Quantitation of HQ Protein Adducts
Chem. Res. Toxicol., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2000 855
(25%), 168 (13%).
was added dropwise to the BQ solution. A thick precipitate
formed which required the addition of 30 mL of nitrogen-purged
distilled, deionized water to dissolve. Following a brief (<15 min)
additional period, the stirred reaction solution was poured into
a separatory funnel and washed four times with 50 mL portions
of ether. The resulting aqueous phase was then transferred to
a 250 mL round-bottomed flask and the majority of methanol
removed by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure. The addi-
tion of acetone (equal volume) produced a voluminous precipitate
from which the supernatant was discarded. The resulting solid
product was dried first with a gentle stream of nitrogen followed
by drying under reduced pressure (<0.01 Torr). This procedure
yielded a mixture of the crude conjugates (0.9428 g) which were
dissolved in degassed, distilled water (300 mg/mL) and purified
by preparative HPLC by repeatedly injecting 200 µL aliquots
onto a 10 mm × 50 cm Whatman Partisil M20 10/25 ODS-3
preparative column (Clifton, NJ ). The column was eluted with
a mobile phase consisting of methanol, water, and acetic acid
(9:90:1, v:v:v) at a flow rate of 3 mL/min. The column effluent
was monitored by UV detection at 280 nm, and fractions of the
column effluent were collected. The individual conjugates were
found to elute from the preparative column in the order reported
by Lau et al. (2). Fractions corresponding to individual compo-
nents were combined and excess methanol removed by brief
rotary evaporation. The remaining solutions were then frozen
in dry ice and acetone and lyophilized to produce off-white solids.
The various glutathione conjugates were identified by order of
elution from the chromatographic column and by comparison
with published UV spectrophotometric and NMR spectrometric
data as well as by conversion to the permethylated derivatives
(Figure 2).
(3) 2,5-(Diglu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e: UV λmax 315 nm;
1H NMR δ 2.02 (acetate impurity), 2.08 (dd, 4H, Glu-â), 2.42 (t,
4H, Glu-γ), 3.18 and 3.36 (ddd, 4H, Cys-â), 3.73 (m, 2H, Glu-R),
3.78 (s, 4H, Gly-R), 4.43 (dd, 2H, Cys-R), 6.96 (s, 2H, aromatic);
GC/MS (of the permethylated derivative) EI (relative intensity)
m/z 232 [11%, (M + 2)+], 230 (100%, M+), 215 (95%), 200 (26%),
181 (43%).
(4) 2,6-(Diglu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e: UV λmax 266,
1
318 nm; H NMR δ 2.05 (acetate impurity), 2.08 (dd, 4H, Glu-
â), 2.42 (t, 4H, Glu-γ), 3.18 and 3.36 (ddd, 4H, Cys-â), 3.73 (m,
2H, Glu-R), 3.76 (s, 4H, Gly-R), 4.43 (dd, 2H, Cys-R), 6.96 (s,
2H, aromatic); GC/MS (of the permethylated derivative) EI
(relative intensity) m/z 232 [11%, (M + 2)+], 230 (100%, M+),
215 (42%).
(5) 2,3,5-(Tr iglu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e: UV λmax 337
nm; 1H NMR δ 2.02 (acetate impurity), 2.06 (m, 6H, Glu-â), 2.42
(m, 6H, Glu-γ), 3.18 and 3.38 (m, 6H, Cys-â), 3.7-3.8 (m, 9H,
Glu-R and Gly-R), 4.26-4.45 (m, 3H, Cys-R), 7.04 (s, 1H,
aromatic); GC/MS (of the permethylated derivative) EI (relative
intensity) m/z 278 [14%, (M + 2)+], 276 (100%, M+), 261 (34%),
246 (62%).
(6) 2,3,5,6-(Tetr a glu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e: UV λmax
1
356 nm; H NMR δ 2.05 (acetate impurity), 2.12 (dd, 8H, Glu-
â), 2.51 (m, 8H, Glu-γ), 3.19 and 3.42 (ddd, 8H, Cys-â), 3.72-
3.86 (m, 12H, Glu-R and Gly-R), 4.28 (dd, 4H, Cys-R); GC/MS
(of the permethylated derivative) EI (relative intensity) m/z 324
[20%, (M + 2)+], 322 (100%, M+), 307 (8%), 292 (13%), 279 (27%),
264 (24%).
Tissu e Collection . At the termination of each study, rats
were anesthetized (CO2) and exsanguinated via the inferior vena
cava. Blood was collected in tubes containing EDTA. The livers,
kidneys, and spleens were removed and placed immediately into
plastic bags or glass bottles stored over ice. Tissue samples
which were not further processed on the day of collection were
stored frozen at -70 °C until they were analyzed.
P u r ity An a lysis of Glu ta th ion e Con ju ga tes. The pre-
paratively purified glutathione conjugates of HQ were analyzed
for purity by HPLC using a Hewlett-Packard 1090 HPLC system
equipped with a 4.6 mm × 25 cm Zorbax ODS reversed-phase
analytical column (Dupont Instruments, Wilmington, DE).
Samples were dissolved in degassed, distilled water (1-3 mg/
mL) and 20 µL aliquots analyzed immediately. The column was
eluted with 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 3.9) containing
1% (by volume) acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Detection was carried out with a diode array (Hewlett-Packard),
allowing the collection of full UV spectra. The purities of all
glutathione conjugates were determined to be >95% by analyti-
cal HPLC.
P r ep a r a tion of P r otein Sa m p les. Dissected livers, kidneys,
and spleens were washed in phosphate-buffered saline [0.1 M
potassium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, and 1.12% KCl (pH 7.4)],
blotted dry, weighed, and homogenized using approximately 5
mL of the same buffer per gram of tissue. Equal volumes of 40%
TCA were added to the resulting suspensions to precipitate
proteins. Protein precipitates were collected by centrifugation
and were washed sequentially with acetone (two times), 80%
methanol/H2O (four times), acetone (two times), and ethyl ether
(two times). The resulting protein samples were then dried by
either brief rotary evaporation or application of a gentle nitrogen
stream followed by application of high vacuum (>24 h) to
produce free-flowing, off-white solids. Samples of whole blood
were treated with equal volumes of 40% TCA, and the protein
precipitates washed sequentially with acetone (six times), 80%
methanol/H2O (four times), acetone (four times), and ethyl ether
(four times). Solid blood protein samples were dried initially
with a gentle stream of nitrogen followed by application of high
vacuum (>24 h) to produce free-flowing solids.
Alk a lin e P er m eth yla tion . Methylthio-substituted deriva-
tives of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene, resulting from the alkaline
permethylation of tissue, urine, or blood protein, were obtained
using a modification of a published procedure (7, 10). In the case
of tissue proteins, approximately 125 mg samples were placed
into PTFE-lined, screw-capped culture tubes (16 mm × 100 mm)
followed by 1.0 mL of methyl iodide. Resorcinol as an internal
standard was added at this point (50 µL of a 0.1 mg/g of solution
in distilled water containing 0.5 mg/g of ascorbic acid). Dry
nitrogen was gently bubbled through the mixture, and 1.0 mL
of nitrogen-purged, 4 N NaOH (purged a minimum of 10 min
with nitrogen immediately prior to use) was then added. Tubes
were flushed for an additional 30 s with nitrogen, capped tightly,
and heated in thermostatically controlled heated blocks at 80
°C for 4 h. Following this, the tubes were cooled in ice and
opened. A 0.75 mL aliquot of 14 N NaOH was cautiously added
to each tube followed by 4 mL of methanol and acetone (1:1,
Str u ctu r a l Ch a r a cter iza tion of th e Glu ta th ion e Con -
ju ga tes. The 1H NMR spectra of the purified glutathione
conjugates of HQ (dissolved in degassed D2O) were recorded on
a 300 MHz Varian model VXR300S spectrometer. Structures
were confirmed by comparison with published spectra (2). In
this report, assignment of these isomers is based on the
similarity of spectral parameters to those published by Lau et
al. (2). It should be noted that Eckert et al. (12) reverse the
assignment of the 2,5- and 2,6-bis-glutathione-substituted
conjugates. In this regard, the nomenclature used in the present
report for these gluathione conjugates is also that used by Lau
et al. (2). The permethylated derivatives correspond to the
structures shown in Figure 2.
(1) 2-(Glu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e: UV λmax 303 nm; 1H
NMR δ 2.05 (acetate impurity), 2.07 (dd, 2H, Glu-â), 2.41 (t,
2H, Glu-γ), 3.19 and 3.33 (ddd, 2H, Cys-â), 3.72 (m, 1H, Glu-R),
3.80 (s, 2H, Gly-R), 4.43 (dd, 1H, Cys-R), 6.72-6.96 (m, 3H,
aromatic); GC/MS (of the permethylated derivative) EI (relative
intensity) m/z 186 [5%, (M + 2)+], 184 (100%, M+), 169 (64%),
154 (32%), 137 (14%), 123 (42%).
(2) 2,3-(Diglu ta th ion -S-yl)h yd r oqu in on e. Impure material
was obtained following semipreparative HPLC, indicating con-
tamination primarily with the tetraglutathionyl-substituted
material: UV λmax 322 nm; 1H NMR δ 2.12 (m, 4.6H, Glu-â),
2.50 (m, 4.5H, Glu-γ), 3.2-3.6 (m, 4.52H, Cys-â), 3.75 (m, 6.7H,
Gly-R), 4.32 (m, 2H, Cys-R), 6.97 (s, 1.8H, aromatic); GC/MS (of
the permethylated derivative) EI (relative intensity) m/z 232
[11%, (M + 2)+], 230 (100%, M+), 215 (23%), 200 (88%), 185