6882 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 14, 2009
Stefanelli et al.
(d, 1J = 4.2 Hz, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 9.00 (d, 1J = 4.2 Hz, 2H,
being H2SO4, halogenated acids, or organic acids like TFA,
the exact choice depending upon the stability by the complex.
However, the exploitation of such harsh acid protocols to
metallocorroles has been problematic because of the in-
creased reactivity of the corrole macrocycle in acid media,
which can easily lead to peripheral substitution and/or
decomposition products.14
β-pyrrolic), 8.82 (d, 1J=4.0 Hz, 4H, β-pyrrolic)
Spectroscopic Characterization of Compounds. [(3-NO2)-
(5-OH)tBuTPisoCor]H2. Anal. found for C49H49N5O3: C,
77.8: H, 6.6; N, 9.4. Calcd: C, 77.9; H, 6.7; N, 9.3%. UV-
vis: λmax (CH2Cl2, log ε)=398 (4.79), 622 (4.09), 674 (4.08) nm.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=16.37 (s, 1H, NH), 14.97 (s,
1H, NH), 7.53 (s, br, 5H, phenyl), 7.50 (s, br, 1H, phenyl), 7.40
(m, 5H, phenyl þ β-pyrrolic), 7.15 (d, 1J=3.63 Hz, 2H, phenyl),
6.92 (m, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 6.73 (d, 1J=4.71 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic),
6.55 (m, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.36 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.30 (m, 1H,
β-pyrrolic), 1.42 (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3), 1.39 (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3), 1.27
ppm (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3). LRMS (FAB): m/z 755 (Mþ).
Considering this crucial aspect, we initially used the bi-
::
phasic method reported by Bruckner et al.,9b to determine the
most accurate experimental protocol. For this purpose, we
prepared a solution of (TtBuPCor)Ag in chloroform and
added the same volume of 1 M HCl. The progress of the
reaction was monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy after acid
addition and no changes in the spectral features were ob-
served under these conditions. Increasing the acid concen-
tration to 4 M led to formation of the corrole cation in 1 h,
but the reaction workup afforded almost quantitatively
the starting complex together with traces of an isocorrole
species,7,15 as recently reported in the case of copper corrole
demetalation using different acidic mixtures.9b Similar results
were obtained after adding a few drops of concentrated HCl
to a chloroform mixture containing (TtBuPCor)Ag.
Whenthesameprocedurewasappliedto(NO2TtBuPCor)Ag,
the UV-vis spectrum revealed a complete transforma-
tion of the starting complex into a different compound in
about 12 h. TLC analysis showed the almost quantitative
formation of a green band having a lower Rf value than the
starting macrocycle. Subsequent purification of the crude
mixture afforded an analytically pure compound that was
spectroscopically characterized as an isocorrole. The pre-
sence of a blue-shifted Soret band below 400 nm and two
bands above 600 nm in the visible spectrum combined with
NMR data which showed resonances at about 15 ppm for the
inner NH and the β-pyrrolic resonances shifted below 7 ppm,
supported formation of [(3-NO2)(5-OH)tBuTPisoCor]H2.
This is analogous to results from our previous experiments
on the demetalation of Cu(III) corrolates.9b Attempts to
obtain crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were unsuccessful,
but the same demetalation protocol carried out on (NO2TT-
Cor)Ag afforded a single compound with similar spectro-
scopic features, for which single crystals were obtained by
slow diffusion of methanol into a diluted dichloromethane
solution. An X-ray crystal structure determination of this
compound unambiguously confirmed it to be [(3-NO2)-
(5-OH)TTisoCor]H2 (Figure 1). Although the oxidative for-
mation of isocorroles generally gives a statistical mixture of
5- and 10-substituted compounds,15 the demetalation of
3-NO2-triarylcorroles affords exclusively the 5-hydroxy sub-
stituted isocorrole, whose formation is clearly favored by the
intramolecular hydrogen bond established between the
hydroxyl and nitro groups on the compound (as evidenced
in Figure 1).
[(3-NO2)(5-OH)TTisoCor]H2. Anal. found for C40H31N5O3:
C, 76.4: H, 4.9; N, 11.2. Calcd: C, 76.3; H, 5.0; N, 11.1%. UV-
vis: λmax (CH2Cl2, log ε)=397 (4.75), 616 (4.06), 672 (4.01) nm.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=16.35 (s, 1H, NH), 14.95 (s,
1H, NH), 7.53 (s, br, 4H, phenyl), 7.50 (s, br, 1H, phenyl), 7.40
(m, 5H, phenyl þ β-pyrrolic), 7.15 (d, 1J=3.63 Hz, 2H, phenyl),
6.92 (m, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 6.73 (d, 1J=4.71 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic),
6.55 (m, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.36 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.30 (m, 1H,
β-pyrrolic), 1.42 (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3), 1.39 (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3), 1.27
ppm (s, 9H, -C(CH3)3). LRMS (FAB): m/z 628 (Mþ).
[(10-OH)tBuTPisoCor]H2. Anal. found for C49H50N4O: C,
82.9: H, 6.9; N, 7.7. Calcd: C, 82.8; H, 7.1; N, 7.8%. UV-vis:
λmax (CH2Cl2, log ε) = 360 (4.47), 433 (4.68), 670 (3.83), 725
(3.86) nm. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=15.62 (s, 2H, NH),
1
7.59 (d, 1J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.48 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H,
phenyl), 7.26 (d, 1J=8.1 Hz, 4H, phenyl), 7.06 (d, 1J=7.8 Hz,
2H, phenyl), 6.69 (m, 4H, β-pyrrolic), 6.64 (d, 1J=4.5 Hz, 2H,
β-pyrrolic), 6.40 (d, 1J = 4.2 Hz, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 1.61 ppm
(s, 27H, -C(CH3)3). LRMS (FAB): m/z 710 (Mþ).
[(5-OH)tBuTPisoCor]H2. Anal. found for C49H50N4O: C,
82.6: H, 7.0; N, 7.8. Calcd: C, 82.4; H, 7.1; N, 7.7%. UV-vis:
λ
max (CH2Cl2, log ε)=407 (4.69), 680 (3.86), 738 (3.83) nm. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=16.21 (s, 1H, NH), 15.84 (s, 1H,
NH), 7.59 (d, 1J=8.1 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.42 (d, 1J=7.8 Hz, 2H,
phenyl), 7.27 (m, 6H, phenyl), 7.07 (d, 1J=8.1 Hz, 2H, phenyl),
1
1
6.95 (d, J=4.5 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.84 (d, J=4.5 Hz, 1H,
1
β-pyrrolic), 6.56 (m, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 6.51 (d, J=4.5 Hz, 1H,
β-pyrrolic), 6.30 (m, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 6.14 (m, 1H, β-pyrrolic),
6.02 (m, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 1.61 (s, 18H, -C(CH3)3), 1.59 (s, 9H, -C
(CH3)3). LRMS (FAB): m/z 710 (Mþ).
(NO2TtBuPCor)H3. Anal. found for C49H49N5O2: C, 79.3:
H, 6.9; N, 9.4. Calcd: C, 79.5; H, 6.7; N, 9.5%. UV-vis: λmax
(CH2Cl2, log ε)=397 (4.64), 438 (4.68), 465 (4.69), 664 (4.29) nm.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=9.07 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.66 (s,
br, 3H, phenyl), 8.52 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.37 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic),
8.28 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.20 (s, br, 2H, phenyl), 8.04 (m, 4H,
phenyl), 7.80 (m, 6H, phenyl), 1.60 ppm (s, 27H, -C(CH3)3).
LRMS (FAB): m/z 740 (Mþ) .
(NH2TTCor)H3. Anal. found for C40H33N5: C, 85.0: H, 4.8;
N, 10.2. Calcd: C, 85.1; H, 4.8; N, 10.1%. UV-vis: λmax
(CH2Cl2, log ε) = 418 (4.71), 578 (4.06), 635 (3.88) nm. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.86 (d, 1J = 4.7 Hz, 1H,
1
1
β-pyrrolic), 8.81 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.55 (d, J=
4.7 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.51 (d, 1J=4.3 Hz, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 8.45
1
(m, 2H, β-pyrrolic), 8.29 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 8.06 (d,
The intramolecular OH O hydrogen bond to the nitro
3 3 3
1J=7.4 Hz, 4H, phenyl), 7.98 (s, 1H, β-pyrrolic), 7.63 (m, 4H,
phenyl), 7.55 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 2.69 ppm (s, 9H,
group is normal and approximately linear, having O
O
3 3 3
1
˚
distance 2.714(2) A and a 163(2)° angle about H. The four
corrole N atoms are essentially coplanar, exhibiting a mean
deviation of 0.010(1) A. NH hydrogen atoms appear ordered
-CH3). LRMS (FAB): m/z 691 (Mþ).
˚
Results and Discussion
and have a direction preference toward one adjacent N atom
Studies of demetalation were carried out with (TtBuPCor)
Ag and the corresponding 3-(NO2) derivative. We started
with the most general routes previously used in the case of
porphyrins. These involve the removal of the central metal
ion in aqueous solutions containing different acids, examples
(14) Ou, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhu, W.; Da, Z.; Kadish, K. M. J. Porphyrins
Phthalocyanines 2008, 12, 1.
(15) Nardis, S.; Pomarico, G.; Fronczek, F. R.; Vicente, M. G. H.;
Paolesse, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8643.