Article
Crystal Growth & Design, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2010 245
Figure 1. Schematic structural comparison of Boc-L-Phe-D-Oxd-OBn and Boc-L-Phe-D-Imz-OBn (red and blue arrows show the hydrogen
bond directions).
acetate 1:1 as eluant) and 1 was obtained pure in 65% yield. Mp=
68 ꢀC; [R]D þ0.081 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2); IR (CH2Cl2, 10 mM): ν=3444,
1759, 1716, 1689 cm-1; IR (1% in dry KBr): ν = 3391, 1761, 1687
cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 1.42 (s, 9H, t-Bu), 2.95 (dd,
1H, J=7.5, 13.8 Hz, CHN-CHH-Ph), 3.2 (dd, 1H, J=4.8, 13.5 Hz,
CHN-CHH-Ph), 3.4 (dd, 1H, J = 3.0, 9.3 Hz, NCHH), 3.7 (t, 1H,
J=9.9 Hz, NCH), 4.8 (m, 1H, NCHH), 5.2-5.4 (m, 3H, OCH2Ph þ
Boc-NH), 5.85 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.95 (m, 1H, CHN-CHH-Ph), 7.2-7.4
(m, 10H, 2 ꢀ Ph); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 28.5, 39.9, 40.6,
54.1, 55.4, 68.0, 127.0, 128.6, 129.0, 129.9, 135.2, 136.6, 154.7, 155.0,
169.1, 172.7.
Plate-Like Crystal Precipitation. The purified compound was
Figure 2. Suggested mechanism of the modified Hofmann rearran-
gement for the synthesis of 4-substituted imidazolidin-2-one.
crystallized by slow evaporation of a solution of 1 (35 mg) in metha-
nol, ethanol, or isopropanol (1 mL in each case). Crystals called 1a
(crystallized from methanol), 1b (crystallized from ethanol), and 1c
(crystallized from isopropanol) were prepared.
were performed by using high purity standards (n-decane, benzene,
and indium). The material (about 1.5 mg of sample) was sealed in
aluminum pans. Heating was carried out at 3 ꢀC min-1 in the
temperature range 20-200 ꢀC. Transition, denaturation, or deso-
lvation temperatures (TD) were determined as the maximum peak
value of the corresponding endothermic phenomena. Weight loss
during heating was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
using a calorimeter DSC-Q100 from TA Instruments Waters
(USA). The temperature range was from 23 to 350 ꢀC at a heating
rate of 5 ꢀC/min under dry nitrogen atmosphere.
Calculations. A detailed conformational analysis of Boc-L-Phe-D-
Imz-OBn and calculations on the various crystal packages were
performed at the HF/6-31G* level of ab initio MO theory. The
Gaussian03 software package was employed in all cases.13 The
details are given in the Supporting Information.
Imaging. The solid material was observed by optical microscopy
(OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The OM images
were collected using a Leica optical microscope equipped with a
CCD camera. Samples SEM images were collected on glass cover-
slip after coating with gold and observed using Philips 515 SEM.
The images were recorded using a CCD digital camera.
Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction for 1a, 1b, and 1c. The X-ray
intensity data for 1a, 1b, and 1c were measured on a Bruker SMART
Apex II CCD area detector diffractometer. Cell dimensions and the
orientation matrix were initially determined from a least-squares
refinement on reflections measured in three sets of 20 exposures,
collected in three different ω regions, and eventually refined against
all data. A full sphere of reciprocal space was scanned by 0.3ꢀ ω steps.
The software SMART9 was used for collecting frames of data, index-
ing reflections, and determination of lattice parameters. The collected
frames were then processed for integration by the SAINT program,10
and an empirical absorption correction was applied using SADABS.11
The structures were solved by direct methods (SIR 97)11 and subse-
quent Fourier analysis and refined by full-matrix least-squares on
F2 (SHELXTL),12 using anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-
hydrogen atoms. All hydrogen atoms, except the N-H protons and
methine hydrogens, were added in calculated positions, included in the
final stage of refinement with isotropic thermal parameters, U(H) =
1.2Ueq(C)[U(H)=1.5Ueq(C-Me)], and allowed to ride on their carrier
atoms. The absolute structure configuration was not determined from
X-ray data but was known from the synthetic route. Crystal data and
experimental details for 1a, 1b, and 1c are reported in Table S1,
Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
The dipeptide Boc-L-Phe-D-Imz-OBn 1 was prepared in a
single step starting from the readily available Boc-L-Phe-D-
Asn-OBn (Asn=asparagine) utilizing a modified methodol-
ogy for the Hofmann rearrangement that we have recently
described.14 This method was necessary because the prepara-
tion of an imidazolidin-2-one-4-carboxylate could not be
performed by reaction of 1,2-diaminopropanoic acid (DAP)
with triphosgene, due to the low availability of DAP and the
poor reaction yield.
The rearrangement is a very general reaction and can be
applied both to protected asparagine and to asparagine-
containing protected polypeptides. It is promoted by the
readily available PhI(OAc)2 in the presence of DBU (DBU =
1,8-diazabicyclo[5,4,0]undec-7-ene) and provides the desired
heterocycle in high yield (Figure 2).
After preparation and purification with conventional meth-
ods, Boc-L-Phe-D-Asn-OBn was treated with PhI(OAc)2 and
DBU in tetrahydrofuran for 1 h to furnish the desired com-
pound 1 in 65% yield after flash chromatography (Scheme 1).
X-ray Powder Diffraction Analysis. Powder X-ray diffraction
patterns were collected using a PanAnalytical X’Pert Pro equipped
with X’Celerator detector powder diffractometer using Cu KR
radiation generated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The instrument was
configured with a 1/32ꢀ divergence and 1/32ꢀ antiscattering slits.
A standard quartz sample holder 1 mm deep, 20 mm high, and
15 mm wide was used. The diffraction patterns were collected within
the 2θ range from 3ꢀ to 40ꢀ with a step size (Δ 2θ) of 0.02ꢀ and a
counting time of 300 s.
Thermal Analysis. Calorimetric measurements were performed
using a Perkin-Elmer DSC-7. Temperature and enthalphy calibrations