,
we found that optimal conditions involved conducting the
reaction at 0 °C (Table 1, entry 5).
A primary concern at the outset of this study was the
configurational stability of the newly formed stereocenters.
A control experiment using 20 mol % precatalyst 3 and 1
equiv of Hu¨nig’s base was performed in carbon tetrachloride
at 0 °C, shown in Table 2. It was found that the conversion
A Knoevenagel reaction of various ketoamides and
aldehydes generates the requisite substrates 5 as single
olefin isomers.11 Adducts were subjected to our previously
developed reaction conditions, Table 1. At ambient
Table 2. Control Experiment To Test for Epimerization
Table 1. Screen of Michael Acceptors
entry
time (h)
conversion (%)a
ee (%)b
entry
R
R′
product
yield (%)a
ee (%)b
drc
1
2
3
4
5
1
3
5
8
12
18
38
47
65
90
92
92
92
92
92
1
2
3
Me
Me
Et
Me
Me
Me
8
9
10
11
11
68
66
60
92
90
82
77
7
89
92
6:1
14:1
14:1
5:1
Ph
Et
4
a Reaction conducted with 1 equiv of 1 and 2 equiv of 12 at 0 °C. b See
Table 1.
5d
12:1
a Reaction conducted with 1 equiv of 7 and 2 equiv of Michael acceptor
at 23 °C. b Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral
stationary phase. Diastereomer ratio determined by H NMR. d Reaction
c
1
conducted at 0 °C.
of 11 gradually increases with reaction time, with the
reaction complete in 12 h. Fortunately, no epimerization
was observed under these basic conditions, consistent with
our hypothesis.
temperature, the carbene derived from triazolium salt 3
catalyzes the reaction of glyoxamide 7 with ꢀ-keto-amide
derived Michael acceptors in good to excellent yield and
high diastereoselectivities. As shown in Table 1, with a
dimethylamide Michael acceptor, the product 8 is isolated
A series of Michael acceptors with different substitution
were then synthesized and tested using the optimized reaction
conditions, with the results shown in Table 3. When the
alkylidene substituent is a methyl group, the product 14 is
obtained in excellent yield and 89% ee, with 7:1 dr (Table
2, entry 1). Similar results are observed with other alkyl
substituents (Table 2, entry 3-5). The reaction also tolerates
a variety of functional groups; substrates with tethered benzyl
ether, olefin, and alkyne give desired products in excellent
enantioselectivities and good diastereoselectivities (Table 2,
entries 7, 9, 10). Compounds with tethered halogen or
protected aldehyde are also obtained in good yield and good
stereoselectivities (Table 2, entry 8, 11). Substrates with
different ketone R groups were also made and subjected to
the optimized reaction conditions. When R is propyl, the
Stetter adduct 34 is generated in 92% yield, 92% ee, and
11:1 dr (Table 2, entry 12). Finally, substrate 37 with a
tethered olefin on the ketone leads to product 38 in 94%
yield, 90% ee, and 9:1 dr.
(6) (a) Enders, D. In StereoselectiVe Synthesis; Springer-Verlag: Heidel-
berg, Germany, 1993. (b) Enders, D.; Breuer, K. ComprehensiVe Asymmetric
Catalysis; Springer: New York, 1999; pp 1093-1104. (c) Nahm, M. R.;
Linghu, X.; Potnick, J. R.; Yates, C. M.; White, P. S.; Johnson, J. S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2377–2379. (d) Nahm, M. R.; Potnick, J. R.;
White, P. S.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2751–2756.
(7) Enders, D.; Han, J.; Henseler, A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3989–3991.
(8) Liu, Q.; Perreault, S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14066–
14067.
(9) (a) Evans, D. A.; Ennis, M. D.; Le, T.; Mandel, N.; Mandel, G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1154–1156. (b) Ogata, M.; Yoshimura, T.;
Fujii, H.; Ito, Y.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 1993, 728–730. (c) Bartroli, J.; Turmo,
E.; Belloc, J.; Forn, J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3000–3012. (d) Duan, M.;
Paquette, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3789–3792. (e) Smith, A. B.,
III; Brandt, B. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1685–1688. (f) Flores-Morales, V.;
Fernandez-Zertuche, M.; Ordonez, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14,
2693–2698. (g) Sharma, K. K.; Boddy, C. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2007, 17, 3034–3037.
(10) Kim, M.-h.; Choi, S.-h.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lee, J.; Nahm, K.; Jeong, B.-
S.; Park, H.-g.; Jew, S.-s. Chem. Commun. 2009, 782–784.
(11) (a) Hensel, M. J.; Palmer, J. T.; Learn, K. S.; Fuchs, P. L. Synth.
Commun. 1986, 16, 1297–1314. (b) Inokuchi, T.; Kawafuchi, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 947–953. (c) Ryabukhin, S. V.; Plaskon, A. S.; Voloch-
nyuk, D. M.; Pipko, S. E.; Shivanyuk, A. N.; Tolmachev, A. A. J. Comb.
Chem. 2007, 9, 1073–1078.
In order to explain the stereochemistry of this transforma-
tion, a plausible mechanism is proposed in Scheme 1.
Reaction of glyoxamide 7 with carbene derived from 3 will
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2857