ties have been reported. Our group5 and Jørgensen and co-
workers6 independently developed diarylprolinol silyl ether
as an effective organocatalyst that has subsequently been
widely used by many research groups.7 Just recently, we5e
and Jørgensen’s group6c reported the asymmetric Michael
reaction of 4-substituted-2-oxazolinone and R,ꢀ-unsaturated
aldehydes catalyzed by diphenylprolinol silyl ether, which
affords R,R-disubstituted R-amino acid equivalents with
excellent enantioselectivity. As we previously reported, the
asymmetric Michael reaction of nitroalkane and R,ꢀ-unsatur-
ated aldehydes catalyzed by diphenylprolinol silyl ether5d,8
and nitroethanol was expected to react with R,ꢀ-unsaturated
aldehydes, generating R-monosubstituted R-amino acid equiva-
lents, the successful realization of which will be described
in this communication.
and cis-3a isomers were partially separated by column
chromatography and the enantiomeric excess of 2ar and 2aꢀ,
and those of 3ar and 3aꢀ were found to be the same and
excellent values (eq 2, Scheme 2). By the use of the partially
Scheme 2
Our scenario is as follows: nitroethanol should react with
R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehyde to generate the Michael adduct,
γ-nitroaldehyde, which would cyclize to afford substituted
tetrahydropyrans 2 and 3. Although diastereoselectivity of
2 and 3 is expected to be low in view of the previous results
for nitroethane in which low diastereoselectivity is
obtained,5d isomerization would convert cis-isomer 3 into
the more thermodynamically stable trans-isomer 2 (eq 1,
Scheme 1). Tetrahydropyran 2 would be a useful synthetic
separated isomers 2a and 3a, the isomerization of 2a and
3a was investigated under several basic conditions. When a
mixture of 2a and 3a (2a:3a ) 22:78) was treated with
inorganic bases such as K2CO3, CaCO3, KHCO3, NaHCO3,
and Cs2CO3 in MeOH, NaHCO3 was found to be effective
in affording the mixture, in which the trans-isomer is formed
predominantly (2a:3a ) 89:11) with good conversion yield.
When pure trans-isomer 2a was treated under the same
conditions, a mixture of trans- and cis-isomers was obtained
with the same ratio (2a:3a ) 89:11, eq 3). These results
indicate that there is equilibrium between trans- and cis-
isomers and that its ratio is 89:11 in MeOH. Michael and
isomerization reacions can be performed in a single-pot
operation. That is, after the treatment of cinnamaldehyde and
nitroethanol with 1 and PhCO2H at room temperature for
20 h, addition of NaHCO3 to the reaction mixture and further
stirring for 48 h afforded tetrahydropyran derivatives 2a and
3a in good yield with high diastereoselectivity and excellent
enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 1).
Scheme 1
intermediate with several functional groups for the synthesis
of nitrogen-containing molecules.
To realize this scenario, the reaction of cinnamaldehyde
and nitroethanol was selected as a model, and the Michael
reaction was examined using diphenylprolinol trimethylsilyl
ether 1 as a catalyst in the presence of benzoic acid in
MeOH.5d
Four diastereomers of tetrahydropyran derivatives 2ar,
2aꢀ, 3ar, and 3aꢀ were obtained quantitatively. Trans-2a
After the reaction conditions were optimized, the generality
of the reaction was investigated, and the results are sum-
marized in Table 1. The reaction has broad applicability. Not
only phenyl but also the 2-naphthyl-substituted acrolein
(6) (a) Marigo, M.; Wabnitz, T. C.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 794. (b) Marigo, M.; Fielenbach, D.;
Braunton, A.; Kjasgaard, A.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 3703. (c) Cabrera, S.; Reyes, E.; Aleman, J.; Milelli, A.; Kobbelgaard,
S.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12031. For recent reports,
see: (d) Jiang, H.; Falcicchio, A.; Jensen, K. L.; Paixao, M. W.; Bertelsen,
S.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7153.
(4) For reviews on organocatalysis, see: (a) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138. (b) Asymmetric Organocatalysis;
Berkessel, A., Groger, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005. (c) Hayashi,
Y. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2005, 63, 464. (d) List, B. Chem. Commun.
2006, 819. (e) Marigo, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2001.
(f) Gaunt, M. J.; Johansson, C. C. C.; McNally, A.; Vo, N. T. Drug
DiscoVery Today 2007, 12, 8. (g) EnantioselectiVe Organocatalysis; Dalko,
P. I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2007. (h) Mukherjee, S.; Yang, J. W.;
Hoffmann, S.; List, B. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5471. (i) Dondoni, A.; Massi,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4638. (j) Melchiorre, P.; Marigo, M.;
Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6138.
(5) (a) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4212. (b) Gotoh, H.; Masui, R.; Ogino, H.; Shoji, M.;
Hayashi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6853. (c) Hayashi, Y.; Okano,
T.; Aratake, S.; Hazelard, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4922. (d)
Gotoh, H.; Ishikawa, H.; Hayashi, Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5307. (e) Hayashi,
Y.; Obi, K.; Ohta, Y.; Okamura, D.; Ishikawa, H. Chem. Asian J. 2009, 4,
246, and the references cited therein.
(7) For selected examples of other group’s application of diarylprolinol
ether, see: (a) Enders, D.; Huttl, M. R. M.; Grondal, C.; Raabe, G. Nature
2006, 441, 861. (b) Vesely, J.; Ibrahem, I.; Zhao, G.-L.; Rios, R.; Cordova,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 778. (c) Xie, H.; Zu, L.; Li, H.; Wang,
J.; Wang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10886. (d) Enders, D.; Narine,
A. A.; Benninghaus, T. R.; Raabe, G. Synlett 2007, 1667. (e) Vo, N. T.;
Pace, R. D. M.; O’Hara, F.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
404. For a review, see: (f) Palomo, C.; Mielgo, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 7876. (g) Mielgo, A.; Palomo, C. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 922.
(8) Other group’s Michael reaction, see: (a) Zu, L.; Xie, H.; Li, H.;
Wang, J.; Wang, W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2660. (b) Wang, Y.; Li,
P.; Liang, X.; Zhang, T. Y.; Ye, J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1232.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4057