meta-Phosphonobenzoic Acid: A Precursor for the Design of Hybrid Materials
3-Phosphonobenzoic Acid (2): Compound 1 (22.12 g; 81.25 mmol)
and concentrated HCl (37% in water, 300 mL) were mixed, and the
solution was heated at reflux for 21 h. The solution was concen-
trated in vacuo, and the resulting solid was dried in vacuo to pro-
duce 2 (16.05 g; 98% yield). Single crystals suitable for X-ray stud-
ies were directly isolated after a slow cooling of the acidic solution.
1 equiv.) was added dropwise to a stirred aqueous solution (60 mL)
of Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.488 g, 2.22 mmol, 1.5 equiv.). After
30 min, a white precipitate started to be formed. The solution was
stirred for 3 d, and the precipitate was then recovered by filtration,
washed with water, rinsed with absolute ethanol and dried in air.
X-ray diffraction confirmed that the compound synthesized by this
way has the same structure as that obtained by hydrothermal syn-
3
1H NMR (300.13 MHz, D2O): δ = 7.38 (m, CH5), 7.77 (dd, JHP
= 12 Hz, 3J = 7 Hz, CH4), 7.89 (d, 3J = 8 Hz, CH6), 8.10 (dd, 3JHP thesis (0.385 g, 91% yield). IR (KBr): ν = 3374, 3340, 3093, 3006,
˜
4
= 14 Hz, J = 1 Hz, CH2) ppm. 31P NMR (121.49 MHz, D2O): δ 2898, 2855, 2690, 2609, 2573, 1698, 1635, 1599, 1584, 1484, 1430,
= 14.81 ppm. 13C NMR (75.47 MHz, D2O): δ = 129.32 (d, J =
1403, 1314, 1270, 1159, 1109, 1077, 1018, 1000, 979, 920, 912, 829,
14.5 Hz), 130.9 (d, J = 14.8 Hz), 131.72 (d, J = 11.4 Hz), 132.30 779, 749, 735, 679 cm–1. TGA (in air): 6.5% weight loss at about
(d, J = 184.0 Hz), 133.11 (d, J = 12.8 Hz), 135.51 (d, J = 10.5 Hz),
250 °C (6.3% of water calculated). C7H7O6PZn (283.48): calcd. C
169.80 (s) ppm. C7H7O5P (202.1): calcd. C 41.60, H 3.49; found C
29.66, H 2.49; found C 29.21, H 3.0.
41.92, H 3.67. IR (KBr): ν = 3079, 2890, 2845, 2681, 2572, 2292,
˜
Preparation of Zn3(H2O)2(PO3C6H4COO)2 (6): In a 50-mL PTFE
insert was dissolved 3-phosphonobenzoic acid (0.2 g, 0.98 mmol,
1 equiv.) in permuted water (15 mL). To this solution was added
Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.327 g, 1.48 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and urea
(0.089 g, 1.48 mmol, 1.5 equiv.). The insert was transferred into a
Berghof pressure digestion vessel and heated from room tempera-
ture to 160 °C over 18 h and then further heated at 160 °C for 40 h
and cooled to room temperature over 18 h. After filtration, the re-
sulting compound obtained as white crystallites was washed with
water, rinsed with absolute ethanol and dried in air (0.240 g, 86%
1700, 1679, 1603, 1581, 1449, 1407, 1320, 1273, 1163, 1111, 1085,
1014, 956, 853, 829, 755, 734, 687, 661 cm–1.
Preparation of Mn(H2O)(PO3C6H4COOH) (3) and Co(H2O)-
(PO3C6H4COOH) (4) by Hydrothermal Synthesis: In a 50-mL
PTFE insert was dissolved 3-phosphonobenzoic acid (0.2 g,
0.98 mmol, 1 equiv.) in permuted water (15 mL). To this solution
was added the desired transition metal salt [1.5 equiv.;
MnCl2·4H2O (0.294 g, 1.48 mmol) for
3 or Co(NO3)2·6H2O
(0.432 g, 1.48 mmol) for 4] and urea (0.089 g, 1.48 mmol,
1.5 equiv.). The insert was transferred into a Berghof pressure di-
gestion vessel and heated from room temperature to 160 °C over
18 h and then further heated at 160 °C for 40 h and cooled to room
temperature over 18 h. After filtration, the resulting compounds,
obtained as light brown (for 3) or purple (for 4) crystallites, were
washed with water, rinsed with absolute ethanol and dried in air.
yield). IR (KBr): ν = 3375, 3317, 3268, 3224, 3182, 3059, 1717,
˜
1700, 1684, 1653, 1613, 1587, 1567, 1559, 1542, 1507, 1497, 1474,
1456, 1429, 1397, 1278, 1228, 1176, 1111, 1097, 1076, 1050, 1031,
1002, 975, 881, 825, 764, 754, 695, 667 cm–1. TGA (in air): 4.9%
weight loss at about 315 °C (5.7% of water calculated).
C14H12O12P2Zn3 (630.33): calcd. C 26.68, H 1.92; found C 26.64,
H 2.44.
Compound 3: Yield: 0.198 g (73%). IR (KBr): ν = 3448, 3378, 3095,
˜
3003, 2894, 2852, 2686, 2602, 2567, 1699, 1598, 1583, 1483, 1428,
1403, 1311, 1269, 1158, 1109, 1091, 1002, 984, 920, 910, 827, 749,
732, 683, 659 cm–1. TGA (under N2): 5.8% weight loss at about
310 °C (6.6% of water calculated). C7H7MnO6P (273.04): calcd. C
30.79, H 2.58; found C 30.29, H 2.71.
XRD Investigations: XRD investigation was performed by using
Mo-Kα radiations on a Kappa CCD (Bruker Nonius) diffractometer
equipped with a CCD (charge coupled device) detector. Large Ω-
and Φ-scans were used to both control the crystalline quality of
different samples and determine the unit cell parameters. Single
crystals of suitable size were then selected. Considering the cell pa-
rameters and the spot size (i.e. mosaicity) suitable data collection
strategies have been defined. A scanning angle of 0.8° and a Dx
(detector–sample distance) value of 34 mm were chosen; Φ- and Ω-
scans were used. To collect a great number of weak reflections, but
avoiding any detector saturation by reflections of strong intensity,
different exposure times were used to collect the data. The dif-
fracted intensities were collected up to θ = 40°. Following the sym-
metry of the crystal, one independent monoclinic or orthorhombic
space was scanned. Plots of reciprocal lattice planes assembled
from these series of experimental frames are sufficiently accurate
to obtain an overall view of the reciprocal space. The conditions
limiting the possible reflections were then observed and the possible
space groups identified. The EvalCCD software[23] was used to ex-
tract reflections from the collected frames and reflections were
merged and rescaled as a function of the exposure time. Data were
corrected from absorption by using the Sadabs program[24] devel-
oped for scaling and correction of area detector data. Structural
models were built up from Patterson map analysis (heavy atoms
method) for 3, 4 and 6 and with superflip[25] by using charge-flip-
ping methods for phase 2. The model was subsequently introduced
in the refinement program Jana2006,[26] and all the atomic posi-
tions were refined and anisotropic atomic displacement parameters
(ADP) were considered for all the atoms. At this step of the refine-
ment, the hydrogen atoms can be located. The decreasing law of
the diffusion factor as a function of sinθ/λ implies that the main
contribution of the hydrogen atoms to the diffracted intensity is
condensed in the beginning of the diffraction patterns. Difference
Compound 4: Yield: 0.101 g (38%). IR (KBr): ν = 3412, 3379, 3092,
˜
2990, 2895, 2855, 2723, 2690, 2611, 2573, 1697, 1627, 1599, 1584,
1486, 1431, 1404, 1317, 1270, 1159, 1111, 1005, 992, 975, 920, 831,
749, 736, 679 cm–1. TGA (in air): 7% weight loss at about 195 °C
(6.5% of water calculated). C7H7CoO6P (277.04): calcd. C 30.35,
H 2.55; found C 30.33, H 2.69.
Preparation of Compound 3 by Soft Chemistry: An aqueous solu-
tion (30 mL) of 3-phosphonobenzoic acid (0.6 g, 2.96 mmol,
1 equiv.) was added to a stirred aqueous solution (20 mL) of
Mn(CH3COO)2·4H2O (1.09 g, 4.47 mmol, 1.5 equiv.). The solution
was stirred overnight. The white precipitate formed was filtered,
washed with water, rinsed with absolute ethanol and dried in air.
X-ray diffraction confirmed that the compound synthesized by this
way has the same structure as that obtained by hydrothermal syn-
thesis (0.66 g, 810% yield).
Preparation of Zn(H2O)(PO3C6H4COOH) (5) Hydrothermal Syn-
thesis: In a 50-mL PTFE insert was dissolved 3-phosphonobenzoic
acid (0.1 g, 0.49 mmol, 1 equiv.) in distilled water (15 mL). To this
solution was added Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.162 g, 1.48 mmol,
1.5 equiv.). The insert was transferred into a Berghof pressure di-
gestion vessel and heated from room temperature to 160 °C over
18 h and then further heated at 160 °C for 40 h and cooled to room
temperature over 18 h. After filtration, the resulting compound ob-
tained as a white powder was washed with water, rinsed with abso-
lute ethanol and dried in air (0.095 g, 68% yield).
Preparation of Compound 5 by Soft Chemistry: An aqueous solu-
tion (30 mL) of 3-phosphonobenzoic acid (0.3 g, 1.48 mmol,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 4117–4125
© 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
4123