Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 and 2 Used for the Nondestructive
Colorimetric Resin Test
Figure 1. Strategy for a nondestructive colorimetric resin test: resin-
bound amines and thiols are monitored by reacting with an activated
ester of a reagent, and after the resin test a dye moiety is removed
by treatment with Bu4NF to regenerate the resin via a 1,6-
elimination process.
solid-phase reactions.4 Although the NMR techniques have
the advantage that samples can be reused after analysis, they
are not suitable for rapid monitoring of functional group
transformations. Overall, chromatographic and spectroscopic
methods for the detection of on-resin reactions are neither
simple nor convenient, and they require relatively long times
for analysis.
As part of efforts to develop simple and rapid methods
for monitoring functional groups on the resin-supported
molecules without the need for specialized instrumentation,
colorimetric monitoring tools have been explored.5 These
methods are based on the technique of staining resins that
contain specific functional groups. As a result, the progress
of a solid-phase reaction can be readily monitored by
examining the level of color of the stained resin using eye
or microscopic detection. For example, the Kaiser ninhydrin
test, widely used for SPPS, has been employed to determine
the presence of a primary aliphatic amine on a resin.6
However, this test is limited to primary aliphatic amines,
and it sometimes leads to false positives due to the harsh
reaction conditions that are used (1-5 min, 100 °C). The
TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid) test has also been
used to detect on-resin amines, but this method also gives
positive results with any resin-bound base.7
is present in cysteine and other small molecules that are
frequently modified with other functional groups. Polymer-
supported substances possessing thiol groups can be moni-
tored by using the NF31 procedure.9 Other functional groups,
such as halogens, alcohols, carboxylic acids, and carbonyl
groups can be monitored on solid supports by using colo-
rimetric methods.5
Although colorimetric resin tests have been successfully
employed to monitor the progress of on-resin reactions, most
of these methods are limited by the fact that samples can
not be reused for the next reactions after resin tests, and as
a consequence, the need for repetitive colorimetric resin tests
causes a large sample loss. Therefore, the development of a
rapid, simple, and nondestructive method to detect the
progress of on-resin reactions remains as a significant
challenge. Below, we describe the results of a study that has
led to the first, resin-reusable, colorimetric method for
polymer-bound primary amine, secondary amine, and thiol
detection.
The new, nondestructive, colorimetric resin test involves
treatment of solid-supported amines and thiols with a dye
containing an activated ester group. This leads to the rapid
formation of intensely colored beads. Subsequent removal
of a colored moiety from solid support after the resin test is
performed regenerates the resin for the repetition of the
reaction (in case of incomplete reactions) or a subsequent
reaction. The molecular system used for this process consists
of three parts, including a dye for color detection, an activated
To improve these old techniques, several colorimetric resin
tests, including chloroanil and NF31 tests, have been
developed to analyze the extent of completeness of reactions
carried out on a polymeric matrix.8 The detection of resin-
bound thiol groups is also important since this functionality
(4) (a) Seeberger, P. H.; Beebe, X.; Sukenick, G. D.; Pochapsky, S.;
Danishefsky, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 491–493. (b) Kanemitsu,
T.; Wong, C.-H.; Kanie, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3591–3599. (c)
Mogemark, M.; Elofsson, M.; Kihlberg, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1463–1466.
(5) Gaggini, F.; Porcheddu, A.; Reginato, G.; Rodriquez, M.; Taddei,
M. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 805–810.
(6) Kaiser, E.; Colescott, R. L.; Bossinger, C. D.; Cook, P. I. Anal.
Biochem. 1970, 34, 595–598.
(8) (a) Marik, J.; Song, A.; Lam, K. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4319–
4320. (b) Madder, A.; Farcy, N.; Hosten, N. G. C.; De Muynck, H.; De
Clercq, P. J.; Barry, J.; Davis, A. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2787–2791.
(9) Caroen, J.; Van der Eycken, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 41–44.
(7) Hancock, W. S.; Battersby, J. E. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 71, 260–
264.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 15, 2009
3439