Page 3 of 7
Journal Name
RSC Advances
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA12772F
4.98 (s, 4H, ꢀNH2), 8.34 (s, 2H, >NH). FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3338,
3290(>NꢀH), 3195, 2966, 2931, 2875, 1656 (>C=O), 1503, 1375,
1306, 1062, 949, 637. Elemental analysis data’s for C12H20N4O4S: C,
45.56; H, 6.37; N, 7.71; S, 10.14. Found: C, 45.46; H, 6.41; N, 7.69;
S, 10.05.
3. Results and Discussion
The synthesis route of the thiophene derivatives (T1-T4) is presented
in the Scheme 1. The formation of thiophene derivatives (T1-T4) was
confirmed by their IR, NMR and mass spectral studies. IR spectra
of thiophene derivatives (T1-T4) exhibited the absorption band due
to NꢀH in the region 3308ꢀ3222 cmꢀ1, nꢀpropyl band at 2969ꢀ2962
cmꢀ1, C=O bond at 1678ꢀ1641cmꢀ1 along with all other bands. The
1HꢀNMR results supports the IR observations. The representative
1HꢀNMR spectrum of T1 is discussed here. The spectrum showed
triplet in the region of δ, 0.9ꢀ1.06 (J = 7 ꢀ 7.2). A multiplet appeared
at δ 1.7ꢀ1.9 ppm is due to the –CH2ꢀ group. A triplet appeared in the
region of δ 4.2 – 4.3 ppm due to protons of –OCH2ꢀ with the
coupling constant J = 6.7 – 6.9. A triplet appeared at the region of δ
7.0 – 7.5 due to protons of C4. A singlet appeared at the region of 8.6
due to protons of –N=CHꢀ. A characteristic singlet appeared at δ
11.2 is assigned to proton of –CONHꢀ. In the compounds (T1-T4),
the peak due to azomethine was not observed and a singlet around δ
2.3ppm due to protons of –CH3 group was observed along with all
other functional protons. The mass spectrum of representative
compounds T1 displayed the molecular ion peak m/z (M+) at 504.
The elemental analysis confirms the purity of the compounds.
Synthesis of chemical structures of the compounds T1, T2, T3 and T4
is given in Scheme 1. Individual chemical structure of the
compounds T1, T2, T3 and T4 is given in supplementary section
(Fig.S1).
General procedure for synthesis of bis-hydrazides (T1-T4)
A clear solution of 0.005 mole of 3, 4ꢀdisubstituted thiophene carboꢀ
hydrazide in 15 mL of absolute ethanol was mixed with 0.5 mL of
conc. hydrochloric acid. To this 0.01 mole of appropriate carbonyl
compound, dissolved in 10 mL of absolute ethanol was added slowly
while stirring. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 4 h and
cooled to 10oC. The precipitated product was separated by filtration
and reꢀcrystallized from an appropriate solvent. The physical and
characterization data of all newly synthesized compounds are
presented in Table 4.1. Spectral data of some of the compounds are
given below along with their reꢀcrystallization solvent.
3,4-Dipropoxy-N2,N5-bis(thiophen-2-ylmethylene)thiophene-2,5-
dicarbohydrazide (T1)
o
M.P: 259ꢀ260 C. FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1) υ: 3222 (ꢀNHꢀ), 2966 (propyl),
1
1641 (>C=O) and 1592 (>C=Nꢀ); H NMR (DMSOꢀd6, 400 MHz) δ
in ppm: 0.9 (t, 6H, ꢀCH3, J=6.9Hz ), 1.7 (m, 4H, ꢀCH2ꢀ,), 4.2 (t, 4H, ꢀ
OCH2ꢀ J=6.7 Hz), 7.1 (t, 2H, C4ꢀthiophene), 7.4 (d, 2H, C5ꢀ
thiophene) and 7.6 (d, 2H, C3ꢀthiophene, J=4Hz), 8.6 (s, 2H, ꢀ
N=CHꢀ), 11.2 (s, 2H, ꢀCONHꢀ); MS (m/z, %): 504 (M+, 100), 378
(50), 352 (20), 294 (40), 227 (20), 169 (30), 154 (40). Elemental
analysis; C22H24N4O4S3: Estimated C, 52.36%; H, 4.79%; N,
11.10%; S, 19.06%. Found: C, 52.30 %; H, 4.68 %; N, 11.32%; S,
19.11%.
EtOOC
S
COOEt
HO
EtOOC
OH
COOEt
1) NaOEt, EtOH
2) HCl/H2O
+
O
O
S
3,4-dipropoxy-N2,N5-bis(1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethylidene)thiophene-
2,5-dicarbo hydrazide (T2)
1
EtO
OEt
K2CO3, DMF
C3H7Br
o
M.P:253ꢀ254 C. FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1) υ: 3304 (ꢀNHꢀ), 2962 (propyl),
1
1678 (>C=O) and 1626 (>C=Nꢀ); H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ in
ppm: 1.0 (t, 6H, ꢀCH3 propyl, J=7.2Hz ), 1.9 (m, 4H, ꢀCH2ꢀ, J=7.2Hz
), 2.3 (s, 6H, ꢀCH3), 4.3 (t, 4H, ꢀOCH2ꢀ, J=6.9 Hz), 7.0 (t, 2H, C4ꢀ
thiophene), 7.4 (m, 4H, C3 and C5ꢀthiophene). Elemental analysis;
C24H28N4O4S3, Calculated C, 54.11%; H, 5.30%; N, 10.52%; S,
18.06%. Found: C, 54.01%; H, 5.22%; N, 10.62%; S, 18.09%.
3,4-Dipropyloxy-N2,N5-bis[1-(3-thienyl)ethylidene]thiophene-2,5-
dicarbo hydrazide (T3)
H7C3O
EtOOC
OC3H7
COOEt
H7C3O
OC3H7
O
NH2NH2, H2O
EtOH
NH
O
H2N
S
2
S
3
NH
NH2
Conc HCl
o
M.P: 256ꢀ257 C. FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1) υ: 3308 (ꢀNHꢀ), 2969 (propyl),
1675 (>C=O), 1535 (>C=Nꢀ); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ in
ppm: 1.06 (t, 6H, ꢀCH3 of propyl, J=7.2 Hz ), 1.88 (m, 4H, ꢀCH2ꢀ),
2.33 (s, 6H, ꢀCH3), 4.28 (t, 4H, ꢀOCH2ꢀ), 7.31 (d, 2H, C4ꢀof
thiophene, J=16.2 ), 7.62 (s, 2H, C2ꢀ of thiophene), 7.71 (d, 2H, C5ꢀ
of thiophene, J=4.5 ), 10.13 (s, 2H, ꢀNHꢀ). Elemental analysis data’s
for C24H28N4O4S3: C, 54.11%; H, 5.30%; N, 10.52%; S, 18.06%.
Found: C, 54.02%; H, 5.22%; N, 10.59%; S, 18.15%.
where R1 is H, CH3
H7C3O
NH
OC3H7
O
R2
N
S
S
S
Br
R1
R2 is
S
O
NH
N
4a - d
R1
R2
T1ꢀT4
3,4-Dipropyloxy-N2,N5-bis[1-(2-bromo-2-
thienyl)ethylidene]thiophene-2,5-dicarbohydrazide (T4)
Scheme 1. Synthesis of T1-T4, thiophene based derivatives.
3.1. Photoalignment studies
o
M.P: 214ꢀ215 C. FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1) υ: 3307 (ꢀNHꢀ), 2967 (propyl),
1677 (>C=O), 1548 (>C=Nꢀ). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ in
ppm: 1.0 (t, 6H, ꢀCH3 propyl, J=7.2 Hz), 1.9 (m, 4H, ꢀCH2ꢀ,
J=7.2Hz), 2.3 (s, 6H, ꢀCH3), 4.3 (t, 4H, ꢀOCH2ꢀ, J=6.9 Hz), 7.0ꢀ7.5
(m,4H, C3 and C4ꢀthiophene). MS (m/z, %): 691 (M+1, 100), 473
(30), 387 (20). Elemental analysis; C24H26Br2N4O4S3,calcd:C,
41.75%; H, 3.80%; N, 8.11%; S; 13.93%. Found: C, 41.84%; H,
3.87%; N, 8.18%; S; 13.85%.
The UV/Vis absorption spectra of T1-T4 exhibited a peak at 366,
366, 363 and 363 nm, respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Due to the
similarity in the chemical structure one can observe similar
wavelength for all the reported compounds here.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
J. Name., 2012, 00, 1ꢀ3 | 3