M. Narasimhulu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 3125–3127
3127
TPSO
R3
TPSO
O
R2
R1
a
b
H
R2
R1
+
22a. R1 = R2 = H, R3 = β - OH
5. R1 = R2 = H
4
22b. R1 = R2 = H, R3 = α - OH
6. R1 = OBn, R2 = H
23a. R1 = OBn, R2 = H, R3 = β - OH
23b. R1 = OBn, R2 = H, R3 = α - OH
24a. R1 = OBn, R2 = OMe, R3 = β - OH
24b. R1 = OBn, R2 = OMe, R3 = α - OH
7. R1 = OBn, R2 = OMe
TPSO
R3
R2
c
1a,1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b
R1
25a. R1 = R2 = H, R3 = β - OH
25b. R1 = R2 = H, R3 = α - OH
26a. R1 = OH, R2 = H, R3 = β - OH
26b. R1 = OH, R2 = H, R3 = α - OH
27a. R1 = OH, R2 = OMe, R3 = β - OH
27b. R1 = OH, R2 = OMe, R3 = α - OH
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, THF, 0 °C–rt, 2 h, 90%; (b) 10% Pd/C, MeOH, rt, 8 h, 95%; (c) PTSA, MeOH, rt, 1 h, 95%.
cancer cell lines such as THP-1 and U-937 (leukemia), and A-375
(melanoma). It is evident from the results that the test compounds
have shown significant cytotoxic activity on all tested cell lines in a
concentration-dependent manner (Table 1). Test molecules were
classified as low active or high active based on their IC50 values.
In this study, compounds 2a and 2b showed significant cytotoxic
activity in all the test cell lines, although they were still less active
than the more widely used anti-cancerous drug derived from nat-
ural products, etoposide. By comparing the cytotoxic activities of
these compounds, we found that compounds 3a and 3b were also
shown to have significant cytotoxic potency in the U-937 cell line
similar to 2a and 2b.
Table 1
§IC50 values for antiproliferative activities of compound 1a, 2a and 3a and their
isomers 1a, 2a and 3b against cancer cell linesa
Compound
THP-1 (lg/mL)
U-937 (
lg/mL)
A-375 (lg/mL)
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
99.75 0.4
40.50 0.21
12.82 0.89
12.62 0.69
42.66 1.59
72.22 4.49
1.27 0.09
128.25 0.3
187.74 10.6
31.09 8.07
32.99 5.03
27.66 5.92
32.67 4.88
10.56 0.70
147.75 0.7
164.25 0.2
56.30 3.88
57.78 5.02
69.11 8.63
75.24 3.4
2.31 0.08
Etoposideb
a
Exponentially growing cells were treated with different concentrations of test
compounds for 48 h and cell growth inhibition was analyzed through MTT assay.
§IC50 is defined as the concentration, which results in a 50% decrease in cell number
as compared with that of the control cultures in the absence of an inhibitor and
were calculated using the respective regression analysis. The values represent the
mean SE of three individual observations.
Experimental section. General experimental procedures are
described in the Supplementary data.
Supplementary data
b
Etoposide was employed as positive control.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
reported value in literature,8 which fixed the stereochemistry of
the newly generated hydroxy group at C-5 is in b orientation. Also,
the relative stereochemistry of 1,3-diol in 1a and 1b was estab-
lished by their conversion to the corresponding acetonide. The
syn and anti relative configuration of the hydroxy groups was con-
firmed by the analysis of 13C NMR spectrum,10 which showed sig-
nals at d 30.1 and 19.8 for the two methyl groups and d 98.4 for the
quaternary carbon of the acetonide in syn 1,3-diol, while in the anti
1,3-diol acetonide having signals at d 24.52 and 24.54 for the two
methyl groups and d 100.4 for the quaternary carbon. Similarly, the
relative stereochemistry of 1,3 diols in 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b was
established by converting them to corresponding acetonides,
respectively, and studying their 13C NMR chemical shift values.
The biological activities of diarylheptanoids (1a, 2a and 3a) and
their isomers (1b, 2b and 3b) were evaluated to investigate their
anti-proliferative activities in three different types of human
References and notes
1. Roughley, P. J.; Whiting, D. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 2379.
2. Lee, K. K.; Bahler, B. D.; Hofmann, G. A.; Mattern, M. R.; Johnson, R. K.; Kingston,
D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1407.
3. Vogel, E.; Pelletier, S. J. Pharm. 1815, 2, 50.
4. Gescher, A.; Pastorino, U.; Plummer, S. M.; Manson, M. M. Brit. J. Clin. Pharm.
1998, 45, 1.
5. Shureiqui, I.; Reddy, P.; Brenner, D. E. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2000, 33, 157.
6. Matsuda, H.; Ishikado, A.; Nishida, N.; Ninomiya, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Kobayashi, Y.;
Yoshikawa, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2939.
7. (a) Ali, M. S.; Tezuka, Y.; Awale, S.; Banskota, A. H.; Kadota, S. J. Nat. Prod. 2001,
64, 289; (b) Lee, S.-L.; Huang, W.-J.; Lin, W. W.; Lee, S.-S.; Chen, C.-H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 6175; (c) Shin, D.; Kinoshita, K.; Koyama, K.; Takahashi, K.
J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1315.
8. Hashimoto, T.; Tori, M.; Asakawa, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1986, 34, 1846–1849.
9. Gibtner, T.; Hampel, F.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Hirsch, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 68, 408.
10. Rychnovsky, S. D.; Rogers, B. N.; Richrdson, R. I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 9.