4792
L. R. Odell et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4790–4793
To further explore the effect of large hydrophobic groups in the
(4m) compounds were twofold less potent than 4e (IC50 = 10.1
1.1 M and 13.2 1.5 M vs 3.3 0.6 M, respectively) demon-
strating a preference for a phenol group in the 30-position. Rewar-
dingly, the introduction of carboxylic acid rendered the
nanomolar potent inhibitor, 4n (IC50 = 0.38 0.02 M).
In summary, three small series of trisubstituted 3-amino-imi-
dazo[1,2-a]pyridines have been investigated as MtGS inhibitors.
The compounds represent the first non-amino acid derived inhibi-
tors of this enzyme. The most effective compounds possessed low
6-position, we decided to prepare a series of compounds where the
halogen was exchanged for various aryl moieties. The target com-
pounds were designed to explore the available chemical space and,
in the case of 3o increase solubility and H-bond potential. These
molecules were smoothly prepared via microwave-assisted Suzuki
cross-coupling reactions23–25 utilizing either aryl bromide 3f or the
corresponding 6-boronic acid pinacol ester derivative, which was
prepared from 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester
according to Table 1. Compound 3q was synthesized as per 3c,
however MeOH was replaced by phenol in the Ullman reaction.
In addition, treatment of 3r under catalytic hydrogenation condi-
tions (Pd/C, H2) afforded the saturated phenylethylene derivative
3s. These compounds were then assessed for their ability to inhibit
MtGS and the results are reported in Table 2.
l
l
l
a
l
micromolar (3f, IC50 = 8.8 0.4
IC50 = 3.3 0.6 M) or nanomolar potency (4n IC50 = 0.38
0.02 M). Compound 4n was significantly more active than both
MSO (IC50 = 51 M) and PPT (IC50 = 1.9 0.4 M) the most po-
lM, 3g, IC50 = 4.8 0.5 lM, 4e,
l
l
6
l
l
tent known MtGS inhibitors. Given their drug-like nature, we antic-
ipate they will serve as important lead compounds in the search for
new anti-tuberculosis agents. The chemistry established can easily
be used to smoothly produce additional inhibitors. Work is currently
underway within our laboratory utilizing these structures to expand
the SAR developed herein.
Unfortunately, the compounds in this series (3n–s) failed to
show any significant MtGS inhibitory activity, highlighting a lack
of tolerance towards the introduction of large aryl substituents in
the 6-position of the 3-amino-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines.
Finally, utilizing compound 3f as the lead structure, we decided
to investigate the effect of altering the C-2 aryl substituent (R) on
MtGS inhibition. Thus, a series of compounds were synthesized
from cyclopentylisonitrile, 5-bromo-2-aminopyridine and an
appropriately substituted aldehyde as per Table 1. Compounds
4a–n were evaluated for their MtGS inhibitory activity and the re-
sults are presented in Table 3.
Table 3 shows that a C-2 phenyl ring with a hydrogen bond do-
nor in the 30-position (i.e., 4e, OH or 4l, NH2) is a clear requisite for
enzyme inhibition. Placement of the –OH in the 20- or 40-positions
(4f and 4b, respectively) results in complete loss in activity. Re-
moval of the hydrogen bond donor capacity through the introduc-
tion of a methoxy group rendered the inactive compound 4g.
Interestingly, 4e displays a twofold increase in activity compared
to 3f suggesting that the 40-methoxy group is not required for inhi-
bition. The introduction of electron withdrawing substituents (4i
and 4j) was also detrimental to activity. However, these substitu-
ents may also disrupt the orientation of the phenyl ring (4i) or
intramolecularly bind the 30-OH (4j) giving rise to the loss in po-
tency. The corresponding 30-aniline (4l) and 3-methylalcohol
Acknowledgments
Our tuberculosis-related work is supported by funding from the
Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF), the Swedish Research
Council (VR), the EU Sixth Framework Program NM4TB
CT:018923, Knut and Alice Wallenberg’s Foundation and Uppsala
University. We also thank Professor Sherry L. Mowbray, Dr. Wojci-
ech W. Krajewski and Dr. Francesco Russo for useful discussions
regarding this Letter.
References and notes
1. Harth, G.; Horwitz, M. A. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 456.
2. Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance, Planning, Financing. WHO Report
2009. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/HTM/TB/2009.411).
3. Janin, Y. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 2479.
4. Duncan, K. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004, 10, 3185.
5. Berlicki, L.; Obojska, A.; Forlani, G.; Kafarski, P. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6340.
6. Harth, G.; Horwitz, M. A. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 1425.
7. Berlicki, L.; Kafarski, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4578.
8. Logusch, E. W.; Walker, D. M.; McDonald, J. F.; Franz, J. E. Biochemistry 1989, 28,
3043.
9. Forlani, G.; Obojska, A.; Berlicki, L.; Kafarski, P. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54,
796.
10. Nordqvist, A.; Nilsson, M. T.; Röttger, S.; Odell, L. R.; Krajewski, W. W.;
Andersson, E.-L.; Larhed, M.; Mowbray, S. L.; Karlén, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008,
16, 5501.
Table 3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-amino-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines (4a–n)
11. Lagerlund, O.; Odell, L. R.; Mowbray, S. L.; Nilsson, M. T.; Krajewski, W. W.;
Nordqvist, A.; Karlén, A.; Larhed, M. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening
2007, 10, 783.
12. Selvam, C.; Goudet, C.; Oueslati, N.; Pin, J. P.; Acher, F. C. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50,
4656.
13. Griffith, O. W.; Horwitz, M.; Harth, G. WO045539, 2004.
14. DiMauro, E. F.; Kennedy, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1013.
15. Blackburn, C.; Guan, B.; Fleming, P.; Shiosaki, K.; Tsai, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 3635.
NH
Br
Br
MgCl2
O
N
N
R
N
C
EtOH, 160 °C
MW, 20 or 30 min
R
H
N
NH2
4a-n
Entry
Producta
R
IC50
(lM)
b
16. Blackburn, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5469.
17. Groebke, K.; Weber, L.; Mehlin, F. Synlett 1998, 661.
18. Blackburn, C.; Guan, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1495.
19. Yimin Lu, W. Z. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2004, 23, 827.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
4m
4n
H
>50
>50
>50
ndc
3.3 0.6
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
30-OMe,40-OHC6H3
C6H5
20. Wolter, M.; Nordmann, G.; Job, G. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 973.
21. Example synthesis: Compound 3f. To a microwave transparent vial (2–5 mL)
with a teflon coated stirring bar was added cyclopentylisonitrile (0.192 g,
2 mmol), 3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (0.304 g, 2 mmol), 2-amino-5-
bromopyridine (0.346 g, 2 mmol), MgCl2 (0.019 g, 0.1 mmol) and EtOH (2 mL).
The vial was then sealed under air and heated at 160 °C by microwave
irradiation for 20 min using a fixed hold time. After cooling, the mixture was
diluted with ethyl acetate and brine (20 mL each) and the two layers separated.
The aqueous layer was washed twice with ethyl acetate (20 mL) and the
combined organic phases were concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was
thereafter purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate. Yield: 0.530 g, 66%;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.39–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.67–1.77
(m, 4H), 3.05 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.66 (m, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 6.02 (br s, 1H),
6.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (dd, J = 2.0, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50
(dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d 23.8, 33.7, 56.2, 59.3, 106.6, 111.0, 113.8, 118.2, 119.6,
40-OHC6H4
30-OHC6H4
20-OHC6H4
30-OMeC6H4
20,30-DiOMeC6H3
20-Cl,30-OHC6H3
30-OH,40-NO2C6H3
30-NO2C6H4
>50
30-NH2C6H4
30-(CH2OH)C6H4
30-(COOH)C6H4
10.1 1.1
13.2 1.5
0.38 0.02
a
Purity >95% by HPLC or 1H NMR.
Values are means of three experiments standard error.
IC50 could not be determined due to poor solubility.
b
c