Angewandte
Chemie
carbonyl group was immediate, the migration occurred after a
variable and sometimes extreme induction period (up to 8 h)
during which the time-average H NMR signal of (TfOH)n
labeled C6. This outcome also rules out mechanism E, as a
1,3-suprafacial shift in 4b can only involve 1H. Meanwhile, the
13C-labeled C10 in 7 was partially deuterated, suggestive of
intermolecularity between 4b and 4b’ in the alkene migration
step.
1
migrated from d = (12.75 ꢁ 0.15) to (13.5 ꢁ 0.6) ppm. Upon
switching to C6D6 as the solvent, so that dimeric acid (TfOH)2
more rapidly monomerizes,[11] the kinetics of alkene migra-
tion (4!7) became more reproducible but remained sigmoi-
dal in character (Figure 2a). The analysis of the maximal rate
(d[7]/dt)max as a function of TfOH concentration indicates an
approximately first-order dependency (see filled circles in
Figure 2b).
Experiment 4 confirmed that there is intermolecular
transfer of a hydrogen atom, but not palladium, as the
coreaction of 4c (ꢂ 95% 108Pd) with 4d gave two distinct
isotope clusters [2Hꢃ3,108Pd]-7 and [2Hꢂ3]-7 upon ESI-MS
analysis. Simulation of the spectrum indicated that multiple
1H/2H transfers had occurred, for example, for [2Hn,108Pd]-7,
n = 1 (10%), n = 2 (5%), and n = 3 (2.5%). Mechanism D
would allow hydride exchange by dimerization of the Pd(H)
intermediate 9. However, for this process to facilitate multiple
transfers, generation of 9 would need to be reversible and 1H/
2H exchange would only occur at C8.
Experiment 5 confirmed 1H/2H exchange in the substrate,
but ruled out mechanism D because after 50% conversion
into 7 the remaining 4d had become partially deuterated at
C10 but had not lost any deuterium atoms at C8 or C6. The
two complexes are isobaric by ESI-MS, and key to the
analysis of 4 without interference by 7 was their difference in
reactivity towards the proton sponge (Scheme 2), thus allow-
ing the generation of triene [2Hn]-5, as a proxy for 4d, without
the generation of 8.
Experiments 1 to 5 excluded all reasonable mechanisms
for hydrogen migration which directly involved the palladium
centre in 4 or the proton from the TfOH (mechanisms A to
E).[15] In further experiments, it was found that analogues of 4
that lacked the conformationally unrestricted malonate ester
moieties did not undergo migration at C9 and C10[16] (even
Figure 2. a) Temporal evolution of 7 during isomerization of 4
(29 mm) with TfOH (1 equiv) in C6D6, see the Supporting Information
for full details. b) Relationship between maximal rate (y axis) and initial
concentration (x axis) of TfOH (filled circles) and 4 (open circles).
We considered a number of mechanisms (Scheme 3) to
explain the alkene migration at C9 and C10 (4!7), including
[4a,c,d,f]
acid-mediated[4b,12] (A) and allylic C H insertion
(D)
ꢀ
mechanisms. Other possibilities include mechanisms involv-
ing the generation of a hydride[4g,h] through b-hydride
elimination[6a]/re-addition sequences emanating from C4 (B)
or C6 (C), as well as a palladium-assisted 1,3-suprafacial shift
of a hydrogen atom (E).[13]
By using a library of 2H, 13C, and 108Pd labeled[14] forms of
4, we conducted reactions with TfOH(D) in C6D6. We
employed a combination of 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopy
(1JCD and DdCH,D) and ESI-MS to quantify and locate H-
2
populations. The key experiments are summarized in Experi-
ments (1)–(5) in Scheme 4.
Experiment 1 ruled out any direct involvement of the
acid, (e.g. A) as migration induced by TfOD resulted in no
deuterium incorporation in either 4 or 7, even when eight
equivalents of TfOD was used.
Experiment 2 ruled out mechanism B (and any involve-
2
13
=
ment of alkene C1 C2), as the reaction of 4a gave [ Hn, C1]-7
Scheme 3. Six mechanisms (A to F) for alkene migration 4!7, with the key
hydrogen-migration source and destinations indicated (as H and H), see
text for full details. Dissociative[6a] diastereofacial inversion at C1 and C2 can
occur before, during, or after alkene migration at C9 and C10. E=CO2Me.
2
without any detectable incorporation of H at C1 or C4.
Experiment 3 ruled out mechanism C, as the reaction of
2
4b/4b’ gave [2Hn,13C1]-7 in which no H was detected at 13C-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6262 –6265
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim