M. Minu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2960–2964
2963
.2
.1
tion was determined by the absence of growth. MIC was deter-
mined by the lowest concentration of sample that prevented the
development of turbidity. From the MIC values observed, the inter-
mediate concentrations between MIC values were prepared and
the accurate MIC values were determined.
QSAR analysis. The calculation34–40 of molecular descriptors of
hexahydroindazole derivatives as well as the regression analysis
was carried out by using the molecular package TSAR 3D version
3.3.46
0.0
-.1
-.2
Acknowledgments
Authors are grateful to the All India Council of Technical Educa-
tion, New Delhi, India for the financial support and University of
Delhi, India, for providing necessary research facilities to carry
out this work.
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
Observed pMICsa
Supplementary data
Figure 2. Plot of residual pMICsa values against the experimental pMICsa values for
the linear regression developed model by Eq. (1).
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
results of QSAR studies indicated that the topological parameters,
the second order molecular connectivity index and valence second
order molecular connectivity index, 2v and 2vv can be used
successfully for modeling antimicrobial activity of hexahydroin-
dazoles. The validity of models obtained by linear and multiple
linear regressions are clearly evidenced by the high q2 values
obtained for the developed QSAR models.
References and notes
1. Fidler, D. F. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998, 4, 169.
2. Oren, I.; Temiz, O.; Yalcin, I.; Sener, E.; Altanlar, N. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 7,
153.
3. Hong, C. Y. J. Farmaco 2001, 56, 41.
4. Macchiarulo, A.; Constantino, G.; Fringuelli, D.; Vecchiarelli, A.; Schiaffella, F.;
Fringuelli, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3415.
Melting points were determined in open glass capillary using
Bells India melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. The infra-
red (IR) spectra were recorded with Shimadzu 8400S-FTIR spectro-
photometer in KBr discs. The 1H NMR spectra in CDCl3 were
recorded on Bruker-DPX 300 NMR spectrophotometer using TMS
as an internal standard. Mass spectra were measured on a Shima-
dzu 2010A spectrophotometer. Elemental analysis was performed
on a Perkin–Elmer 2400 C, H, N analyzer and values were within
the acceptable limits of the calculated values (within 0.4%). The
homogeneity of the compounds was monitored by ascending thin
layer chromatography (TLC) on Silica Gel-G coated aluminum
plates, visualized by iodine vapour and UV light. Developing
solvent was chloroform/methanol (9.8:0.2).
General procedure for synthesis of 3-substituted-3,3a,4,5,6,7-hexa-
hydro-2H-indazoles (1–3). The solution of hydrazine hydrate
(0.03 mol) and appropriate p-substituted benzylidene cyclohexa-
nones (0.01 mol) in methanol (200 ml) was refluxed for 2–3 h.
The above reaction mixture was cooled and kept at 0 °C for 24 h.
The precipitated product was filtered, washed with methanol and
recrystallized from a mixture of methanol–hydrazine hydrate.
General procedure for the synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted-
3,3a,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-2H-indazoles (4–21). To the solution of 1–3
(0.004 mol) in pyridine (20 mL) was added an equimolar quantity
of appropriate sulfonyl chlorides, and the mixture was heated on
a water bath for 2–4 h. Then the reaction mixture was cooled,
poured into dilute HCl and the solid thus obtained was filtered,
washed with water and recrystallized from alcohol.
5. Hatya, S. A.; Aki-sener, E.; Tekiner-Gulbas, B.; Yildiz, I.; Temiz-Arpaci, O.; Yalcin,
I.; Altanlar, N. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 1398.
6. Raikova, S. V.; Shub, G. M.; Luneva, I. O.; Golikov, A. G.; Bugaev, A. A.; Kriven’ko,
A. P. Antibiot. Khimioter. 2005, 50, 18.
7. Raikova, S. V.; Shub, G. M.; Golikov, A. G.; Kriven’ko, A. P. Antibiot. Khimioter.
2004, 49, 21.
8. Chuanmin, Q.; Yulan, L.; Zhizhong, J. Zhongguo Yaowu Huaxue Zazhi 1997, 7, 88.
9. Nasr, M. N. A.; Said, S. A. Archiv der Pharmazie 2003, 336, 551.
10. Minu, M.; Thangadurai, A.; Wakode, S. R.; Agrawal, S. S.; Narasimhan, B. Archiv
der Pharmazie 2008, 341, 231.
11. Narasimhan, B.; Kothwade, U. R.; Pharande, D. S.; Mourya, V. K.; Dhake, A. S.
Indian J. Chem. 2003, 42, 2828.
12. Narasimhan, B.; Belsare, D.; Pharnde, D.; Mourya, V.; Dhake, A. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2004, 39, 827.
13. Narasimhan, B.; Mourya, V. K.; Dhake, A. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16,
3023.
14. Narasimhan, B.; Mourya, V. K.; Dhake, A. S. Pharm. Chem. J. 2007, 41, 133.
15. Narasimhan, B.; Rakesh, N.; Vikramjeet, J.; Ruchita, O.; Sucheta, O. ARKIVOC
2007, XV, 112.
16. Narasimhan, B.; Vikramjeet, J.; Rakesh, N.; Ruchita, O.; Sucheta, O. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5836.
17. Gangwal, N. A.; Narasimhan, B.; Mourya, V. K.; Dhake, A. S. Indian J. Het. Chem.
2003, 12, 201.
18. Narasimhan, B.; Ansari, A. H.; Singh, N.; Mourya, V. K.; Dhake, A. S. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 1067.
19. Narasimhan, B.; Kumari, M.; Jain, N.; Dhake, A. S.; Sundaravelan, C. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4951.
20. Narasimhan, B.; Kumari, M.; Dhake, A. S.; Sundaravelan, C. ARKIVOC 2006, xiii,
73.
21. Kumar, A.; Narasimhan, B.; Kumar, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4113.
22. Narasimhan, B.; Dhake, A. S.; Mourya, V. K. ARKIVOC 2007, 1, 189.
23. Ruchita, O.; Sucheta, O.; Vikramjeet, J.; Rakesh, N.; Ahuja, M.; Narasimhan, B.
ARKIVOC 2007, XIV, 172.
24. Kabli, R. A.; Kaddah, A. M.; Khalil, A. M.; Khalaf, A. A. Indian J. Chem. 1986,
25, 152.
25. Khalaf, A. A.; El-Shafei, A. K.; El-Sayed, A. M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1982, 19, 609.
26. Ozbach, G. Y.; Scab, D. Acta Chim. (Budapast) 1975, 86, 449.
27. Sayed, G. H. Indian J. Chem. 1980, 19, 364.
28. Nester, W. E.; Roberts, C. E.; Nester, M. T. In Microbiology—A Human Perspective;
Wm. C. Brown Communications Inc: Dubuque, 1995; pp 655–656.
29. Collins, C. H.; Lyne, P. M. In Mirobiol. Methods, 3rd ed.; Butterworth: London,
1970; pp 414–427.
30. Cappucino, J. G.; Sherman, N. In Microbiology—A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.;
Addison Wesley Longman Inc.: California, 1999; pp 263–265.
31. Pharmacopoeia of India; Ministry of Health Department: Govt. of India: New
Delhi, 1996; Vol. II, pp A-100-124.
32. Sharma, P.; Rane, N.; Gurram, V. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 4185.
33. Hansch, C.; Fujita, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1616.
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity. The synthesized compounds
were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activity using tube
dilution method.28–30 In this method, 1 mL of 10
lg/mL of test
solution in DMSO was transferred to a sterile test tube containing
1 mL of sterile nutrient media and serially diluted to give a concen-
tration of 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312 lg/mL. To all the tubes, 0.1 mL of
microbial suspension in saline was added and the tubes were
incubated at 37 °C for 24 h (bacteria) and 48 h for C. albicans and
at 25 °C for 7 d in case of A. niger (fungi). After the incubation
period the tubes were observed visually for turbidity and inhibi-