4
Tetrahedron Letters
9
10
11
3j
3k
3l
m-Me
m-Br
p-Br
Bn
Bn
Ph
p-CF3
p-CF3
p-CF3
4j-1+4j-2/65[d]
4k-1+4k-2(56:44)/57
4l-1+4l-2(62:38)/50
Br
O
R1
N
N
Ph-p-CF3
Ph-p-CF3
Ph-p-CF3
N
Ph-p-CF3
+
O
N
Br
N
O
N
O
Bn
Bn
Bn
O
R1 = H, R2 = Br,
R1 = Br, R2 = H,
4l-1
4l-2
5i
4k-1
4k-2
R2
[a] The reaction was performed on a 0.2 mmol sacle.
[b] Isolated yield.
[c] Besides 4i, 5i was obtained in 37% yield.
[d] The relative configuration is undetermined.
Based on the previous results, this transformation could be
hypothesized following two routes which were depicted in
Scheme 6: (1) Friedel-Crafts cyclization (Hypothesis 1, Scheme
6) [16, 18]; (2) the oxidative addition and reduction elimination
pathways (Hypothesis 2, Scheme 6) [19]. The formation of 2 and
4 is in accordance with the mechanism of Friedel-Crafts
cyclization [16, 18] (Scheme 6), therefore, the Friedel-Crafts type
mechanism was proposed (Hypothesis 1, Scheme 6). Apart from
this mechanism, it is also possible the transformation proceeded
through oxidative addition and reduction elimination pathways.
At the present stage, we cannot distinguish between these two
mechanisms, but we think that oxidative addition and reduction
elimination mechanism is less likely. For Hypothesis 2 (Scheme
6), the reactions would afford the products via Pd-catalyzed
seven-member-cyclic intermediates which were less stable in
principle and unfavorable to the transformation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a novel Pd(II)-promoted N-
Cl cleavage/N-arylation route to synthesis quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones
via cyclization process. The reaction proceeds with good
functional group compatibility and broad substrate scope.
Meanwhile, the present protocol also provides a method to not
only construct C-N bond efficiently but also to synthesize the
quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones in good to excellent yields under oxidant
and ligand-free conditions.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at
Acknowledgments
Hypothesis 1:
Cl
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant no. 21861031), Key Research and
Development project of Ningxia (2019BDE03002), the Ningxia
Cl
N
Pd(II)
N
R3
O
R3
O
N
R3
O
-Cl-, -Pd(II)
-H+
Pd(II)
R1
R1
R1
N
R2
N
R2
Natural Science Foundation of China (2018AAC03023
,
N
R2
NGY2018005, and NGY2018059), and the National First-rate
Discipline Construction Project of Ningxia (Chemical Engineering
and Technology) (NXYLXK2017A04).
or
R3 = CO2Et, Ar
1
3
2
4
or
Cl
N
R3
O
R1
Hypothesis 2:
References
N
R2
or
2
4
product or
Pd(II)
[1] (a) R. Liu, Z. Huang, M. G. Murray, X. Guo, G. Liu, J. Med. Chem. 2011,
54, 5747–5768; (b) L. Zhang, R. Qiu, X. Xue, Y. Pan, C. Xu, H. Li, L.
Xu, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 3529–3537; (c) M. Imanishi, M.
Sonoda, H. Miyazato, K. Sugimoto, M. Akagawa, S. Tanimori, ACS
Omega 2017, 2, 1875−1885;
[2] (a) S. A. Galal, S. H. M. Khairat, F. A. F. Ragab, A. S. Abdelsamie, M.
M. Ali, S. M. Soliman, J. Mortier, G. Wolber, H. El Diwani, Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2014, 86, 122–132; (b) A. M. S. E. Newahie, N. S. M. Ismail, D.
A. A. E. Ella, K. A. M. Abouzid, Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2016, 349,
309–326;
1
3
TFA
TFA
Cl
Pd(TFA)2
Pd
N
R3
N
R3
R1
R1
N
R2
O
N
R2
O
1
3
or
1
3
or
HCl
[3] Y.-M. Huang, N. S. Alharbi, B. Sun, C. S. Shantharam, K. P. Rakesh, H.-
L. Qin, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 181, 111566;
[4] Y. Deng, T. Wu, S.-Q. Zhai, C.-H. Li, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183,
111711;
Scheme 6. The plausible mechanisms for the transformation of 1
and 3.
It is interesting to see the reactions of 1j–1n and 3k, the former
gave two regioisomers 2j–2n, of which the sterically less
hindered products 2j-1–2n-1 were the major products due to the
steric effect (Figure 1, structures I and II). However, for the
latter, the sterically hindered 4k-1 was the major product (Table
2, entry 10). This difference was possibly due to the favorable
interaction formed between the substituent bromine and the
palladium at the transition state (Figure 1, structure III and IV).
Moreover, the oxygen (air) had a slightly influence on the
transformation (Table 1, entries 6 and 15; Scheme 5).
[5] D. A. E. Issa, N. S. Habib, A. E. Abdel, A. E. Abdel Wahab,
MedChemComm, 2015, 6, 202–211;
[6] M. Weïwer, J. Spoonamore, J. Wei, B. Guichard, N. T. Ross, K. Masson,
W. Silkworth, S. Dandapani, M. Palmer, C. A. Scherer, A. M. Stern, S. L.
Schreiber, B. Munoz, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1034–1038;
[7] For recent examples, see: (a) W. Wei, L. Wang, P. Bao, Y. Shao, H. Yue,
D. Yang, X. Yang, X. Zhao, H. Wang, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7125−7130;
(b) S. Toonchue, L. Sumunnee, K. Phomphrai, S. Yotphan, Org. Chem.
Front. 2018, 5, 1928–1932; (c) L. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Li, X. Hao, H.-Y.
Zhang, J. Zhao, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 3969–3977; (d) J. Xu, H.
Yang, H. Cai, H. Bao, W. Li, P. Zhang, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4698−4702;
(e) F. Lian, K. Xu, W. Meng, H. Zhang, Z. Tana, C. Zeng, Chem.
Commun. 2019, 55, 14685–14688; (f) L. Wang, H. Liu, F. Li, J. Zhao, H.-
Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 2354–2359; (g) Z.
Wei, S. Qi, Y. Xu, H. Liu, J. Wu, H. Li, C. Xia, G. Duan, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2019, 361, 5490–5498; (h) Q. Ke, G. Yan, J. Yu, X. Wu, Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 5863–5881;
Cl
R1 Pd(II)
N
Cl
Br Pd(II)
N
Cl
Cl
Pd(II)
N
Pd(II)
N
CO2Et
O
PH-p-CF3
Br
Ph-p-CF3
CO2Et
O
R1
N
N
N
O
N
O
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
[8] (a) G. A. Eller, B. Datterl, W. Holzer, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2007, 44,
1139–1143; (b) J. Gris, R. Glisoni, L. Fabian, B. Fernández, A. G.
Moglioni, Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1053–1056; (c) S. Gräßle, S.
Vanderheiden, P. Hodapp, B. Bulat, M. Nieger, N. Jung, S. Bräse, Org.
Lett. 2016, 18, 3598–3601;
I
II
III
IV
, favored
, favored
Figure 1. Tentative explanation for the regioselectivity of 2j–2n
and 4k.
[9] (a) S. Balalaie, M. Bararjanian, S. Hosseinzadeh, F. Rominger, H. Reza
Bijanzadeh, E. Wolf, Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 7294–7300; (b) Z. Xu, G.
Martinez-Ariza, A. P. Cappelli, S. A. Roberts, C. Hulme, J. Org. Chem.