R. S. Montani et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 5231–5234
5233
second-order reflection in the small angle region corresponding to
a
b
c
the layer stacking in addition to a diffuse reflection in the wide
region occurring from lateral distances between molecules, while
the layer spacing dependence upon temperature exhibits the usual
shape: an increase with temperature in the SmC phase, related to
the tilt angle variation (17° at 105 °C), and a very slight decrease
in the SmA phase, related to the nematic order parameter decrease
(Fig. 2b).
For this mesogen, a direct comparison can be made between the
XRD interlamellar distance of 39.9 Å observed at 120 °C in the SmA
phase and the PM3 calculated L-values. So, the molecular length L
of 3a was calculated both with the oxyethylene chain in an all-anti
conformation and with gauche conformations while the methylene
chain always was in an all-anti fashion. Accordingly, the calculated
lengths were 43.7 Å and 38.8 Å, respectively. Again, the likeness
between the experimental d-value and the calculated L-value indi-
cates that the oxyethylene chains are in a predominantly gauche
fashion within the SmA phase, a conclusion that can be extended
on thermodynamical grounds to the lower temperature SmC
phase. In addition, the calculation of the molecular coverage S of
3a of the smectic layer10 by using the molecular volume11 and
the interlamellar distance gives a value for the molecular area
S = V/d of 24 Å2, a value close to the cross-sectional area of one aro-
matic core (ca. 22 Å2). Hence, the efficient packing of the aromatic
core in the smectic layer is the dominating ordering force despite
the laterally protruding oxyethylene chains which could be inter-
twined within the layer just as in the crystalline phase of 1a to
maximise the filling of space.
Figure 3. Schematic representations of the SmA phase of 3a.
in the X-ray pattern which could be associated to any related in-
plane periodicity. Moreover, this organisation is not likely to oc-
cur due to the expected micro-segregation between aliphatic and
oxyethylene chains which are known to exhibit different amphi-
pathic properties. This later argument can also be used to rule
out a single-layer organisation formed by mesogens pointing all
upwards (Fig. 3b). The arrangement shown in Figure 3c has the
polar and non-polar tails segregated into dipolar interactions that
results in a smectic layer periodicity near 80 Å. However, only a
sharp reflection corresponding to d = 39.1 Å was again observed
in low angle part of the diffraction patterns obtained with a Gui-
nier camera that could record periodicities up to 90 Å. Likely, the
organisation is locally of the double layer type, but with a corre-
lation distance (d/2 = L) associated to the distinction of the ali-
phatic and oxyethylene sublayers shorter than the overall
correlation length d associated to the smectic organisation. This
would explain the absence of the reflection associated to the
double layer and be satisfactory upon the expected micro-segre-
gation of aliphatic and oxyethylene tails.
There are different possibilities to consider for the layer stack-
ing of 3a. Although the arrangements shown in Figure 3a and b
agree with the observed periodicity, a local packing with the
mesogens pointing upwards and downwards (Fig. 3a) is not con-
sistent with the existence of the SmC phase and there is no signal
a
The comparison between the mesomorphic behaviours of the
calamitic 3a and dimer 5a with those of their fully aliphatic ana-
logues 3b and 5b can be done to assess the effect of the oxyethyl-
ene terminal tail on the smectic phase stabilities. Indeed, the data
given in Table 1 show that the global mesomorphic behaviour of
the two pairs of compounds does not depend on the terminal chain
nature but rather on the overall molecular architecture. Thus, both
3a and 3b show SmC and SmA phases with comparable transition
enthalpies, while both 5a and 5b show non-tilted smectic phases
(SmB with mosaic textures containing homeotropic domains/
SmA with focal conic and homeotropic textures) and nematic
phase with comparable transition enthalpies. Despite the fact that
the smectic phase stability is somewhat reduced, 3a still shows an
appreciable smectic range. But the presence of two oxyethylene
tails in the dimer 5a significantly decreases the smectic range,
most probably due to its symmetric molecular design (polar/ri-
gid/non-polar/rigid/polar).
Therefore, although we are aware that the real conformations
could be changed by the neighbourhood molecules, and therefore
the application of calculated conformations should be handled
with care, the combination of experimental and modelling infor-
mation on these three-block polyphilic molecules indicates that a
substantial fraction of gauche conformations persist in the oxyeth-
ylene chains up to the isotropisation temperatures; and that their
presence does not prevent the occurrence of lamellar organisations
provided that amphipathicity is preserved in the molecular design.
In this context, 1a is a valuable smectogenic building block for
amphipathic functional organic materials.
0
5
10
15
2θ (°)
20
25
30
b
40.0
39.5
39.0
38.5
38.0
SA
SC
100
110
120
130
140
150
Temperature (ºC)
Figure 2. (a) X-ray pattern of 3a in the SmA phase at 130 °C. (b) X-ray Temperature
dependence on heating of the lamellar distance of 3a.