obtained.8 Encouraged by our recent findings in an inverse-
electron-demand aza-Diels-Alder reaction of N-Tos-1-aza-
1,3-butadienes and R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehydes,9 we hope to
develop the first direct chemo-, regio-, and stereoselective
Michael addition of R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehydes to nitroolefins
via dienamine catalysis.
Nevertheless, the self-dimerization of R,ꢀ-unsaturated
aldehyde was preferably observed in the reaction mixture
of a linear enal and nitroolefin catalyzed by a secondary
amine,6a,c which was ascribed to iminium-dienamine co-
activation of R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehyde [Scheme 1, (a)]. We
chemoselective Michael addition of 4-methyl-2-penten-1-al
2a to ꢀ-nitrostyrene 3a could be realized by the catalysis of
R,R-diphenylprolinol O-TMS ether 110 and AcOH in toluene
at room temperature. Furthermore, an exclusive R-regiose-
lectivity was noted, and the allylic alkylated product 4a was
obtained,11 which was more easily isolated and analyzed as
the corresponding alcohol 5a. Gratifyingly, both diastereo-
and enantioselectivities were remarkable (Table 1, entry 1).
Table 1. Screening Studies of Organocatalytic Direct Michael
Addition of R,ꢀ-Unsaturated Aldehyde 2a to Nitroolefin 3aa
Scheme 1. Switching Reactivity in Different R,ꢀ-Unsaturated
Aldehyde and Nitroolefin Reaction Systems
entry
solvent
yieldb (%)
drc
eec
1
2
3
4
toluene
THF
DCM
52
<10
68
<10
<10
78
91:9
-
75:25
-
94
-
82
-
DMF
envisaged that the self-dimerization process would be
significantly prohibited if a more bulky γ,γ-disubstituted R,ꢀ-
unsaturated aldehyde was applied. As a result, the intermo-
lecular conjugate addition of an in situ formed dienamine
intermediate to electrophilic nitroolefin might be enforced
[Scheme 1, (b)]. In fact, we were pleased to find that the
5
DMSO
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
-
-
6d
7e
8f
92:8
89:11
94:6
96
95
96
41
67
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 0.4 mmol of
2a, 0.2 mmol of 3a, 0.2 mmol of 1, and AcOH in 0.5 mL of solvent, for
24 h. b Isolated yield of 5a for two steps. c By HPLC analysis. d For 12 h.
e Without AcOH. f With PhCOOH.
(4) For selected examples of Michael addition of saturated carbonyl
compounds to nitroolefins by enamine catalysis, see: (a) List, B.; Pojarliev,
P.; Martin, H. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2423. (b) Betancort, J. M.; Barbas,
C. F., III. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3737. (c) Alexakis, A.; Andrey, O. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 3611. (d) Ishii, T.; Fujioka, S.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Kotsuki, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9558. (e) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4212. (f) Mase, N.; Watanabe, K.;
Yoda, H.; Takabe, K.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 4966. (g) Palomo, C.; Vera, S.; Mielgo, A.; Go´mez-Bengoa, E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5984. (h) Luo, S.; Mi, X.; Zhang, L.;
Liu, S.; Xu, H.; Cheng, J.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3093. (i)
McCooey, S. H.; Connon, S. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 599. (j) Liu, K.; Cui,
H.-F.; Nie, J.; Dong, K.-Y.; Li, X.-J.; Ma, J.-A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 923. (k)
Zhu, S.; Yu, S.; Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 545. (l) Belot,
S.; Sulzer-Mosse´, S.; Kehrli, S.; Alexakis, A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4694.
(m) Ruiz, N.; Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L.; Uria, U.
Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 9357. (n) Tan, B.; Zeng, X.; Lu, Y.; Chua, P. J.;
Zhong, G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1927.
Subsequently, a variety of solvents were screened (entries
2-6), and higher efficacy was gained in CH3CN (entry 6).
Lower reaction rate was observed in the absence of AcOH
(entry 7). In addition, similar good results were attained when
PhCOOH was used (entry 8).
Consequently, a variety of nitroolefins were explored in
the reaction with γ,γ-disubstituted R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehydes
catalyzed by 1 and AcOH in acetonitrile. As summarized in
Table 2, for 4-methyl-2-penten-1-al 2a, excellent enantiose-
lectivities were obtained for an array of nitroolefins bearing
ꢀ-aryl groups with diverse electron-withdrawing or -donating
substitutions, while the diastereoselectivities were good to
excellent (Table 2, entries 1-7). A modest dr ratio was
obtained for a heteroaryl-substituted nitroolefin, but the ee
value was still high (entry 8). In addition, ꢀ-alkyl-substituted
nitroolefins could be successfully utilized, and the results
were also outstanding (entries 9 and 10). Moreover, a racemic
4-phenyl-2-penten-1-al 2b was synthesized and tested. To
our gratification, the complete E-configuration was observed
in the newly generated CdC bond of product 5k, and
excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities were attained
(entry 11).
(5) For a review on the Michael addition of nitroolefins, see: Berner,
O. M.; Tedeschi, L.; Enders, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1877.
(6) For limited examples on dienamine catalysis, see: (a) Ramachary,
D. B.; Ramakumar, K. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7037. (b) M. Hong,
B.-C.; Wu, M.-F.; Tseng, H.-C.; Liao, J.-H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2217. (c)
Bertelsen, S.; Marigo, M.; Brandes, S.; Dine´r, P.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12973. (d) Hong, B.-C.; Wu, M.-F.; Tseng, H.-C.;
Huang, G.-F.; Su, C.-F.; Liao, J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8459. (e) Hong,
B.-C.; Tseng, H.-C.; Chen, S.-H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2840. (f) de
Figueiredo, R. M.; Fro¨hlich, R.; Christmann, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 1450. (g) Marque´s-Lo´pez, E.; Herrera, R. P.; Marks, T.; Jacobs,
W. C.; Ko¨nning, D.; de Figueiredo, R. M.; Christmann, M. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 4116.
(7) Utsumi, N.; Zhang, H.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1878.
(8) Vesely, J.; Rios, R.; Co´rdova, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1137.
(9) Han, B.; He, Z.-Q.; Li, J.-L.; Li, R.; Jiang, K.; Liu, T.-Y.; Chen,
Y.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5474.
(11) The absolute configuration of 4a was assigned based on an X-ray
structure of the derivative 6e (see Figure 1). Thus, the origin of the
stereoselectivity in this dienamine catalysis by catalyst 1 is similar to that
observed in its enamine catalysis (see ref 3f).
(10) For reviews on R,R-diarylprolinol ethers catalysis, see: (a) Palomo,
C.; Mielgo, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7876. (b) Yu, X.; Wang,
W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2037.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009
4661