The acid-catalyzed transacetylation of thiazolidines and
related compounds attracted our closer attention as a possible
extension of the latter heterocycle formation process.
Thiazolidines 3 were selected as simple models to identify
equilibration conditions for DCL formation. In spite of a
literature report on the reversible formation of thiazolidines
under basic conditions,8 this transformation has not been
previously reported as useful for DCC. 4-Carboxyl ethyl-2-
arylthiazolidines can be readily obtained by condensation of
aldehydes (1) and cysteine ethyl ester (2) in EtOH at room
temperature (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Optimization of Thiazolidine Exchange Reaction of 3a
entry reaction conditionsa time (h) 3a/3b ratiob 2 (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pH 4, rt
pH 4, rt
pH 4, rt
pH 5, rt
pH 5, rt
pH 5, rt
pH 6, rt
pH 6, rt
pH 6, rt
pH 7, rt
pH 4, 35 °C
pH 4, 35 °C
24
48
72
24
48
72
24
48
72
72
24
48
45/55
44/56
46/54
71/29
68/32
52/48
96/4
97/3
90/10
98/2
3
2
10
5
10
9
0
Scheme 1. Thiazolidine Formation from Cysteine
0
0
0
9
10
11
12
45/55
35/65
18d
16e
a Starting concentration of each component was 1 mM; the reaction
mixture was stirred in a buffered acetate solution at pH 4 and pH 5, and in
a phosphate solution at pH 6 and pH 7. b Ratio was determined by 1H NMR.
c Mass balance was quantitative. d Total yield 3a + 3b (64%). e Total yield
3a + 3b (49%).
The discovery of new reversible reactions compatible with
an aqueous environment is an important objective for the
use of biomolecules as templates in DCLs. We screened
different aqueous conditions, with variations in pH and
reaction time, in order to establish optimal thermodynamic
exchange conditions for the thiazolidine exchange. The
reaction of 3a with equimolar amounts of p-Cl-benzaldehyde
(1b) at room temperature was used as a reference (Table 1).
Thermodynamic equilibration of a mixture of 3a and 1b
occurred at pH 4 over 24 to 48 h at room temperature.9 After
3 d, heterocycles 3a and 3b were stable in the aqueous
environment and thiazolidines (90-98%) and ester 2
(2-10%) were recovered (entries 1, 2, and 3). Equilibration
at pH 5 was slower, but after 3 d, the ratio indicated that
equilibrium was reached (entries 4, 5, and 6). Equilibration
at pH 6 was not complete after 3 d at rt (entries 7, 8, and 9).
Equilibration at pH 7 did not proceed during 3 d at rt (entry
10) and the presence of ester 2 was not detected. The method
of choice for blocking further equilibration is a simple raise
of pH to 7; since we did not observe any further equilibration
at this pH, the yields of recovered products were quantitative.
When the temperature was increased to 35 °C at pH 4,
the equilibration occurred faster, but significant amounts
of cysteine ester 2 were observed. The total recovered
yield for thiazolidines was 64 and 49% after 1 and 2 d,
respectively (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). The mass balance
was decreasing, probably due to ester hydrolysis in
compound 2.
Thiazolidines 3a and 3b have different stabilities depend-
ing on pH; at pH 4-5 thiazolidine hydrolysis occurs to an
acceptable extent (2-10%) at rt over 3 d. Temperature seems
to play an important role in these systems; higher temper-
(2) (a) Cacciapaglia, R.; Di Stefano, S.; Mandolini, L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 13666–13671. (b) Fuchs, B.; Nelson, A.; Star, A.; Stoddart,
J. F.; Vidal, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4220–4224. (c)
Cacciapaglia, R.; Di Stefano, S.; Mandolini, L.; Mencarelli, P.; Ugozzoli,
F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 186–195.
(3) Berkovich-Berger, D.; Lemcoff, N. G. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1686–
1688.
(4) Lemcoff, N. G.; Fuchs, B. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 731–734.
(5) (a) Star, A.; Goldberg, I.; Fuchs, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 2685–2689. (b) Star, A.; Goldberg, I.; Fuchs, B. J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 630, 67–77.
Scheme 2
.
Exchange Reaction between Thiazolidines 3a and
Aldehydes 1b,1d-fa
(6) (a) Sutton, L. R.; Donaubauer, W. A.; Hampel, F.; Hirsch, A. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 1758–1759. (b) Wu, Y.-C.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 9522–9524.
(7) Wipf, P.; Mahler, S. G.; Okumura, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4483–
4486.
(8) (a) Woodward, G. E.; Schroeder, E. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59,
1690–1694. (b) Szilagyi, L.; Gyorgydeak, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
427–432.
(9) Typical procedure: A solution of compound 3a (20.8 mg, 0.09 mmol)
and p-Cl-benzaldehyde (12.3 mg, 0.09 mmol) in a mixture of acetate buffer
at pH 4 (63 mL) and MeOH (27 mL) was stirred at rt for 2 d. The pH was
raised to 7 by adding a saturated solution of NaHCO3, and the reaction
mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo (temperature should never
exceed 22 °C). The residue was analyzed by 1H NMR to determine the
ratio and products were confirmed by preparative isolation of 3a + 3b (26
mg, 98% yield).
a Yields in parentheses reflect the equilibrium distribution. The ratio
was determined by H NMR and confirmed by preparative isolation.
1
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 15, 2009
3171