Chemistry Letters Vol.38, No.6 (2009)
525
.
Table 1. Examination of the reaction conditions
cided that 5 mol % TsOH H2O in refluxing benzene provided the
optimal conditions.
O
X mol%
Ph
Next, the scope and limitations of this reaction were exam-
ined (Table 2). The electronic environment on the aniline-aro-
matic-ring group was of no concern in this reaction; both elec-
tron-deficient and electron-rich aniline gave desired products 9
and 10 in good yields (88 and 66%, respectively, Entries 2 and
3). On the other hand, the sterically encumbered anilines sup-
pressed the reaction dramatically; o-methylaniline gave 11 in
only 40% yield (Entry 4), and no product was obtained when
2,6-dimethylaniline was used as the starting material (Entry 5).
Polycyclic analogs 13 and 146 were also obtained, although an
elevated temperature was required (in refluxing toluene) possi-
bly owing to the decreased hydride donor capabilities of these
substrates.
H
catalyst
N
+
H2N Ph
Benzene
reflux
N
Ph
N
Ph
6
Ph
Ph
5
8
Entry
Catalyst
.
TsOH H2O
X/mol %
Time/h
Yield/%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8a
9b
10c
TsOH H2O
.
10
5
2.5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5.5
8
12
8
5
23
9
8
10
9
74
73
59
22
12
19
0
0
70
66
.
TsOH H2O
TfOH
Tf2NH
TFA
AcOH
.
TsOH H2O
Aliphatic amines also participated in this reaction but spe-
cial caution was needed (Entry 8). In contrast to aromatic
amines, not only an elevated temperature (in refluxing toluene)
but also the in situ generation of imine before the addition of
.
TsOH H2O
.
TsOH H2O
aThe reaction was conducted at 60 ꢁC. In the presence of
MS3A. In the presence of MS5A.
b
c
.
TsOH H2O and the use of a slight excess of aldehyde (1.1 equiv
vs. amine) were required; due to its strong basicity compared
with aromatic amine, TsOH was probably deprotonated by the
remnant amine that did not participate in the formation of the
corresponding imine, and consequently, the acid could not work
as a catalyst.7
In summary, we have developed a promising catalytic ap-
proach to the quinazoline skeleton by Brønsted acid-induced
C–H functionalization. This method is applicable to various o-
formyl N,N-dialkyl-substituted anilines and amines (aromatic
and aliphatic). Further work on related reactions is in progress
to synthesize various heterocycles.
Table 2. Scope and limitations
Entry
1
Time/h
Yield/%
73
Product
Ph
N
8
N
N
N
Ph
8
Ph
Ph
Ph
Cl
N
2
3
4.5
6.5
88
66
Ph
9
OMe
N
Ph
References and Notes
10
1
For reviews, see: a) O. Meth-Cohn, H. Suschitzky, Adv. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1972, 14, 211. b) J. M. Quintela, Recent Res. Dev. Org. Chem.
2003, 7, 259. c) P. Matyus, O. Elias, P. Tapolcsanyi, A. Polonka-
Balint, B. Halasz-Dajka, Synthesis 2006, 2625.
N
4
5
5.5
40
N
N
Ph
11
12
2
a) W. Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, R. Visser, S. Harkema, J. Org.
Chem. 1984, 49, 269. b) W. H. N. Nijhuis, W. Verboom, D. N.
Reinhoudt, Synthesis 1987, 641. c) W. H. N. Nijhuis, W. Verboom,
D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3136. d) W. H. N.
Nijhuis, W. Verboom, A. A. El-Fadl, S. Harkema, D. N. Reinhoudt,
J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 199. e) W. H. N. Nijhuis, W. Verboom,
A. A. El-Fadl, G. J. van Hummel, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 209. f) A. Polonka-Balint, C. Saraceno, K. Ludanyi, A.
Benyei, P. Matyus, Synlett 2008, 2846. g) C. Zhang, C. K. De, R.
Mal, D. Seidel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 416.
Ph
Ph
N
13
Ph
Ph
N
6a
11.5
11.5
6
92
34
92
N
N
N
13
14
Ph
N
7a
3
4
For reviews on C-H functionalization, see: a) V. Ritleng, C. Sirlin, M.
Pfeffer, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1731. b) K. Godula, D. Sames, Science
2006, 312, 67. c) F. Kakiuchi, T. Kochi, Synthesis 2008, 3013.
a) W. Verboom, M. R. J. Hamzink, D. N. Reinhoudt, R. Visser,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 4309. b) X. Che, L. Zheng, Q. Dang, X.
Bai, Synlett 2008, 2373. During the preparation of our manuscript,
Seidel reported similar redox process promoted by TfOH, see: c) C.
Zhang, S. Murarka, D. Seidel, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 419.
Crystallographic data reported in this manuscript have been deposited
with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary
publication no. CCDC-717617.
N
Ph
8a,b
Ph
15
Ph
aIn toluene. bExcess amount of aldehyde (1.1 mol equiv vs.
amine) was used.
5
gave inferior results (Entries 4–7). At lower temperature (60 ꢁC),
the reaction was suppressed completely, giving only imine
(Entry 8). Some dehydrating agents (MS3A and MS5A) were in-
sufficient to improve the chemical yield (70 and 66%, respec-
tively, Entries 9 and 10). From the above investigations, we de-
6
7
The corresponding starting aldehydes were prepared as reported in
ref. 2d.
Supporting Information is available electronically on the CSJ-Journal