.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Comparison of several PEPPSI precatalysts for the cross-
coupling of a variety of five-membered-ring heterocycles (10) and
2-propylzinc bromide (19).
As 11 could be coupled with six-membered heteroaro-
matic compounds with complete selectivity using 9,[5a] it
would appear that the five- and six-membered-ring congeners
are strikingly different in their reactivity, the former being
much more difficult to cross-couple with any level of
selectivity. This encouraged us to carry out a thorough
sweep of the literature, and strikingly, we found that there
are no reported scope studies for the general and selective
coupling of secondary alkyl fragments to five-membered-ring
heterocycles, including 5,6-fused systems where the site of
oxidative addition is in the five-membered ring (i.e., at the C2
or C3 position of e.g., indole, benzofuran).[8] Given the high
importance of such compounds, the dearth of published
results speaks to the difficulty of this coupling. Herein, we
disclose the first comprehensive report on the Pd-catalyzed
cross-coupling of secondary alkyl organometallics to produce
these highly prized products.
Normal (N) to rearranged (R) product ratio[a]
Given the surprising, but consistent poor preliminary
results in Scheme 1 with the heterocyclic oxidative-addition
partners, the first and easiest structural feature to investigate
was the impact of bond angles, and thus possible size (steric)
effects that are due to changes in the bond angles in the five-
versus the six-membered ring. One might argue that with the
smaller bond angles in the five-membered ring, there is
a reduced steric footprint/influence in the transition state for
b-hydride elimination (BHE), which we have demonstrated
to be the key to mitigate migratory insertion (MI).[5a] When
we submitted the indenyl analogue to the same transforma-
tion, the reaction proceeded well, cleanly providing the
desired, non-rearranged isomer (15A). Given the direct
physical comparison between the aromatic compounds lead-
ing to 13A or 14A with 15A, it is difficult to implicate
reduced steric effects into the rationale for the poor
selectivity. The fact that MI is the primary reaction path
taken whether the coupling is occurring at the C2 or
C3 position of the five-membered ring also makes it challeng-
ing on first glance to implicate electronic or coordination
effects. Concurrently, we investigated the electronic features
of these heterocycles by computational studies, and the
corresponding finding will be discussed below.
Moving forward, we hypothesized that if the ligandꢀs bulk
was brought further into the coordination sphere of Pd, we
could make up for any lost steric impact of the five-membered
ring. Furthermore, this might also override any unfavorable
electronic features that the five-membered heterocycles
impart on the critical steps of RE and BHE.[5a] To this end,
two catalysts, Pd-PEPPSI-IHept[9] (17) and Pd-PEPPSI-
IHeptCl (18;[10] Figure 2), were applied to this cross-coupling
along with 9 and its analogue Pd-PEPPSI-IPent (16),[5b, 11]
which is not chlorinated in the NHC core (Table 1).
2-Propylzinc bromide (19), while a seemingly simple sub-
strate, is actually the most challenging secondary organome-
tallic reagent to cross-couple selectively owing to the max-
imum number of hydrides that enable BHE, and thus MI, to
occur.
Product
IPent (16)
IPentCl (9)
IHept (17)
IHeptCl (18)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1:9.4
1:1
2.7:1
1:3
1:9
1:18
1:6
5.5:1
24:1
20.7:1
5:1
3:1
1:1
1:1.5
3:1
9:1
1.1:1
1:3
1:8
9:1
only N
only N
only N
6:1
2:1
23:1
7.2:1
trace
only N
n.r.
1:2[b]
1.3:1[c]
[a] Unless otherwise indicated, reactions proceeded to the coupled
products will full conversion. [b] Reaction proceeded to 22% conversion.
[c] Reaction proceeded to 17% conversion.
chlorinated analogues were much more selective. In the case
of IHeptCl (18), the branched product was always formed as
the major one, and in many cases, N was the only isomer
produced. Coupling at the C3 position in the five-membered
ring (entries 1–4) is noticeably more selective than at the
C2 position (entries 5–8) for all heteroaromatic compounds
studied. Whereas it could be argued that steric effects
influence the selectivity with N-substituted indoles (e.g.,
27), this would seem less likely for benzothiophene and
benzofuran substrates. Certainly, the physical presence of the
fused benzene ring is more noticeable at the C3 position, but
the same trend is observed in its absence (see Table 2). A
substrate survey revealed that this trend of greater intrinsic
selectivity at the C3 than at the C2 position was also observed
with simple five-membered heterocycles. With 2-propylzinc
bromide, methyl 2-thiophenecarboxylate reacted with high
selectivity at the C3 position (31), whereas no selectivity was
observed at the C2 position (30). With a 4-piperidenylzinc
derivative, both furan (29) and thiophene (32) electrophiles
coupled with no visible MI, providing the desired products in
excellent yield. Again, methylindole could be coupled with
complete selectivity at the C2 position (34), whereas some
interesting diheteroatom-containing structures reacted with
2-propyl- (33 and 36) and 3-pentylzinc bromide (35) with
good to excellent selectivity. Collectively, these results suggest
that there is a pronounced electronic effect that differentiates
the C2 and C3 positions, assuming for now that there is no
coordination to Pd.
When considering the data in Table 1, a number of trends
become apparent. In most cases, IPent (16) and IHept (17)
actually led to greater amounts of the MI product (i.e., R)
than of the desired branched product (i.e., N), whereas their
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9502 –9506