development of a modular protocol that would involve
tandem P-C/C-C bond formation would pave the way for
the combinatorial synthesis of diversified phosphinic scaf-
folds in a single operation (Scheme 1a). In this paper, we
Table 1. Condition Screening of Reaction between 2a and 3a
Scheme 1. (a) Tandem P-C/C-C Bond-Forming Approach. (b)
Proposed Tandem P-Michael/Ireland-Claisen Sequence
entry
silylating agent
base
4a/5aa
yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HMDS
BSA
51:49
75:25
77:23
91:9
49:51
29:71
33:67
21:79
3:97
46
>99
>99
>99b
>99
>99
>99
>99
85
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
TMSCl
Et3N
i-Pr2EtN
DABCO
DBU
DMAP
NMM
DBN
imidazole
10
0:100
>99c
a Determined by 31P NMR spectroscopy of the crude mixtures. b Yield
of isolated product 4a, 85%. c Yield of isolated product 5a, 97%.
report a novel tandem P-C/C-C bond-forming reaction
based on the sequential P-Michael addition of silyl phos-
phonites to allyl acrylates followed by Ireland-Claisen
rearrangement and the extension of this transformation to a
more convergent three-component variant.
1) was observed upon silylation with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)ac-
etamide (BSA) (Table 1, entry 2). Interestingly, when TMSCl
was used the product distribution was highly dependent on the
amine employed each time. Gratifyingly, the combination of
TMSCl and Hunig’s base led to a 4a/5a ratio of 10:1 when 7
equiv of each reagent were used (Table 1, entry 4). Furthermore,
a wide screening of other amines in lieu of Hunig’s base led to
an unexpected observation: all the amines tested (except Et3N)
switched the 4a/5a ratio in favor of the Michael adduct 5a with
imidazole suppressing completely the formation of 4a (Table
1, entry 10). This remarkable tuning effect of the amine to the
reaction outcome can offer easy access to both scaffolds 4a
and 5a by using practically the same reaction setting.
NMR monitoring of the reaction between 2a and 3a revealed
that silyl ketene acetal 6 was the true precursor of the
rearrangement (Scheme 2). We observed that at -30 °C,
phosphonite 1a (δP ) 141.3 ppm) is slowly converted to an
intermediate showing two signals at δP ) 33.9 and 34.0 ppm
which are within the typical range of chemical shifts for P(V)
phosphinic esters (see the Supporting Information). Interestingly,
when the reaction was quenched with D2O after 48 h at -30
°C, compound 5a that had undergone quantitative deuterium
incorporation was obtained. This implies that the observed
intermediate corresponds to silyl ketene acetal 6 (E and Z
At the onset of our study, prompted by the work of Inanaga
et al. on the phosphine-catalyzed [3,3] rearrangement of allyl
acrylates to R-methylene-γ,δ-unsaturated carboxylic acids,6 we
reasoned that a similar [3,3] Ireland-Claisen rearrangement
could occur upon conjugate addition of in situ generated
trivalent bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphonites (1) to an allyl acrylate.
In this case, however, a stable P-C bond might be also formed
(Scheme 1b).7 Initial experiments to test our working hypothesis
were carried out with phosphinic acid 2a and allyl acrylate (3a)
as the Michael acceptor. After extensive experimentation, it was
revealed that the reaction outcome is dramatically affected by
the choice of silylation conditions. Silylation of 2a by HMDS
and subsequent addition of 3a at 25 °C led to the moderate
conversion of 2a to a 1:1 mixture of 4a and 5a (Table 1, entry
1). A significant improvement in both yield and 4a/5a ratio (3:
(3) For selected examples, see: (a) Dive, V.; Cotton, J.; Yiotakis, A.;
Michaud, A.; Vassiliou, S.; Jirácˇek, J.; Vazeux, G.; Chauvet, M.-T.;
Cuniasse, P.; Corvol, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 4330. (b)
Georgiadis, D.; Beau, F.; Czarny, B.; Cotton, J.; Yiotakis, A.; Dive, V.
Circ. Res. 2003, 93, 148. (c) Devel, L.; Rogakos, V.; David, A.; Makaritis,
A.; Beau, F.; Cuniasse, P.; Yiotakis, A.; Dive, V. J. Biol. Chem. 2006,
281, 11152. (d) Chen, H.; Noble, F.; Coric, P.; Fournie-Zaluski, M.-C.;
Roques, B. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12028. (e) Lauer-
Fields, J.; Brew, K.; Whitehead, J. K.; Li, S.; Hammer, R. P.; Fields, G. B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10408. (f) Liu, X.; Xu, X. E.; Tian, X.; Mazur,
A.; Ebetino, F. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 646, 212.
(5) For a phosphonium zwitterion isolated during a phosphine-catalyzed
Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction, see: (a) Zhu, X.-F.; Henry, C. E.; Kwon,
O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6722. For a tandem P-C/C-C bond-
forming reaction involving phosphides, see: (b) Hayashi, M.; Matsuura,
Y.; Watanabe, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5135.
(4) For selected recent examples, see: (a) Zhu, G.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Q.;
Xiao, D.; Cao, P.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3836. (b) Wang,
L.-C.; Luis, A. L.; Agapiou, K.; Jang, H.-Y.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 2402. (c) Zhu, X.-F.; Lan, J.; Kwon, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4716. (d) Cho, C. W.; Krische, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 6689. (e) Kamijo, S.; Kanazawa, C.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 9260. (f) Wilson, J. E.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 1426. (g) Cowen, B. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 10988. (h) Fang, Y.-Q.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
5660.
(6) Hanamoto, T.; Baba, Y.; Inanaga, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 299.
(7) For Ireland-Claisen rearrangements triggered by conjugate additions,
see: (a) Aoki, Y.; Kuwajima, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7457. (b)
Yamazaki, T.; Shinohara, N.; Kitazume, T.; Sato, S. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 8140. (c) Eriksson, M.; Hjelmencrantz, A.; Nilsson, M.; Olsson, T.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 12631. (d) Takai, K.; Ueda, T.; Kaihara, H.; Sunami,
Y.; Moriwake, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8728. (e) Bausch, C. C.; Johnson,
J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1575. For a relevant reaction with
oxasilacyclopentenes, see: (f) Calad, S. A.; Woeprel, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 2046.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009
4697